Friday, March 06, 2015

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU-JEWS CAN DEFEND THEMSELVES.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

ENVIROMENT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCQ7-QrDfSY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=759IDu7nmSE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhWXpph36nM
WASTED MONEY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NkRlrAFxrc
LEVINS SEX INVOLVMENT-sex ed program
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9OIy5VX4rw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0VerG3irIA
RADICAL ISLAM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74U1ctnlQo0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgG0cq_JdgI

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.
12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE

10 MOMENTS FROM NETANYAHUS SPEECH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-yjl52y_7g

Netanyahu: Unlike Megillah Days, Jews Can Defend Themselves Now-Prime Minister, at megillah reading, said he was thankful to Israelis and world Jewry 'for their support of my speeches in Washington.'By Yaakov Levi-First Publish: 3/5/2015, 9:03 PM-ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS

Speaking after the reading of Megillat Esther (the Scroll of Esther) in honor of Purim Thursday night, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said that he was thankful to Israelis and world Jewry “for their support of my speeches in Washington. The days that Jews were unable to defend themselves against threats and they remained silent as their enemies attempted to destroy them are over and will not return. The State of Israel will do everything necessary to defend Jews,” Netanyahu said.Netanyahu attended the megillah reading in the Great Synagogue of Jerusalem, along with Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat and hundreds of congregants.“In my speech to Congress, I mentioned the story of Esther,” Netanyahu said after the reading. “Esther unveiled the evil plot of Haman, to destroy the Jews. She persuaded the Kind of Persia to allow the Jews to defend themselves, and thus saved them. In the reading of the megillah, we express our determination to overcome the enemies that arise against us in every generation.”If the Jews survived his regime, Hitler is said to have quipped, “they will celebrate a second Purim,” Netanyahu said. “The Nazis were beaten but the Jews did not celebrate, because they managed to destroy a third of our people. There was no king to give us license to defend ourselves, and even if there had been we would not have had the resources to do so.“Now, with the new threats against us today, we have two lessons to learn from Purim,” Netanyahu said. “We must speak up and scream out against all the dangers facing us before it is too late. That is what I did in Washington. I called on the US and its allies not to sign on the bad deal that is developing with Iran that will be a danger to Israel, the region, and the whole world.“In addition, another lesson is that we need to be ready to defend ourselves by ourselves,” Netanyahu added. “Unlike during the days of Esther and Mordechai, we are not separated and dispersed among the nations. We have our own state, our own army. We do not need to ask others to defend us. Today, G-d willing, Israel has the right and the ability to defend itself.”

Galon: I'd Make a Great Education Minister-Meretz chairwoman tells voters she thinks she would be a good choice to serve as Education Minister in the next government.By Reut Hadar-First Publish: 3/6/2015, 2:45 AM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS

Meretz chairwoman MK Zehava Galon on Thursday declared that she believes she would be a good choice to serve as Education Minister in the next government.Galon, who was responding to online questions submitted by users of the Haaretz newspaper’s website, also said that, as part of a future peace agreement with the Palestinian Authority, Israel would have to evict some communities in Judea and Samaria but would also have to take the so-called “settlement blocs” into consideration."Ilan Gilon could be an amazing Welfare Minister and I can be a great Education Minister and also a good Interior Minister,” she said, when asked what ministerial portfolio she would request if she ends up joining a government headed by Yitzhak Herzog.Galon rejected the argument that her party is "Tel Aviv centric" and elitist. "It’s time to eradicate this image which may have characterized Meretz in the past, but is no longer true. I do not think this is a valid question. Maybe we should be asked if we are Petah Tikva centered. We have two candidates from there in the top ten spots on our list, Michal Rozin and myself," she said.Addressing the peace negotiations with the PA, Galon said that a political settlement based on the pre-1967 borders should be promoted."Land swaps, division of sovereignty in Jerusalem and the evacuation of settlements. However, the reality that was created on the ground would require taking the settlement blocs into consideration, agreeing on swaps and removing 100,000 settlers from their homes under an evacuation-compensation agreement,” she said.As of last week Meretz, an extreme leftist party which has for years advocated for the concept of a two-state solution, was losing strength in pre-election polls.A poll released last Friday gave Meretz only four seats, falling even past the fledgling Yachad-Ha'am Itanu party.

PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they (MUSLIMS) have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)
6 The tabernacles of Edom,(JORDAN) and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, PALESTINIANS,JORDAN) and the Hagarenes;(EGYPT)
7 Gebal,(HEZZBALLOH,LEBANON) and Ammon,(JORDAN) and Amalek;(SYRIA,ARABS,SINAI) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)

Iranian Official: Netanyahu is Like a Wanton Woman-Iran's Parliament Speaker attacks Netanyahu's speech for hypocrisy, claims Israel has assassinated dozens and wants to take over region.By Dalit Halevy-First Publish: 3/5/2015, 8:54 AM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS

Ali Larijani, the speaker of the Iranian Shura Council or parliament, has accused Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu of lying in his recent address to the United States Congress in Washington DC.
According to Larijani, Netanyahu intends to take over the Middle East - a "fact" he conveniently left out of the address.As to Iran, it is not striving to become an empire, Larijani claimed, noting that the Islamic Revolution that came out of Tehran is opposed to such a move. This despite the comments of General Qassem Soleimani, a commander of Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards, who in February hailed Tehran's widening influence from "Bahrain to Iraq, and Syria to Yemen and North Africa."Larijani said Iran is opposed to Israel's "occupation" and that is what has caused an Islamic awakening in the region.According to the speaker, Netanyahu's speech reflects Israel's "helplessness and anxiety" in light of its weakening state over the past three decades. Israel's real concern, he argues, is Iran's power in the region.Larijani attacked the "hypocrisy" of Israel's demands to prevent Iran from further nuclear development, since he says Israel holds more than 200 atomic bombs.He added that Netanyahu's accusations that Iran supports terrorism are ridiculous, claiming that Israel has assassinated hundreds of people in recent decades including co-founder of the Islamic Jihad movement Fathi Shaqaqi, Hezbollah terrorist commander Imad Mughniyeh, Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) terror mastermind Yasser Arafat who tests showed died of natural causes, as well as Iranian nuclear scientists.In this context, Larijani argues Netanyahu is like a "wanton woman" who enters the city with a torn dress, and upon being asked why she does so, responds that there are no respectable men in the city.Even if world powers come to an agreement with Iran, Israel will be ready to attack the Islamic Republic alone, Laijani stressed, before defending Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's position that "Israel is a metastasized tumor in the region."According to Larijani, Netanyahu was hypocritical for saying Israel would attack alone if need be, while bringing panic to Congress and warning of Iran's capabilities. For its part Iran has threatened Israel with annihilation on numerous occasions.Regarding negotiations with world powers, Larijani said that there may be differences of opinion between government leaders and the negotiators about the tactics of the negotiations, but everyone is loyal to the line dictated by the leadership.

Dagan: Netanyahu and Bennett Leading to An Apartheid State-Former Mossad chief issues yet another verbal attack against the Prime Minister and his policies.By Uzi Baruch-First Publish: 3/6/2015, 3:16 AMISRAELNATIONALNEWS

Former Mossad chief Meir Dagan is once again verbally attacking Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and is also taking a jab at Jewish Home chairman Naftali Bennett.In an interview with Channel 2 News which will air in full on Friday and of which parts were published Thursday evening, Dagan argues that Netanyahu’s policies are "leading to a binational state or an apartheid state. I think it's a disaster.""For 45 years I served this country - all of them, in order to safeguard its security as a Jewish and Zionist state. I would not want this dream to disappear," he continued."The reality is that the Prime Minister and Mr. Bennett are leading towards a binational state. You're not so sure that this country will continue to exist in the future. If this direction continues - I have some very complex questions," charged Dagan.Since leaving his post as head of the Mossad, Dagan has continuously verbally attacked Netanyahu and his policies. The last such attack came in late January, after it was announced that Netanyahu had accepted an invitation to address Congress. Dagan said then that Netanyahu and Bennett "are leading us to a binational state which is a disaster and dangerous to Zionism”, adding, “The policies that they are leading are going in very problematic directions both in the field of the Palestinian problem as well as in our relations with our great friend, the United States. I admit that I am concerned.”Last year Dagan declared, contrary to Netanyahu’s statements, that Israel could survive without maintaining a presence in the Jordan Valley. Other experts have warned that Israel’s presence in the area is crucial.He later dismissed Netanyahu’s demand that the Palestinian Authority (PA) recognize Israel as a Jewish state as “nonsense”.He previously said he does not believe a nuclear Iran would be an existential threat to Israel and also said the Netanyahu government’s policies on Iran are irresponsible, publicly warning against attacking Iran.The Prime Minister’s Office responded to Dagan’s latest rant by saying, "Meir Dagan is wrong and misleading. Netanyahu is working for the security of the Israeli people from a comprehensive view of the good of the nation and the state and does not give in to international pressure. The reason is clear: any area that will be handed over to the Palestinians will be captured by radical Islam and terrorist groups supported by Iran.”“The Prime Minister's speech to Congress resonated around the world and presented the dangers to Israel and the world as a result of a bad agreement. There is no doubt that the Prime Minister challenged the powers to address these dangers,” the statement added.

ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST

1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.

ISRAELS TROUBLE

JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.

DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)

ISAIAH 41:11
11  Behold, all they that were incensed against thee (ISRAEL) shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing;(DESTROYED) and they that strive with thee shall perish.(ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED)

Russia ready to transfer Sukhoi technologies to RI: Envoy-Bagus BT Saragih, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta | World | Thu, March 05 2015, 9:38 PM

Russia reiterated its readiness on Thursday to comply with the transfer-of-technology scheme required by Indonesia should the latter opt to buy Russian-made Sukhoi Su-35 jet fighters to modernize its air force.“I talked to Indonesian Defense Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu a couple of months ago. We are fully aware of Indonesian government regulations on transfer-of-technology and industrial-offset schemes,” Russian Ambassador to Indonesia Mikhail Galuzin told journalists at his residence in South Jakarta.“We are ready and open for further discussion with our Indonesian partners on the feasibility of procuring Su-35s,” the 54-year-old diplomat added.The statements came amid fierce competition from the world’s top jet fighter producers to supply replacements for the Indonesian Air Force’s (TNI-AU) ageing F-5 E/F Tiger IIs.Last week, Spanish Ambassador to Indonesia Francisco José Viqueira Niel claimed that Eurofighter Typhoon jet fighters were the best choice for Indonesia to modernize its air force when it comes to technical capabilities and the transfer of technology.The Eurofighter consortium involves four countries, namely Spain, Germany, Italy and the UK.Another strong contender is the single-engine Swedish-built SAAB Gripe; the Flanker and Typhoon are both twin-engine jet fighters.But Galuzin talked up Russia’s military aircraft technology, claiming it was among the best in the world.This year, he added, Russia would host three international military events to showcase its advanced military technologies and capabilities.In June, the Russian Defense Ministry will host the “ARMY-2015”, an international military technical forum. About a month later, St. Petersburg will exhibit the 2015 International Maritime Defence Show.“In August, the MAKS 2015, or the 12th International Aviation and Space Salon, will be held in Moscow,” Galuzin said.Currently, the TNI AU operates a mixed fleet of single-seater Su-27s and double-seater Su-30s in the 11th squadron based at Sultan Hasanuddin Air Force Base in Makassar, South Sulawesi.In January, 2015, Indonesian Defense Ministry spokesperson Col. Djundan Eko Bintoro said that, during Galuzin’s meeting with Ryamizard, the envoy had also offered Kilo Class Type 636 submarines and Mi-17 helicopters to bolster the Indonesia’s maritime defense system. (nvn)(++++)

PA to Submit First ICC 'War Crimes' Charge on April Fools' Day-In uncanny timing, PA's first complaint against Israel over 'war crimes' including 'Gaza war and settlement activity' to come April 1.By Ari Yashar-First Publish: 3/2/2015, 6:46 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS
The Palestinian Authority (PA) will submit its first "war crimes" complaint against Israel at the International Criminal Court (ICC) on April 1, a senior official told AFP on Monday."One of the first important steps will be filing a complaint against Israel at the ICC on April 1 over the Gaza war (last summer) and settlement activity," said Mohammed Shtayyeh, a member of the executive committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).The PLO for its part is a terrorist organization that had its international recognition as such removed during the 1993 Oslo Accords which created the PA - the PA's unilateral lawsuit against Israel is in breach of those Accords.It has been noted that by turning to the ICC, the PA has left itself open to war crimes charges against it as well, particularly as PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas's Fatah faction proudly boasted of firing rockets from Gaza at Israeli civilian centers last summer in a blatant war crime.The lawsuit at the ICC also leaves the PA's "unity partner" Hamas, itself a terrorist organization with the genocide of Jews written into its very charter, open to investigation as well.Regarding the charge of "settlement activity," it was thoroughly proven in the 2012 Levy Report that Israel's presence in its Biblical heartland of Judea and Samaria is legal under international law.The ICC announced in January that it was launching a "preliminary examination" into possible war crimes committed by Israel against Palestinian Arabs.The probe was slammed by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who said, “Israel rejects the absurd decision of the ICC prosecutor. It’s absurd for the ICC to ignore international law and agreements, under which the Palestinians don't have a state and can only get one through direct negotiations with Israel."

LAND FOR PEACE (THE FUTURE 7 YEARS OF HELL ON EARTH)

JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people(ISRAEL) and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.(UPROOTED ISRAELIS AND DIVIDED JERUSALEM)(THIS BRINGS ON WW3 BECAUSE JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED,WARNING TO ARABS-MUSLIMS AND THE WORLD).

THE WEEK OF DANIEL 9:27 WE KNOW ITS 7 YRS

Heres the scripture 1 week = 7 yrs Genesis 29:27-29
27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.
28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week:(7 YEARS) and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.
29 And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.

DANIEL 11:21-23
21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24 He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he ( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant (PEACE TREATY) with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE ANIMAL SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

JEREMIAH 6:14
14 They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

JEREMIAH 8:11
11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.

1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

ISAIAH 33:8
8  The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant,(7 YR TREATY) he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man.(THE WORLD LEADER-WAR MONGER CALLS HIMSELF GOD)

JERUSALEM DIVIDED

GENESIS 25:20-26
20  And Isaac was forty years old (A BIBLE GENERATION NUMBER=1967 + 40=2007+) when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.
21  And Isaac intreated the LORD for his wife, because she was barren: and the LORD was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
22  And the children (2 NATIONS IN HER-ISRAEL-ARABS) struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the LORD.
23  And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels;(ISRAEL AND THE ARABS) and the one people shall be stronger than the other people;(ISRAEL STRONGER THAN ARABS) and the elder shall serve the younger.(LITERALLY ISRAEL THE YOUNGER RULES (ISSAC)(JACOB-LATER NAME CHANGED TO ISRAEL) OVER THE OLDER ARABS (ISHMAEL)(ESAU)
24  And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25  And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.(THE OLDER AN ARAB)
26  And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau's heel; and his name was called Jacob:(THE YOUNGER-ISRAELI) and Isaac was threescore (60) years old when she bare them.(1967 + 60=2027)(COULD BE THE LAST GENERATION WHEN JERUSALEM IS DIVIDED AMOUNG THE 2 TWINS)(THE 2 TWINS WANT JERUSALEM-THE DIVISION OF JERUSALEM TODAY)(AND WHOS IN CONTROL OF JERUSALEM TODAY-THE YOUNGER ISSAC-JACOB-ISRAEL)(AND WHO WANTS JERUSALEM DIVIDED-THE OLDER,ESAU-ISHMAEL (THE ARABS)

ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.

Herzog: I Will Evict Settlers, But Not Unilaterally-Labor Party head says he may appoint an Arab minister, as one of many gestures toward the Arab populace.By Reut Hadar, Gil Ronen-First Publish: 3/5/2015, 5:57 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS

Labor Party Chairman MK Yitzhak Herzog promises that he will not hesitate to uproot Jews from their homes as part of a peace deal and says he plans a slew of gestures toward the Arab-Israeli sector, if elected prime minister.In an interview with Ari Shavit in Haaretz, Herzog was asked about the first five actions he would take, if elected prime minister.The first thing he would do, he said, is to visit the grave of his father, former president Haim Herzog. Then he would implement plan for socio-economic change drawn up by Prof. Manuel Trajtenberg, the Zionist Camp's candidate for finance minister.Next, he said, “I will travel to Washington and meet President Obama, and open a new page with him. I will travel to Cairo and see meet President A-Sisi and see if he can bring Mahmoud Abbas back to the diplomatic track. And I will carry out gestures toward the Arab public. I may appoint an Arab minister."I will project the feeling that the period of division and internal strife is over, and that a period of healing and reconciliation is starting,” he vowed.Herzog said that his role model for this plan is former prime minister and president Shimon Peres. In his two years as prime minister in 1984-86, he said, Peres “annihilated” inflation and took the IDF out of central Lebanon. “He was huge. Simply huge. But he did it quietly, in a businesslike, professional way. In deeds, not words. I see Peres as a mentor and I will do in 2015 what he did in 1985.”Herzog said he would not agree to hand over the Golan Heights and expressed opposition to unilateral steps. He added, hoever, that he would freeze all construction outside the “settlement blocs” in Judea and Samaria."We will make fateful decisions,” he stated.Shavit asked him if he would have “the strength” to evict settlers. Herzog answered in the positive. “I will try to build a process that will bring the Palestinians to an arrangement. The decision about the Disengagement was demographically correct but its lesson is clear – one does not retreat without having someone to take over the territory.”"That is why, if it is possible to reach a permanent agreement, I will try to opt for an intermediate arrangement based on the demarcation of a boundary and the guaranteeing of security. And then, if the moment comes for evicting settlements, I will do so. But only like Begin did: in an agreement, and after talking to the settlers themselves.”

PLO Decides to End Security Cooperation with Israel-PLO decides to end security cooperation with Israel because it is withholding the PA's tax revenues.By Elad Benari-First Publish: 3/6/2015, 12:13 AM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS

The Palestine Liberation Organization's (PLO) central council decided Thursday to end security cooperation with Israel, AFP reported.The PLO council decided "to stop security cooperation in all its forms with the occupying power" which it urged to "take over full responsibility for the Palestinian people in the occupied State of Palestine, the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza".The PLO said its executive committee would meet to implement the decision taken by the central council which held a two-day meeting in Ramallah, without giving a date.The move, which Palestinian Authority (PA) chairman Mahmoud Abbas has threatened several times to carry out over the past few months, comes as a response to Israel’s decision to withhold the PA’s tax revenues. The funds are being held back from the PA in retaliation for its moves to join the International Criminal Court (ICC).The PA submitted a UN Security Council resolution in December - which was voted down - calling for Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria within two years, and in January joined the International Criminal Court, where they plan to press for war crimes against Israel.Israel has in response frozen $127 million per month in tax revenues due the PA, rendering it unable to pay tens of thousands of employees and threatening its very existence.PLO central committee member Mustapha Barghouthi said its decisions were binding on the PA "because it was the PLO which created it (the Authority) and which signed the Oslo accords".The decision spells "the end of the Oslo period, which Israel destroyed", he told AFP.Israeli military sources, quoted on Army Radio, said security cooperation was still ongoing on Thursday night, but there was no immediate official reaction from the Jewish state, which is to hold a March 17 parliamentary election.Abbas has several times threatened to cut the PA’s security coordination with Israel, the last time being before he submitted his unilateral bid to the UN.Secretary of State John Kerry recently warned that the U.S. fears that without a cash injection, the Palestinian Authority could collapse — entailing serious security implications for both Palestinians and Israelis.

Yadlin: the PA has Chosen a 'Diplomatic Intifada'-Exclusive interview: former MI chief slams Netanyahu for Congress speech, hopes to renew peace talks after elections.By Uzi Baruch, Washington-First Publish: 3/4/2015, 10:09 PM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS

Former Military Intelligence chief Amos Yadlin spoke to Arutz Sheva at the American-Israel Policy Conference (AIPAC) on Tuesday, where he opined on Iran, peace talks, and the elections, among other issues."Iran is a bitter enemy of Israel," Yadlin asserted. "Iran wants to reach a military nuclear capability. Fortunately it is not there yet, but if it was there, it would be a significant threat to Israel's security and we need to do everything to prevent Iran from attaining a nuclear bomb."Yadlin also noted that Iran's terror network throughout the Middle East is not only a global problem, but specifically that "all of these are challenges for the State of Israel."Yadlin disagreed, as well, with the hefty praise directed toward Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, opining that his Congress speech would only hurt the US-Israel relationship and negotiations with Iran as a whole."The US is an important partner in our fight against Iran; it's a major partner, and is the world's only superpower," Yadlin claimed. "The government should work with Congress and both political parties.""What the Prime Minister has done here is going behind the government by going to address Congress," he accused, adding, "it's just disturbing."Yadlin was asked if he trusts US President Barack Obama's promises to maintain Israel's security. He responded by saying that he believed Obama on that point, as well as on his alleged efforts to stop Iran's nuclear program, but added that the steps Obama may or may not have actually taken to that end are debatable.With regard to negotiations with the Palestinian Authority (PA), Yadlin stated that talks are frozen. For now, any talks with Hamas are not an option, he said, whereas PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas has led a political intifada and thus there is nothing to talk about with him, for the time being.However, he expressed hope that a "different leader" (likely Labor's Yitzhak Herzog - ed.) will replace Netanyahu, and thus renew hopes of a peace deal that could restore trust between the parties.He also justified the rampant political smear campaign against Netanyahu as a legitimate means of campaigning. 

Thursday, March 05, 2015

IRAN CLAIMES NUKE DEAL WITH THE WEST IS CLOSE.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

IRAN GUARENTEED NUKES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjj-9YgX-s0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0DaSeiPwPk

And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE

First poll since Netanyahu’s speech still shows Zionist Union leading-Herzog’s party on 24 seats, Likud on 23, but 47% want PM to continue for another term By Adiv Sterman and Ricky Ben-David March 4, 2015, 8:39 pm 15-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

Even after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Tuesday speech at the US Congress, rival Isaac Herzog’s Zionist Union party would still be the largest Knesset faction following the March 17 elections, according to a Channel 2 poll published Wednesday, the first since the Israeli leader returned from Washington.Based on the survey — conducted among 790 respondents with a 3.5% margin of error — the Zionist Union would receive 24 seats, while the Likud would gain 23.The Joint (Arab) List places third with 13 seats, Yesh Atid and Jewish Home follow with 12 each, and Kulanu with 8. Yisrael Beytenu and Meretz, as well as ultra-Orthodox parties Shas and United Torah Judaism, would all gain 6 seats, while Eli Yishai’s new Yachad party manages to just cross the electoral threshold with 4 Knesset seats.Conducted by the Midgam polling group, the survey further found that 44% of respondents believe Netanyahu’s Washington address strengthened his standings in Israel, 43% said there was no change in the Israeli leaders popularity and 12% said the prime minister had been weakened as a result of the speech.Thirty one percent of polled individuals said the main goal of Netanyahu’s address was to thwart a deal between the P5+1 world powers and Iran over the latter’s contested nuclear program, 29% said the prime minister traveled abroad mainly for campaigning purposes and 30% said they believed the Israeli leader intended to achieve both goals.Despite the slight lead for Zionist Union, 47% of those polled said they wanted to see Netanyahu serve again as prime minister, with Herzog gaining the support of only 28%. Twenty-one percent said they did not know whom they preferred.If the Likud were tasked with forming the coalition, according to Channel 2, its 23 seats could be joined with Jewish Home, 12, Yisrael Beytenu, 6, Kulanu, 8, Shas, 6, UTJ, 6 and Yachad, 4 for a total of 65 seats, giving Netanyahu a slim majority.Should the Zionist Union form a government, it could partner with Meretz’s 6 seats, Yesh Atid’s 12, Kulanu’s 8 and — two unlikely partners — Shas, 6 and Yisrael Beytenu, 6, for a total of 62 mandates, an even slimmer majority than the Likud-led constellation. Shas has said it would refuse to serve in a coalition with Lapid and Liberman has vowed never to sit in a government with Meretz.Since Netanyahu’s speech was announced in January, the prime minister’s critics have accused him of using the US Capitol stage to boost his polls ahead of Israel’s March 17 election. Supporters say his only intention is to defend his country from a looming threat.In Israel’s newspapers, responses to the speech fell along ideological lines. At the pro-Netanyahu daily Israel Hayom, Boaz Bismuth, under the headline “The speech of a historic moment,” wrote that Netanyahu succeeded in transcending politics, as “there are moments in which a leader does what he does not for votes, but for the children … There are moments in history that a leader makes happen.”Elsewhere, pundits were more skeptical of the prime minister’s goals. Nahum Barnea, a staunch Netanyahu critic at Yediot Aharonot, wrote that Netanyahu created “a golden opportunity to leave an impression on voters in Israel, and used it to the fullest.”Netanyahu has been emphasizing the Iranian nuclear threat throughout the campaign, despite polls showing that voters care more about economics this time around. Oded Eran, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, said in light of that, Netanyahu’s speech won’t influence the polls, as “there are problems of housing and cost of living and health care, and he didn’t change anything in this respect.”But at the left-wing Haaretz, Yossi Verter wrote that refocusing the campaign was the speech’s key success. Now, Israelis will all be talking about Netanyahu’s marquee issue: Iran.“It’s too early to say whether Bibi’s appearance on Capitol Hill two weeks before the election will stanch his Likud party’s steady decline in the polls and leave him in office for another term,” Verter wrote. “What’s certain is that this week will be dominated by the issue Netanyahu and his campaign staff want to highlight: security, security, security.”JTA and Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.

Day after Netanyahu warning, U.S. and Iran make 'some progress' on nuclear talks-Reuters-By Arshad Mohammed-MAR 4,15-YAHOONEWS

MONTREUX, Switzerland (Reuters) - The U.S. and Iranian foreign ministers wrapped up three days of talks over Iran's nuclear programme on Wednesday, a day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the deal being negotiated was a serious mistake.U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran's Mohammad Javad Zarif have negotiated for more than 10 hours since Monday in the Swiss lakeside town of Montreux, hoping to work out a framework deal by late March."We have made some progress but have a lot of challenges yet ahead," a senior U.S. State Department official told reporters traveling with Kerry."The bottom line here is that (there is) no deal to announce to anybody today, but very intense, hard work, some progress, but tough challenges yet to be resolved," the official said."We expect that we (and the Iranians) will regroup bilaterally, with the European Union present as well, on the 15th of March, location to be confirmed but most likely Geneva."Asked if he thought they had made progress, Zarif told reporters: "We have, but a lot of work remains."However, Netanyahu's controversial speech to the U.S. Congress on Tuesday, where he harshly criticised the diplomatic efforts to resolve the dispute, may make it harder for the Obama administration to sell the potential deal back home.U.S. negotiator Wendy Sherman will brief Israel soon on the talks and Kerry will meet the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany in Paris on Saturday, the senior U.S. official said.Netanyahu argued that rather than preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear arms, a deal would "all but guarantee" that it would one day get the atomic bomb, putting Israel, the wider region and U.S. interests at risk.U.S. President Barack Obama responded within hours saying that Netanyahu had offered no "viable alternatives" to the current course of negotiations.Iran and world powers are trying to put a framework agreement in place by the end of the month, despite the misgivings of Israel, U.S. congressional Republicans and some Gulf Arab states. Such an accord would be followed by a comprehensive agreement to be completed by the end of June.The aim of the negotiations is to persuade Iran to restrain its nuclear program in exchange for relief from sanctions that have crippled the oil exporter's economy.The United States and some of its allies, notably Israel, suspect Iran of using its civil nuclear program as a cover to develop a nuclear weapons capability. Iran denies this, saying it is for peaceful purposes such as generating electricity.(Reporting by Arshad Mohammed and Lucien Libert in Montreux; Editing by Tom Miles/Jeremy Gaunt)

Israel denounces US and EU's Iran diplomacy By Andrew Rettman-MAR 4,15-EUOBSERVER

SAN DIEGO, US, Today, 09:27-The Israeli PM’s anti-Iran speech made a big noise in Washington, but had no immediate impact on US or EU policy. in the Middle East.Republican Party congressmen, and some Democrats, in the US assembly gave Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu a roaring endorsement on Tuesday (3 March).The Israeli leader said the US and EU-brokered non-proliferation deal, currently being discussed in Switzerland, will “pave the way” for Iran to get nuclear weapons within a “year”, or maybe within “weeks”, if it decides to do so.He compared Iran to Nazi Germany, and to Isis, the apocalyptic cult in Iraq and Syria.He also described it as a threat to Israel, to US citizens, and to “all humanity”, adding “the days when Jewish people remain passive in the face of genocidal enemies are over”.US president Barack Obama boycotted Netanyahu’s visit. More than 50 congressmen from the ruling Democratic Party also boycotted the speech.They did it because they saw it as politicking ahead of Israeli elections.They also saw it as a Republican attempt to discredit Obama, with the Netanyahu event organised by the Republican speaker in Congress against White House wishes.For its part, Iran reacted mildly.Its UN ambassador, Gholamali Khoshroo, wrote in the New York Times that Netanyahu’s “scaremongering” is “a smoke screen that relegates the Palestinian question to the margins”. He added that Israeli “aggression and … occupation” of Palestine feeds Isis-type radicalism.But the event did not disrupt the so-called E3+3 nuclear talks.US secretary of state John Kerry told media in Geneva on Tuesday: "We're working away. Productively”.The EU foreign relations chief, Federica Mogherini, who chairs the E3+3 meetings after her predecessor, Catherine Ashton, became her unpaid advisor, sided with Obama."Spreading fears is not helpful at this stage," she said on the Netanyahu speech, AFP reports.Its immediate impact on E3+3 aside, the Obama-Netanyahu rift does pose questions for US, and by extension, EU policy in the Middle East.Analysts say it makes Netanyahu less likely to launch air strikes on Iran - an option he has repeatedly mentioned - while Obama is in power.It also makes Obama less likely to try to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks if Netanyahu is re-elected.Alon Ben-Meir, an international relations scholar at New York University, says the EU, in any case, appears willing to hang on to US coat-tails.“For all intents and purposes, the US has assumed the leading role and Iran also understands that only the US will have, in the final analysis, the last word on any [nuclear] deal that the parties may agree upon”, he told EUobserver.He added that the depth of the US-Israel rift shouldn’t be exaggerated.The State Department, one week prior to Netanyahu’s inflammatory visit, asked Congress for another $3 billion in aid for Israel. Ben-Meir noted that Obama and Netanyahu fundamentally agree that Iran must be stopped from gaining hegemony in the region.“The Obama administration … is currently developing a strategy of containment not related only to the prospect that Iran may obtain [nuclear] weapons, but also on how to contain the fallout of a potential US military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities should that option become necessary", he said.He also said there are limits to how far the US will push Israel to make peace with Palestine.“The US, not now or at any time in the future, will impose sanctions on Israel, nor would it encourage the EU to do so”.

JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35  Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36  And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37  For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)

Ten senators tell McConnell they object to fast tracking Iran bill-Democrats object to Republican majority leader’s bid to bypass committee vote, let talks go uninterrupted until end of March By JTA March 5, 2015, 1:32 am-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

Ten senators who caucus with Democrats are objecting to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s plan to bring the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 directly to the Senate floor for a vote, thereby bypassing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.The senators, among them Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), sent a letter to McConnell urging him not to fast track the bill, but rather to allow for negotiations with Iran to continue until at least the March 24 deadline for a political framework agreement. Because a final agreement is not expected until June, there is no reason to rush the vote, the senators wrote.“We are disappointed that you have proceeded outside of regular order, which suggests that the goal of this maneuver is to score partisan political points, rather than pursue a substantive strategy to counter Iran’s nuclear ambitions,” the senators wrote.The senators also wrote they would only vote for the bill after it has gone through regular procedures and been debated by the Foreign Relations Committee. Signing the letter were Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), Bill Nelson (D-Fl.), Joe Donnelly (D-In.), Angus King (I-Me.), Chris Coons (D-De), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)

Nuclear deal with West ‘very close’, Zarif says-Iranian Foreign Minister claims Iran has no interest in nuclear bombs, says Netanyahu is ‘fanning hysteria’By Daniel Bernstein and AP March 5, 2015, 12:29 am 2-the times of israel

Iran is “very close” to achieving a nuclear deal with international powers, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Wednesday.Speaking to NBC News, Zarif said Iran is not seeking to build nuclear weapons. “We do not believe nuclear weapons bring security to anybody, certainly not to us,” Zarif said, adding that he hoped the emerging deal would ensure that Iran’s nuclear program “will always remain peaceful.”He further stated that Iran is prepared to work “around the clock” in order to reach an agreement, which he says is very close.The Foreign Minister claimed the country’s nuclear ambitions are entirely peaceful, intended only for “scientific” advancement. He said a deal will be made possible “once this fear mongering is out,” possibly referring to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s congress speech Tuesday, in which he assailed the emerging nuclear deal and warned it “paves Iran’s path to the bomb.”“There may be people who may have been affected by the type of hysteria that is being fanned by people like Mr. Netenyahu,” Zarif said, adding that “it is useful for everybody to allow this deal to go through.”Zarif said he hoped to reach a deal that would ensure that Iran’s nuclear program “will always remain peaceful.”A senior US official spoke of some progress Wednesday in reaching a nuclear deal with Iran but tamped down expectations of a formal, preliminary deal this month outlining constraints on Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief for the Islamic Republic.The official said the negotiations are aiming for a much looser construct — “an understanding that’s going to have to be filled out with lots of detail” by their late March target date.Once Iran and the six nations negotiating with it reach such a progress report, US President Barack Obama will then determine whether it is grounds to continue talks aimed at a comprehensive deal in June, the official said.Zarif told NBC reaching the deal is now mainly a political issue. “We are very close if the political decision can be made to get to yes, as President Obama said,” he said.

Wednesday, March 04, 2015

MAR 04,2015 11EST-6PM ISRAEL TIME-PURIM IN ISRAEL TODAY

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

PURIM SCRIPTURES
http://www.jewfaq.org/holiday9.htm
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2008/03/purim-in-israel-today.html
PURIM TO PASSOVER SCRIPTURES
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2008/03/purim-to-passover-scriptures.html

NETANYAHU TELLS SENATE LEADERSHIP.HE IS MOVED BY THEIR SUPPORT.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

THE 12TH IMAM MAHDI DEATH WORLD CULT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCPd9uoqChA
OTHER ISRAEL-NETANYAHU STORIES ABOUT TRIP TO AMERICA
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-biggest-threat-now-is-apocalyptic.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/03/benjamin-netanyahus-speeches-at.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/03/i-wish-our-canadian-prime-minister.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/02/benjamin-netanyahu-canada-is-with-you.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/03/benjamin-netanyahu-arrives-in.html

Netanyahu tells Senate leadership he is ‘moved’ by support-After speech to Congress, PM meets with legislators, emphasizing than any nuclear agreement must include more restrictions-By Lazar Berman March 4, 2015, 1:14 am-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

After his speech to the joint houses of Congress, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met Tuesday with the bipartisan leadership of the US Senate, saying he was “moved” by the response from both parties.Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) and minority leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) had invited Netanyahu to the meeting.“I do want to thank the leadership of the Senate, Republicans and Democrats, both sides of the aisle, for inviting me here, giving me an opportunity to state Israel’s concern about an issue that could be the most important issue of our times,” Netanyahu told the senators.“I was very moved by the attention and the responses to the speech from both sides of the aisle, and it’s very clear to me and it was clear in that hall to anyone who was there that the support for Israel is strongly bipartisan, that there is a very broad support of the American people and its representative for the Jewish state and I’m very, very grateful for that,” he added.Netanyahu said that an agreement with Iran must not automatically expire, but should lift restrictions only after Tehran stops supporting terrorism, halts aggression against neighboring countries, and ceases its promises to annihilate Israel. He also called for greater restrictions on Iran under the agreement. Senators John Barrasso (R-Wyoming), John Thune (R-South Dakota), Dianne Feinstein (D-California), John McCain (R-Arizona), Al Franken (D-Minnesota), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Charles Schumer (D-New York), Richard Durbin (D-Illinois) and Bob Corker (D-Tennessee) were also in attendance.Earlier in the day, Netanyahu warned in his landmark address that the nuclear deal taking shape between Iran and Western powers “paves the path for Iran” to a nuclear arsenal, rather than blocking it, and urged American leaders to walk away from what he called “a very bad deal.”The emerging agreement, he told the assembled congressmen and senators, would leave Tehran with “a vast nuclear infrastructure” that placed it dangerously close to the ability to break out to a nuclear bomb. It “will not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. It will all but guarantee that Iran will get nuclear weapons and a lot of them.”“Iran has proven time and again that it cannot be trusted,” no matter what it says about permitting verification of the terms of any accord designed to prevent it from getting such weapons, he said. “This is a bad deal, it’s a very bad deal. We’re better off without it.”

In blistering speech, PM warns ‘bad’ deal ‘paves path’ to Iranian nukes-Netanyahu evokes upcoming holiday of Purim in accusing Tehran of seeking to annihilate the Jewish people; Congress responds with enthusiastic applause-By Itamar Sharon and Marissa Newman March 3, 2015, 6:48 pm Updated: March 3, 2015, 8:02 pm 52-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Tuesday in a landmark address to the joint houses of Congress that a nuclear deal taking shape between Iran and Western powers “paves the path for Iran” to a nuclear arsenal, rather than blocking it, and urged American leaders to walk away from what he called “a very bad deal.”The emerging agreement, he told the assembled congresspeople and senators, would leave Tehran with “a vast nuclear infrastructure” that placed it dangerously close to the ability to break out to a nuclear bomb. It “will not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. It will all but guarantee that Iran will get nuclear weapons and a lot of them.”“Iran has proven time and again that it cannot be trusted,” no matter what it says about permitting verification of the terms of any accord designed to prevent it from getting such weapons, he said. “This is a bad deal, it’s a very bad deal. We’re better off without it.”Netanyahu spoke shortly after Secretary of US State John Kerry met for more than two hours in Switzerland with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in the hopes of completing an international framework agreement later this month to curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.But Netanyahu said that while the emerging agreement did place certain limitations on Iran’s nuclear program, they would not be enough to prevent a nuclear breakout within “about a year by US assessment, a bit shorter by Israel’s.”He further criticized the reported clause that would see many of the limitations placed on Iran lifted after a period of 10 years. A decade, he said, was “a blink of an eye” for a nation.Netanyahu also dismissed the effectiveness of United Nations inspections on Iran’s nuclear sites, saying, “Inspectors document violations, they don’t stop them. Inspectors knew when North Korea broke out to the bomb but that didn’t stop (the North Koreans).”“The greatest danger facing our world is the marriage of militant Islam with nuclear weapons,” he said. He predicted that the agreement, as it stands, would change the region for the worse, create a nuclear arms race and turn the Middle East into a “nuclear tinderbox.”In the two years since the P5+1 nations began their negotiations with Tehran, Netanyahu claimed, Tehran had not moderated but had in fact been emboldened and radicalized.While negotiating, Iran was backing terrorism against Israel as well as threatening American interests throughout the Middle East.He said that with the concessions the United States was prepared to make, Iran would not only gain nuclear weapons, but also eventually become free of international economic sanctions. As a result, he said, it would be emboldened to finance even more terrorism around the Middle East and the world.The result for Iran, he said, would be “aggression abroad and prosperity at home.”The world should insist “Iran change its behavior,” Netanyahu pleaded. “If Iran wants to be treated like a normal country, let it act like a normal country.”The US, the prime minister insisted, must keep up pressure “on a very vulnerable regime,” particularly given dropping oil prices. If Iranians walk away from the negotiations, he said, they’ll come back, “because they need the deal a lot more than you do.”“History has placed us at a fateful crossroads,” Netanyahu said. The world, he asserted, must choose between a path that will lead to “a nuclear-armed Iran whose unbridled aggression will inevitably lead to war” and a more difficult path that will, in the long run, prevent Tehran from becoming a regional aggressor.He stressed that the alternative to a bad deal was not war: “It’s a much better deal.”Instead, he called for a deal that would keep restrictions in place “until Iran’s aggression ends,” that wouldn’t “give Iran an easy path to the bomb.” He called for a deal that Israel may not love, “but with which we can live — literally.”Before lifting sanctions, he said, the world should demand Iran cease its attacks against other countries in the region, stop supporting terrorism around the world, and “stop threatening to annihilate my country, Israel, the one and only Jewish state.”Evoking the holiday of Purim, which commemorates the Jewish people’s survival of a Persian plot to destroy them, the prime minister said: “Today the Jewish people face another attempt by yet another Persian potentate to destroy it. Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei spews the oldest hatred of anti-Semitism with new technology. He tweets in English that Israel must be destroyed.”Netanyahu likened the Iranian threat to that posed by Islamic State and warned that Iran’s actions against IS (also known as ISIS) did not make it an ally of the US. “Don’t be fooled. The battle between Iran and ISIS doesn’t turn Iran into a friend of America,” he said. Both, he maintained, were competing to be the flag-bearers of radical Islam.“The difference is that ISIS is armed with butcher knives, captured weapons and YouTube while Iran may soon be armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles armed with nuclear warheads,” he declared. “When it comes to Iran and ISIS, the enemy of your enemy is your enemy.”The Israeli leader’s appeal to Congress at the invitation of House Speaker John Boehner — but without coordination with the administration — triggered a political furor in the United States. It put Israel on a collision course with the Obama administration as it negotiates with Iran over its nuclear program. Additionally, with only two weeks to go before Netanyahu faces general elections in Israel, the speech has also sparked accusations at home that he was insisting on the speech and defying the White House chiefly in order to boost his appeal with right-wing voters.The White House expressed its displeasure with the appearance by word and deed, dispatching Vice President Joe Biden on an overseas trip that meant he did not fill his customary seat behind the House rostrum during the speech. Nor did Obama meet at the White House with Netanyahu on his trip to the United States.More than four dozen House and Senate Democrats said in advance they would not attend the event, a highly unusual move given historically close ties between the two allies — but one that many complained Netanyahu had forced upon them by making them choose between Israel’s leader and their president.During his speech, the prime minister said he was keenly aware of the controversy created by his address and said it was not at all his intention.Netanyahu took great pains to express his gratitude to Obama for his continued support to Israel. He said he was “deeply humbled” by the opportunity to speak for a third time to “the most important legislative body in the world,” and thanked it for its support of Israel “year after year, decade after decade.”“I know that no matter on which side of the aisle you sit, you stand with Israel,” he said. The “remarkable alliance” between the US and Israel “has always been above politics, and it must always remain above politics.”“It was never [his] intention” that his address to Congress would be conceived as political, Netanyahu said. But he believed he had “a profound obligation” to come, because he felt the Iranian nuclear program could threaten the Jewish state.Netanyahu received a decidedly warm reception from the assembled members of Congress. The prime minister was greeted with a roaring welcome as he walked down the same center aisle of the House chamber that presidents tread before their annual State of the Union speeches. Republicans applauded Netanyahu’s remarks frequently, rising to their feet. Democratic lawmakers were far more restrained, although they cheered the Israeli leader’s praise for Obama. In all, he received 25 standing ovations.Despite Democratic stayaways, the chamber and galleries were filled to capacity. Netanyahu singled out Holocaust Survivor Elie Wiesel, a world-renowned author, academic and activist.“I wish I could promise you, Elie, that the lessons of history have been learned,” he said, to cheers.A few moments later, he added, the applause swelling, “The days when the Jewish people remained passive in the face of genocidal enemies are over.”“Even if Israel has to stand alone, Israel will stand,” he vowed, although he quickly added: “I know that Israel does not stand alone. I know that America stands with Israel. I know that you stand with Israel.”–  AP and Times of Israel staff contributed

Netanyahu bashes Iran deal, but no longer demands zero enrichment-PM failed to offer concrete proposals how to curb nuclear threat, but hinted he would back agreement Israel ‘may not like, but could live with’By Raphael Ahren March 4, 2015, 1:59 am-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

The speech had everything you’d expect: A solid case against letting Israel’s “genocidal enemies” anywhere near nuclear weapons, a cut and dried rejection of Western rapprochement with Iran, tributes to the unbreakable bond between Israel and the United States, Purim references, Elie Wiesel, the Holocaust, and even Moses. But major surprises there were few.In his controversial address to a joint meeting of Congress Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not reveal any hitherto unknown details from the nuclear negotiations with Iran, as some had feared. He also did not present the world with a concrete and pragmatic policy proposal outlining how the Islamic Republic’s march toward nuclearization could be stopped, as some had hoped.US President Barack Obama said “there was nothing new” in the speech. True, that Netanyahu would vehemently oppose the currently discussed deal was as clear as his Iran-North Korea comparison. It is noteworthy, nevertheless, that Netanyahu did not repeat his much-stated position that Iran may not retain any uranium enrichment, a maximalist demand US National Security Advisor Susan Rice Monday called “neither realistic nor achievable.”Rather, Netanyahu seemed somewhat pragmatic when he hinted that Israel was willing to consider even an imperfect deal, as long as it’s not as imperfect as the one currently on the table.Netanyahu’s speech was masterly, less because of the abundant rhetorical shtick (such as the awkward line saying the Iran deal would be “a farewell to arms control”) but because he delivered a concise point-by-point argumentation of why the prospective agreement is so bad for Israel and world peace.Despite the friendly and ostensibly moderate face that the Iranian government puts on for the world, Netanyahu said, at its core, it is still the same murderous, freedom-hating regime that wants to wipe Israel and American off the map.“Last year, [Iranian Foreign Minister Javad] Zarif who charms Western diplomats laid a wreath at the grave of [slain Hezbollah commander] Imad Mughniyeh,” Netanyahu said, in a thinly veiled attack against US Secretary of State John Kerry, who at the time of speech was meeting with said Zarif trying to finalize the deal. “Imad Mughniyeh is the terrorist mastermind who spilled more American blood than any other terrorist besides Osama bin Laden. I’d like to see someone ask him a question about that.”The first major concession of the prospective deal is that it leaves Iran with thousands of centrifuges, Netanyahu lamented. That would allow the regime to attempt a breakout toward the bomb in a very short time, and even the toughest inspection regime would be powerless to do anything about it, he argued.“True, certain restrictions would be imposed on Iran’s nuclear program and Iran’s adherence to those restrictions would be supervised by international inspectors. But here’s the problem. You see, inspectors document violations; they don’t stop them.” Iran, he added, not only defies inspectors, “it also plays a pretty good game of hide-and-cheat with them.”Citing leaked details about the deal, Netanyahu then railed against the so-called sunset clause of the developing agreement, which stipulates that after a decade the deal expires, “Iran would then be free to build a huge nuclear capacity that could product many, many nuclear bombs,” the prime minister warned. This concession, he noted, was even worse than leaving Iran with uranium enrichment capability.In another swipe at Kerry, Netanyahu quoted the secretary of state as saying that Iran could “legitimately possess” massive centrifuge capacity after the agreement ends. “Now I want you to think about that,” Netanyahu said. “The foremost sponsor of global terrorism could be weeks away from having enough enriched uranium for an entire arsenal of nuclear weapons and this with full international legitimacy.”Netanyahu’s bottom line: this deal doesn’t prevent Iran from getting the bomb, it practically hands Iran the bomb on a silver plate.But the prime minister didn’t suffice with attacking the contours of the prospective deal. He went on to assail the very idea that Iran could be welcomed back into the family of nations — a notion that guides the current administration’s various Middle East policies.The ayatollahs have been ruling in Tehran for over a generation and there is no reason to hope for regime change, Netanyahu posited. Worse, this deal would only increase its “voracious appetite for aggression.”Iran needs to fulfill three conditions before the international community can lift any sanctions, Netanyahu demanded: Halt its aggression against Sunni states in the Middle East, cease supporting terrorism around the world, and stop threatening to annihilate Israel.“If the world powers are not prepared to insist that Iran change its behavior before a deal is signed, at the very least they should insist that Iran change its behavior before a deal expires,” he said.Despite having warned of the regime’s fanatical nature and lack of trustworthiness, in this segment he appeared to signal that if the world already wants to sign a deal, it should at least try to get as much out of it as possible.The alternative to the current deal is not war, Netanyahu asserted, but a superior agreement that could be obtained if only the West applied more pressure on Iran. “A better deal that doesn’t leave Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure and such a short breakout time.” In other words, a deal in which Iran can keep not a “vast” but a perhaps a medium- or small-sized nuclear infrastructure, would be a different story. Not a short but a somewhat longer breakout wouldn’t be great, but it might be something we can talk about, he appeared to intimate.To be sure: Netanyahu opposed the interim deal with Iran and will vehemently reject any agreement he deems dangerous to Israel — and as can be seen from his position regarding security arrangements in a possible peace deal with the Palestinians, he will be very difficult to satisfy. And yet, in his speech, Netanyahu said he hoped for a “better deal that Israel and its neighbors may not like, but with which we could live.” Such a deal might very well be impossible, but Netanyahu appears to indicate that he is willing to consider a deal that is less bad, and that he realized his zero enrichment demand is indeed, as Susan Rice said, an “unachievable ideal.” Whether making all these points — the unambiguous rejection of the current deal and the subtle indication that a still imperfect but better deal might be acceptable — was worth risking Jerusalem’s relations with Washington is a matter of partisan dispute.The way with which American and Israeli politicos reacted to the speech hence also didn’t shock anyone. As Israeli political communications experts Gadi Wolfsfeld predicted last week, the speech was a classic example of a Rorscharch test. Those sympathetic to the prime minister felt he convincingly made the case against the prospective nuclear agreement and masterfully deconstructed the American administration’s talking points on why the offer currently on the table would be a good deal.Deputy Foreign Minister Tzachi Hanegbi after the speech indicated that it might have actually moved Congress into actively opposing the prospective nuclear deal with Iran, and Republican lawmakers, in their initial reactions, demanded that “Congress must assert its role and responsibility as a co-equal branch in the safety of America and Israel,” as Doug Lamborn of Colorado put it.Those on the other side of the argument agreed with Obama that the much-hyped speech offered little new, indicating that the fuss was for nothing. For a nice but eventually ineffective speech, Netanyahu caused untold damage to Israel’s strategically important partnership with the US, they opined.“I was near tears throughout the prime minister’s speech — saddened by the insult to the intelligence of the United States” and its negotiating partners, “and saddened by the condescension toward our knowledge of the threat posed by Iran and our broader commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation,” Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said.Isaac Herzog, Netanyahu’s rival for the premiership, said regardless of how eloquent the speech was, it failed to thwart Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, or even to slow them down one bit, to which Netanyahu’s Likud party responded that the left puts cheap political shots over national security.Now that Netanyahu’s historic speech is history, it’s back to politics as usual.

Obama dismisses Netanyahu’s Congress speech as ‘nothing new’-Minority leader Pelosi says PM’s Iran deal criticism ‘condescending’ toward Americans’ intelligence, but some Democrats speak out in support of Israeli leader-By Rebecca Shimoni Stoil and AFP March 3, 2015, 10:22 pm 99-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL

WASHINGTON — US President Barack Obama said Tuesday afternoon that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “didn’t offer any viable alternatives” to the current negotiations with Iran in his speech to Congress earlier in the day.The White House had said Obama would likely not watch the entire address but the president said he had read a transcript of Netanyahu’s speech.“As far as I can tell, there was nothing new,” he told reporters ahead of a meeting with Defense Secretary Ashton Carter.In his speech, Netanyahu assailed an emerging nuclear deal with Iran and told Congress that the negotiations between the two countries would “all but guarantee” that Tehran gets nuclear weapons to the detriment of the entire world. The invitation to Netanyahu to address Congress, extended by House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican, has triggered a political furor in the United States. Meanwhile, Netanyahu’s opponents in Israel accused him of staging the speech as an campaign ploy.The president said Netanyahu made almost the same speech when he warned against an interim deal reached with Iran. He maintained that the interim deal had resulted in a freeze and rolling back of Iran’s nuclear program.Obama added that Netanyahu’s alternative to talks amounted to no deal at all. That, he noted, would lead Iran to redouble its efforts to build a nuclear bomb.“We don’t yet have a deal. But if we are successful, this will be the best deal possible with Iran to prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon,” he said.“On the core issue, which is how do we prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, which would make it far more dangerous and would give it scope for even greater action in the region, the prime minister didn’t offer any viable alternatives,” he said.Taking a thinly veiled swipe at the prime minister, whose address appeared aimed at persuading legislators to block a deal if it comes to the Senate floor for a vote, Obama noted that the US has a system of government where “foreign policy runs through the executive branch and the president, not through other channels.”Other officials also accused the prime minister of lacking any innovation and merely criticizing others’ plans.An unnamed senior US official told CNN that the prime minister’s speech has “literally not one new idea; not one single concrete alternative; all rhetoric, no action.”“Without a deal, Iran will certainly advance its program — installing advanced centrifuges, fueling its plutonium reactor and reducing or eliminating its breakout timeline. That would leave us with the choice of accepting a nuclear-threshold Iran or taking military action,” the official said.“Simply demanding that Iran completely capitulate is not a plan, nor would any country support us in that position,” the official added. “The prime minister offered us no concrete action plan.” Netanyahu faced still harsher criticism from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Illinois), who said that she was “near tears” during Netanyahu’s speech.Describing Netanyahu’s speech as an “insult to the intelligence of the United States as part of the P5+1 nations,” Pelosi said that she was “saddened by the condescension toward our knowledge of the threat posed by Iran and our broader commitment to preventing nuclear proliferation.”Pelosi, who was an early and outspoken opponent of the prime minister’s speech, reiterated that “the unbreakable bonds between the United States and Israel are rooted in our shared values, our common ideals and mutual interests” and emphasized that “ours is a deep and abiding friendship that will always reach beyond party.”Pelosi was notably cold and visibly disinterested throughout the speech, capping her indignation by standing up immediately to leave the room before Netanyahu made his way outside through the throngs of applauding legislators.Other Democratic congressmen agreed.The speech was “fear-mongering” that was “straight out of the Dick Cheney playbook,” Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Kentucky) told reporters, referring to the hawkish Bush-era vice president.Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Oregon), one of about 60 Democratic congresspeople who boycotted Netanyahu’s speech, said the Israeli leader has time and again gruffly pushed the United States towards war.“I’ve listened to his alarmist predictions. I listened to him cheerlead for the United States’ greatest single blunder in our history, the Iraq war,” Blumenauer said. In Tuesday’s address, he added, Netanyahu “gave no alternative path forward, just…a series of demands.”Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (D-Illinois) too, bristled at Netanyahu’s approach.“What I heard today felt to me like an effort to stampede the United States into war once again,” Schakowsky said.Not all Democrats, however, shared such an acerbic take on the speech.Rep. Nita Lowey (D-New York) and fellow New Yorker Rep. Eliot Engel were among the Democrats who defended the prime minister’s position while treading a delicate balance to avoid criticizing Obama.Engel, a co-chair of the bipartisan Congressional Israel Allies Caucus, defended Netanyahu’s speech as reflective of a bipartisan consensus. “Netanyahu’s speech showed that there remain serious and urgent concerns about the nuclear negotiations with Iran,” he wrote after the address. “These are not new — and many of them are shared by Republicans and Democrats, including officials in the Obama administration.”Engel asserted that “I expect that Democrats and Republicans will move forward together in the interest of our national security and strengthening the US-Israel relationship.”Lowey, the Ranking Member on the House Appropriations Committee, wrote in a statement that “Prime Minister Netanyahu made a powerful presentation to members of Congress regarding the threat of a nuclear Iran.”Lowey noted that she “shares the prime minister’s concerns regarding the P5+1 negotiations,” calling on the United States and Israel to “jointly confront the Iranian challenge.”At the House chamber Netanyahu received a decidedly warm reception. Republicans applauded Netanyahu’s remarks frequently, rising to their feet. Democratic lawmakers were far more restrained, although they cheered the Israeli leader when he praised Obama’s efforts on Israel’s behalf. In all, the premier received 25 standing ovations.“I am encouraged by the bipartisan reception given to the prime minister, and hope all Americans focus on the substance of the prime minister’s concerns,” House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said afterwards.White House spokesman Josh Earnest said in a press briefing following the address that the US did not believe that there was a real possibility of getting Iran to sign a better deal than the draft agreement as leaked over the past few days.“The president has made as his priority resolving the broader international community’s concerns with their nuclear program. Military actions, we know, would fall far short of that,” he said.“The strategy that the president has laid out is the best possibility,” Earnest added, referring to the plan by which Iran would be at least one year away from breaking out to a nuclear bomb.Earnest once again insisted that the fact that Obama wouldn’t meet Netanyahu during his visit was purely due to the fact that Netanyahu was heading for an election and “does not reflect a change in policy” regarding US-Israeli relations.On Monday, in response to reports that Netanyahu could reveal sensitive details of the Iran talks during his very public speech, Obama administration officials including National Security Adviser Susan Rice issued dire warnings against revealing too much information during the speech before Congress.Reports have indicated the US is seeking a deal that would keep Iran from pursuing a nuclear weapon for 10 years, before allowing Tehran to ramp enrichment back up.But Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said on Tuesday that his country would never give in to the “greedy demands” of other countries, rebuffing comments from Obama on a 10-year curb of nuclear activities as “unacceptable.”Times of Israel staff and AP contributed to this report. 

Tuesday, March 03, 2015

OBAMA-KERRY-RICE-ALL TELL CONGRESS-SENATE.DO NOT LISTEN TO WHAT BENJAMIN NETANYAHU HAS TO SAY.WE KNOW WHATS BEST FOR ISRAEL-IRAN.ISRAEL BETTER CHILL AND NOT REVEAL OUR LIES TO THE WORLD OF STICKING UP FOR IRAN HAVING NUKES.

JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)

THE 12TH IMAM MAHDI DEATH WORLD CULT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCPd9uoqChA
OTHER ISRAEL-NETANYAHU STORIES ABOUT TRIP TO AMERICA
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/03/the-biggest-threat-now-is-apocalyptic.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/03/i-wish-our-canadian-prime-minister.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/02/benjamin-netanyahu-canada-is-with-you.html
http://israndjer.blogspot.ca/2015/03/benjamin-netanyahu-arrives-in.html

ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST

1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.

ISAIAH 41:11
11  Behold, all they that were incensed against thee (ISRAEL) shall be ashamed and confounded: they shall be as nothing;(DESTROYED) and they that strive with thee shall perish.(ISRAEL HATERS WILL BE TOTALLY DESTROYED)

ISRAELS TROUBLE

JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.

DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)

WE KNOW BY THE BIBLE.ISRAEL TAKES CARE OF IRANS NUKE SITES.NOT NO NEGOTIATED DEAL BY THE OBUMMER-OBAMANATION ADMINISTRATION.

JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35  Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36  And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37  For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)

 UPDATE TUE MAR 03,2015-12:40PM
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION SAYS NETANYAHUS SPEECH WAS ALL RHEDERIC.NO ACTION.I SAY IT WAS A GREAT SPEECH BY BENJAMIN NETANYAHU.BENJAMIN EVEN THANKED THE ADMINISTRATION.EVEN THOUGH THEY SNUBBED NETANYAHU OFF MANY TIMES IN THE LAST 6 YEARS.BIBI WANTS THE SANCTIONS RAMPED UP ON IRAN.AND ISRAEL WANTS IRAN STOPPED TOTALLY FROM HAVING NUCLEAR WEAPONS. IRAN GOT ENOUGH POWER IN THE MIDEAST ALREADY.IF IRAN IS ALLOWED A GOOD DEAL WITH AMERICA.THEY WILL THEN HAVE GLOBAL DOMINANCE. AND IF THEY ARE ALLOWED TO HAVE THE BOMBS.IRAN WILL HAVE GLOBAL CONTROL AND WILL BE ABLE TO NUKE WHOEVER THEY WANT.AND OF COURSE THAT MEANS. THAT IRAN WILL WANT THEIR WELLBOY MAHDI TO COME OUTTA THE WELL IN COOM. SO AS SOON AS IRAN GETS A NUKE BUILT.GUESS WERE IT GOES WORLD.RIGHT TO ISRAEL.SO IRAN CAN KILL MILLIONS OF JEWS.AND THIS WILL BRING THE WELLBOY MAHDI OUT OF THE WELL. WERE HE HAS BEEN LIVING FOR AT LEAST 1,400 YEARS.AND HE WILL LEAD ISLAM TO KILL EVERY INFIDEL NON MUSLIM THAT WILL NOT CONVERT TO SHARIA LAW ISLAM.IN IRAN RIGHT NOW.THE WELL IN COOM WERE THIS WELL MAHDI IS LIVING IN.IS A SACRED PLACE.AND AHMADINEJAD ACTUALLY BUILT A ROAD TO THE WELL.SO WHEN IRAN KILLS MILLIONS OF JEWS THROUGH CHAOS.AND WHEN THE MAHDI COMES OUTTA THE WELL -THEN.HE WILL HAVE A ROAD TO WALK ON IN IRAN TO WERE THE MAHDI WILL BE LEAD TO REVEAL HIMSELF TO THE ISLAMIC-MUSLIM WORLD.TO LEAD MUSLIMS WORLDWIDE.UNDER A CALIPHATE.WERE ISLAM WILL RULE THE WHOLE EARTH.UNDER SHARIA LAW.AND GUESS WHAT.ALL CHRISTIANS- JEWS WILL BE KILLED FOR NOT CONVERTING TO ISLAM.THIS WILL ALSO NCLUDE- NEW AGE NUTCASES, ATHIESTS, COMMUNISTS ,HINDUS, BUDISTS.ANYONE WHO DOES NOT CONVERT TO ISLAM ON EARTH WILL BE BEHEADED-SLAUGHTERED-RAPED-TORTURED THEN KILLED.

IT SEEMS SNOWDEN WANTS TO COME BACK TO AMERICA.AND PETRAEUS HAS ADMITED SHARING SECRETS WITH PAULA BRODWELL HIS GIRL FREIND AND WILL PAY A FINE.ALSO TODAY BOEHNER COULD ALLOW A DHS FUNDING VOTE TODAY IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF HOURS.TO START FRESH BILL.ALSO HILIARY CLINTON WHEN  SHE WAS SECRETARY OF STATE.HAD A PERSONAL PRIVATE E-MAIL ACCOUNT- INSTEAD OF A GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT.I WONDER HOW MANY BENGHAZI E-MAILS WILL MAGICALLY BE DISAPPEARED LIKE THAT OTHER SCANDEL WITH THE WOMAN THAT WAS A BIAS AGAINST CHRISTIANS AND SO CALLED LOST MILLIONS OF E-MAILS.WHICH WERE RECENTLY FOUND.CLINTO KEPT 55,000 E-MAILS TO GIVE TO THE GOVERNMENT.BUT I WONDER HOW MANY BENGHAZI E-MAILS WILL BE MISSING.CAN YOU SAY ALL.I CAN.


UPDATE TUE MAR 03,2015-05:03AM
KERRY-RICE AND OBAMA WERE ON THE SERCATE YESTERDAY. SAYING HOW BENJAMIN NETANYAHU WAS GONNA SPILL THE SECRETS OF THE NEGOTIATIONS ON THE NUKE DEAL BETWEEN AMERICA AND IRAN.OR THE P5 PLUS ONE THEY CALL IT.SO THAT THE CONGRESS WILL STOP OBAMA IN HIS TRACKS FROM CONTINUING ANY DEAL WITH IRAN.THE MESSAGE FROM OBAMA-KERRY-RICE WAS-CONGRESS:DO NOT LISTEN TO BENJAMIN NETANYAHU.KEEP HIM AND ISRAEL OUTTA THE NUKE TALKS.ONLY LET ME OBAMA AND RICE AND KERRY DO NEGOTIATIONS.CONGRESS DO NOT STOP US WE KNOW WHATS BEST FOR ISRAEL. JUST IGNORE ANYTHING BENJAMIN NETANYAHU SAYS IN HIS SPEECH TODAY AT 10AM.THIS IS WHAT I HEARD FROM KERRY-OBAMA AND RICES MOUTH.THEY DO NOT WANT WHATS BEST FOR ISRAEL.OR THEY WOULD AUTOMATICALLY STOP NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN.AND WOULD GO USE BUNKER BUSTER BOMBS ON IRANS NUKE SITES TO DESTROY THEM TOTALLY.NO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRAT ION WANT IRAN TO MAKE NUKES.THEY CLAIM IRAN WILL NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE A NUKE FOR A YEAR WITH THEIR NEGOTIATION DEAL.BUT IF THE DEAL FAILS. IRAN COULD HAVE A NUKE WITHIN A MONTH OR SO.WELL EITHER WAY IRAN CAN HAVE THE ATOMIC BOMB WITHIN A MONTH.IT SURE DOES NOT MATTER IF THE WHITEHOUSE NEGOTIATES WITH IRAN OR NOT.AND EVEN IF THIS P5 PLUS ONE DEAL IS SIGNED.AT THE END OF THE 10 YEARS.IRAN HAS A CLAUSE IN THE DEAL. THAT SAYS IRAN CAN MAKE BOMBS AFTER THE 10 YEARS IS UP.NO MATTER WHAT.CONGRESS I SAY LISTEN CLOSELY TO BENJAMIN NETANYAHU TODAY AT 10AM.AND STOP OBAMA-KERRY AND RICE FROM THE NEGOTIATIONS WITH IRAN IMMEDIATELY.TELL THEM.AMERICA WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH A ISRAEL HATING COUNTRY. AND THEN CONGRESS-SENATE MAKE A BILL INSTANTLY THAT SAYS.WE ATTACK IRANS NUCLEAR STES IMMEDATELY.TO GET RID OF IRANS NUCLEAR WEAPONS.SO ISRAEL AND THE MIDEAST WILL NOT HAVE TO EVER WORYY ABOUT IRAN AQUIRING NUCLEAR WEAPONS EVER AGAIN.SO CONGRESS-SENATE OF AMERICA.LISTEN TO BIBI-NOT OBAMA-RICE- KERRY.THE ISRAEL HATERS.ESPECIALLY OBAMA-BIDEN.THAT WILL NOT EVEN ATTEND THE SPEECH.SO HOW CAN OBAMA-BIDEN-KERRY-RICE WANNA HELP ISRAEL. IF THESE NOSE IN THE AIR-BRAINWASHED 4 PEOPLE-CLAIME THEY WANNA HELP ISRAEL BY STOPPING IRAN FROM GETTING THE BOMB.YET THEIR ACTIONS BY SKIPPING BIBIS SPEECH TODAY.SAYS.WE STICK UP FOR IRAN.AND WANT THEM TO MAKE BOMBS BY THEIR ACTIONS.THESE 4 WORDS MEAN NOTHING.THEIR ACTIONS SAY-CONGRESS-SENATE-DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYTHING NETANYAHU SAYS TODAY. JUST LISTEN TO ME OBAMA-RICE-KERRY.WE KNOW WHATS BEST FOR ISRAEL.ISRAEL DOES NOT.


BENJAMIN NETANYAHUS SPEECHES AT CONGRESS AND AIPAC MAR 3 AND MAR 2,2015

Transcript of PM Binyamin Netanyahu’s Historic Speech to Congress-Israel's PM Netanyahu was interrupted 40 times with standing ovations in his 40 minute historic speech to the US Congress on Tuesday. Transcript By: Jewish Press Staff-Published: March 3rd, 2015

Americans have a more favorable view of Netanyahu than they do of Obama.

HERES THE SCRIPTURE NETANYAHU QUOTED FROM AT THE END OF HIS SPEECH-DEU 31:6 BUT I ADDED 7-9 ARE GREAT SCRIPTURES ALSO.
DEUTERONOMY 31:6-9
6  Be strong and of a good courage, fear not, nor be afraid of them: for the LORD thy God, he it is that doth go with thee; he will not fail thee, nor forsake thee.
7  And Moses called unto Joshua, and said unto him in the sight of all Israel, Be strong and of a good courage: for thou must go with this people unto the land which the LORD hath sworn unto their fathers to give them; and thou shalt cause them to inherit it.
8  And the LORD, he it is that doth go before thee; he will be with thee, he will not fail thee, neither forsake thee: fear not, neither be dismayed.
9  And Moses wrote this law, and delivered it unto the priests the sons of Levi, which bare the ark of the covenant of the LORD, and unto all the elders of Israel.

Speaker of the House John Boehner, President Pro Tem Senator Orrin Hatch, Senator Minority — Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, and House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.I also want to acknowledge Senator, Democratic Leader Harry Reid. Harry, it’s good to see you back on your feet.I guess it’s true what they say; you can’t keep a good man down.My friends, I’m deeply humbled by the opportunity to speak for a third time before the most important legislative body in the world, the U.S. Congress.I want to thank you all for being here today. I know that my speech has been the subject of much controversy. I deeply regret that some perceive my being here as political. That was never my intention.I want to thank you, Democrats and Republicans, for your common support for Israel, year after year, decade after decade.I know that no matter on which side of the aisle you sit, you stand with Israel.The remarkable alliance between Israel and the United States has always been above politics. It must always remain above politics.Because America and Israel, we share a common destiny, the destiny of promised lands that cherish freedom and offer hope. Israel is grateful for the support of American — of America’s people and of America’s presidents, from Harry Truman to Barack Obama.We appreciate all that President Obama has done for Israel.Now, some of that is widely known.Some of that is widely known, like strengthening security cooperation and intelligence sharing, opposing anti-Israel resolutions at the U.N.Some of what the president has done for Israel is less well- known.I called him in 2010 when we had the Carmel forest fire, and he immediately agreed to respond to my request for urgent aid.In 2011, we had our embassy in Cairo under siege, and again, he provided vital assistance at the crucial moment.Or his support for more missile interceptors during our operation last summer when we took on Hamas terrorists.In each of those moments, I called the president, and he was there.And some of what the president has done for Israel might never be known, because it touches on some of the most sensitive and strategic issues that arise between an American president and an Israeli prime minister.But I know it, and I will always be grateful to President Obama for that support.And Israel is grateful to you, the American Congress, for your support, for supporting us in so many ways, especially in generous military assistance and missile defense, including Iron Dome.Last summer, millions of Israelis were protected from thousands of Hamas rockets because this capital dome helped build our Iron Dome.Thank you, America. Thank you for everything you’ve done for Israel.My friends, I’ve come here today because, as prime minister of Israel, I feel a profound obligation to speak to you about an issue that could well threaten the survival of my country and the future of my people: Iran’s quest for nuclear weapons.We’re an ancient people. In our nearly 4,000 years of history, many have tried repeatedly to destroy the Jewish people. Tomorrow night, on the Jewish holiday of Purim, we’ll read the Book of Esther. We’ll read of a powerful Persian viceroy named Haman, who plotted to destroy the Jewish people some 2,500 years ago. But a courageous Jewish woman, Queen Esther, exposed the plot and gave for the Jewish people the right to defend themselves against their enemies.

The plot was foiled. Our people were saved.Today the Jewish people face another attempt by yet another Persian potentate to destroy us. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei spews the oldest hatred, the oldest hatred of anti-Semitism with the newest technology. He tweets that Israel must be annihilated — he tweets. You know, in Iran, there isn’t exactly free Internet. But he tweets in English that Israel must be destroyed.For those who believe that Iran threatens the Jewish state, but not the Jewish people, listen to Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, Iran’s chief terrorist proxy. He said: If all the Jews gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of chasing them down around the world.But Iran’s regime is not merely a Jewish problem, any more than the Nazi regime was merely a Jewish problem. The 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis were but a fraction of the 60 million people killed in World War II. So, too, Iran’s regime poses a grave threat, not only to Israel, but also the peace of the entire world. To understand just how dangerous Iran would be with nuclear weapons, we must fully understand the nature of the regime.The people of Iran are very talented people. They’re heirs to one of the world’s great civilizations. But in 1979, they were hijacked by religious zealots — religious zealots who imposed on them immediately a dark and brutal dictatorship.That year, the zealots drafted a constitution, a new one for Iran. It directed the revolutionary guards not only to protect Iran’s borders, but also to fulfill the ideological mission of jihad. The regime’s founder, Ayatollah Khomeini, exhorted his followers to “export the revolution throughout the world.”I’m standing here in Washington, D.C. and the difference is so stark. America’s founding document promises life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Iran’s founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad. And as states are collapsing across the Middle East, Iran is charging into the void to do just that.Iran’s goons in Gaza, its lackeys in Lebanon, its revolutionary guards on the Golan Heights are clutching Israel with three tentacles of terror. Backed by Iran, Assad is slaughtering Syrians. Back by Iran, Shiite militias are rampaging through Iraq. Back by Iran, Houthis are seizing control of Yemen, threatening the strategic straits at the mouth of the Red Sea. Along with the Straits of Hormuz, that would give Iran a second choke-point on the world’s oil supply.Just last week, near Hormuz, Iran carried out a military exercise blowing up a mock U.S. aircraft carrier. That’s just last week, while they’re having nuclear talks with the United States. But unfortunately, for the last 36 years, Iran’s attacks against the United States have been anything but mock. And the targets have been all too real.Iran took dozens of Americans hostage in Tehran, murdered hundreds of American soldiers, Marines, in Beirut, and was responsible for killing and maiming thousands of American service men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan.Beyond the Middle East, Iran attacks America and its allies through its global terror network. It blew up the Jewish community center and the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires. It helped Al Qaida bomb U.S. embassies in Africa. It even attempted to assassinate the Saudi ambassador, right here in Washington, D.C.In the Middle East, Iran now dominates four Arab capitals, Baghdad, Damascus, Beirut and Sanaa. And if Iran’s aggression is left unchecked, more will surely follow.So, at a time when many hope that Iran will join the community of nations, Iran is busy gobbling up the nations.We must all stand together to stop Iran’s march of conquest, subjugation and terror.Now, two years ago, we were told to give President Rouhani and Foreign Minister Zarif a chance to bring change and moderation to Iran. Some change! Some moderation! Rouhani’s government hangs gays, persecutes Christians, jails journalists and executes even more prisoners than before.Last year, the same Zarif who charms Western diplomats laid a wreath at the grave of Imad Mughniyeh. Imad Mughniyeh is the terrorist mastermind who spilled more American blood than any other terrorist besides Osama bin Laden. I’d like to see someone ask him a question about that.Iran’s regime is as radical as ever, its cries of “Death to America,” that same America that it calls the “Great Satan,” as loud as ever.Now, this shouldn’t be surprising, because the ideology of Iran’s revolutionary regime is deeply rooted in militant Islam, and that’s why this regime will always be an enemy of America.Don’t be fooled. The battle between Iran and ISIS doesn’t turn Iran into a friend of America.Iran and ISIS are competing for the crown of militant Islam. One calls itself the Islamic Republic. The other calls itself the Islamic State. Both want to impose a militant Islamic empire first on the region and then on the entire world. They just disagree among themselves who will be the ruler of that empire.In this deadly game of thrones, there’s no place for America or for Israel, no peace for Christians, Jews or Muslims who don’t share the Islamist medieval creed, no rights for women, no freedom for anyone.

So when it comes to Iran and ISIS, the enemy of your enemy is your enemy.The difference is that ISIS is armed with butcher knives, captured weapons and YouTube, whereas Iran could soon be armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles and nuclear bombs. We must always remember — I’ll say it one more time — the greatest dangers facing our world is the marriage of militant Islam with nuclear weapons. To defeat ISIS and let Iran get nuclear weapons would be to win the battle, but lose the war. We can’t let that happen.But that, my friends, is exactly what could happen, if the deal now being negotiated is accepted by Iran. That deal will not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. It would all but guarantee that Iran gets those weapons, lots of them.Let me explain why. While the final deal has not yet been signed, certain elements of any potential deal are now a matter of public record. You don’t need intelligence agencies and secret information to know this. You can Google it.Absent a dramatic change, we know for sure that any deal with Iran will include two major concessions to Iran.The first major concession would leave Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure, providing it with a short break-out time to the bomb. Break-out time is the time it takes to amass enough weapons-grade uranium or plutonium for a nuclear bomb.According to the deal, not a single nuclear facility would be demolished. Thousands of centrifuges used to enrich uranium would be left spinning. Thousands more would be temporarily disconnected, but not destroyed.Because Iran’s nuclear program would be left largely intact, Iran’s break-out time would be very short — about a year by U.S. assessment, even shorter by Israel’s.And if — if Iran’s work on advanced centrifuges, faster and faster centrifuges, is not stopped, that break-out time could still be shorter, a lot shorter.True, certain restrictions would be imposed on Iran’s nuclear program and Iran’s adherence to those restrictions would be supervised by international inspectors. But here’s the problem. You see, inspectors document violations; they don’t stop them.Inspectors knew when North Korea broke to the bomb, but that didn’t stop anything. North Korea turned off the cameras, kicked out the inspectors. Within a few years, it got the bomb.Now, we’re warned that within five years North Korea could have an arsenal of 100 nuclear bombs.Like North Korea, Iran, too, has defied international inspectors. It’s done that on at least three separate occasions — 2005, 2006, 2010. Like North Korea, Iran broke the locks, shut off the cameras.Now, I know this is not gonna come a shock — as a shock to any of you, but Iran not only defies inspectors, it also plays a pretty good game of hide-and-cheat with them.The U.N.’s nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, said again yesterday that Iran still refuses to come clean about its military nuclear program. Iran was also caught — caught twice, not once, twice — operating secret nuclear facilities in Natanz and Qom, facilities that inspectors didn’t even know existed.Right now, Iran could be hiding nuclear facilities that we don’t know about, the U.S. and Israel. As the former head of inspections for the IAEA said in 2013, he said, “If there’s no undeclared installation today in Iran, it will be the first time in 20 years that it doesn’t have one.” Iran has proven time and again that it cannot be trusted. And that’s why the first major concession is a source of great concern. It leaves Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure and relies on inspectors to prevent a breakout. That concession creates a real danger that Iran could get to the bomb by violating the deal.But the second major concession creates an even greater danger that Iran could get to the bomb by keeping the deal. Because virtually all the restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program will automatically expire in about a decade.Now, a decade may seem like a long time in political life, but it’s the blink of an eye in the life of a nation. It’s a blink of an eye in the life of our children. We all have a responsibility to consider what will happen when Iran’s nuclear capabilities are virtually unrestricted and all the sanctions will have been lifted. Iran would then be free to build a huge nuclear capacity that could product many, many nuclear bombs.Iran’s Supreme Leader says that openly. He says, Iran plans to have 190,000 centrifuges, not 6,000 or even the 19,000 that Iran has today, but 10 times that amount — 190,000 centrifuges enriching uranium. With this massive capacity, Iran could make the fuel for an entire nuclear arsenal and this in a matter of weeks, once it makes that decision.My long-time friend, John Kerry, Secretary of State, confirmed last week that Iran could legitimately possess that massive centrifuge capacity when the deal expires.Now I want you to think about that. The foremost sponsor of global terrorism could be weeks away from having enough enriched uranium for an entire arsenal of nuclear weapons and this with full international legitimacy.And by the way, if Iran’s Intercontinental Ballistic Missile program is not part of the deal, and so far, Iran refuses to even put it on the negotiating table. Well, Iran could have the means to deliver that nuclear arsenal to the far-reach corners of the earth, including to every part of the United States. So you see, my friends, this deal has two major concessions: one, leaving Iran with a vast nuclear program and two, lifting the restrictions on that program in about a decade. That’s why this deal is so bad. It doesn’t block Iran’s path to the bomb; it paves Iran’s path to the bomb.So why would anyone make this deal? Because they hope that Iran will change for the better in the coming years, or they believe that the alternative to this deal is worse? Well, I disagree. I don’t believe that Iran’s radical regime will change for the better after this deal. This regime has been in power for 36 years, and its voracious appetite for aggression grows with each passing year. This deal would wet appetite — would only wet Iran’s appetite for more.

Would Iran be less aggressive when sanctions are removed and its economy is stronger? If Iran is gobbling up four countries right now while it’s under sanctions, how many more countries will Iran devour when sanctions are lifted? Would Iran fund less terrorism when it has mountains of cash with which to fund more terrorism? Why should Iran’s radical regime change for the better when it can enjoy the best of both world’s: aggression abroad, prosperity at home? This is a question that everyone asks in our region. Israel’s neighbors — Iran’s neighbors know that Iran will become even more aggressive and sponsor even more terrorism when its economy is unshackled and it’s been given a clear path to the bomb.And many of these neighbors say they’ll respond by racing to get nuclear weapons of their own. So this deal won’t change Iran for the better; it will only change the Middle East for the worse. A deal that’s supposed to prevent nuclear proliferation would instead spark a nuclear arms race in the most dangerous part of the planet.This deal won’t be a farewell to arms. It would be a farewell to arms control. And the Middle East would soon be crisscrossed by nuclear tripwires. A region where small skirmishes can trigger big wars would turn into a nuclear tinderbox.If anyone thinks — if anyone thinks this deal kicks the can down the road, think again. When we get down that road, we’ll face a much more dangerous Iran, a Middle East littered with nuclear bombs and a countdown to a potential nuclear nightmare.Ladies and gentlemen, I’ve come here today to tell you we don’t have to bet the security of the world on the hope that Iran will change for the better. We don’t have to gamble with our future and with our children’s future.We can insist that restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program not be lifted for as long as Iran continues its aggression in the region and in the world.Before lifting those restrictions, the world should demand that Iran do three things. First, stop its aggression against its neighbors in the Middle East. Second…Second, stop supporting terrorism around the world.And third, stop threatening to annihilate my country, Israel, the one and only Jewish state.Thank you.If the world powers are not prepared to insist that Iran change its behavior before a deal is signed, at the very least they should insist that Iran change its behavior before a deal expires.If Iran changes its behavior, the restrictions would be lifted. If Iran doesn’t change its behavior, the restrictions should not be lifted.If Iran wants to be treated like a normal country, let it act like a normal country.My friends, what about the argument that there’s no alternative to this deal, that Iran’s nuclear know-how cannot be erased, that its nuclear program is so advanced that the best we can do is delay the inevitable, which is essentially what the proposed deal seeks to do? Well, nuclear know-how without nuclear infrastructure doesn’t get you very much. A racecar driver without a car can’t drive. A pilot without a plan can’t fly. Without thousands of centrifuges, tons of enriched uranium or heavy water facilities, Iran can’t make nuclear weapons.Iran’s nuclear program can be rolled back well-beyond the current proposal by insisting on a better deal and keeping up the pressure on a very vulnerable regime, especially given the recent collapse in the price of oil.Now, if Iran threatens to walk away from the table — and this often happens in a Persian bazaar — call their bluff. They’ll be back, because they need the deal a lot more than you do.And by maintaining the pressure on Iran and on those who do business with Iran, you have the power to make them need it even more.My friends, for over a year, we’ve been told that no deal is better than a bad deal. Well, this is a bad deal. It’s a very bad deal. We’re better off without it.Now we’re being told that the only alternative to this bad deal is war. That’s just not true.The alternative to this bad deal is a much better deal.A better deal that doesn’t leave Iran with a vast nuclear infrastructure and such a short break-out time. A better deal that keeps the restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in place until Iran’s aggression ends.A better deal that won’t give Iran an easy path to the bomb. A better deal that Israel and its neighbors may not like, but with which we could live, literally. And no country…… no country has a greater stake — no country has a greater stake than Israel in a good deal that peacefully removes this threat.Ladies and gentlemen, history has placed us at a fateful crossroads. We must now choose between two paths. One path leads to a bad deal that will at best curtail Iran’s nuclear ambitions for a while, but it will inexorably lead to a nuclear-armed Iran whose unbridled aggression will inevitably lead to war.The second path, however difficult, could lead to a much better deal, that would prevent a nuclear-armed Iran, a nuclearized Middle East and the horrific consequences of both to all of humanity.

You don’t have to read Robert Frost to know. You have to live life to know that the difficult path is usually the one less traveled, but it will make all the difference for the future of my country, the security of the Middle East and the peace of the world, the peace, we all desire.My friend, standing up to Iran is not easy. Standing up to dark and murderous regimes never is. With us today is Holocaust survivor and Nobel Prize winner Elie Wiesel.Elie, your life and work inspires to give meaning to the words, “never again.”And I wish I could promise you, Elie, that the lessons of history have been learned. I can only urge the leaders of the world not to repeat the mistakes of the past.Not to sacrifice the future for the present; not to ignore aggression in the hopes of gaining an illusory peace.But I can guarantee you this, the days when the Jewish people remained passive in the face of genocidal enemies, those days are over.We are no longer scattered among the nations, powerless to defend ourselves. We restored our sovereignty in our ancient home. And the soldiers who defend our home have boundless courage. For the first time in 100 generations, we, the Jewish people, can defend ourselves.This is why — this is why, as a prime minister of Israel, I can promise you one more thing: Even if Israel has to stand alone, Israel will stand.But I know that Israel does not stand alone. I know that America stands with Israel.I know that you stand with Israel.You stand with Israel, because you know that the story of Israel is not only the story of the Jewish people but of the human spirit that refuses again and again to succumb to history’s horrors.Facing me right up there in the gallery, overlooking all of us in this (inaudible) chamber is the image of Moses. Moses led our people from slavery to the gates of the Promised Land.And before the people of Israel entered the land of Israel, Moses gave us a message that has steeled our resolve for thousands of years. I leave you with his message today, (SPEAKING IN HEBREW), “Be strong and resolute, neither fear nor dread them.”My friends, may Israel and America always stand together, strong and resolute. May we neither fear nor dread the challenges ahead. May we face the future with confidence, strength and hope.May God bless the state of Israel and may God bless the United States of America.
http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/transcript-of-pm-binyamin-netanyahus-historic-speech-to-congress/2015/03/03/

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at the AIPAC Policy Conference Delivered on March 2, 2015-jewishpress
“Thank you. Wow, 16,000 people. Anyone here from California? Florida? New York? Well, these are the easy ones. How about Colorado? Indiana? I think I got it. Montana?Texas? You’re here in record numbers. You’re here from coast to coast,from every part of this great land. And you’re here at a critical time. You’re here to tell the world that reports of the demise of the Israeli-U.S. relations are not only premature, they’re just wrong.You’re here to tell the world that our alliance is stronger than ever.And because of you, and millions like you, across this great country, it’s going to get even stronger in the coming years.Thank you Bob Cohen, Michael Kassen, Howard Kohr and all the leadership of AIPAC. Thank youfor your tireless, dedicated work to strengthen the partnership between Israel and the United States.I want to thank,most especially, Members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans. I deeply appreciate your steadfast support for Israel, year in, year out. You have our boundless gratitude.I want to welcome President Zeman of the Czech Republic.Mr. President, Israel never forgets its friends. And the Czech people have always been steadfast friends of Israel, the Jewish people, from the days of Thomas Masaryk at the inception of Zionism.You know, Mr. President, when I entered the Israeli army in 1967, I received a Czech rifle.That was one of the rifles that was given to us by your people in our time of need in 1948. So thank you for being here today.Also here are two great friends of Israel, former Prime Minister of Spain Jose Maria Aznar and as of last month, former Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird.Thank you both for your unwavering support. You are true champions of Israel, and you are, too, champions of the truth.I also want to recognize the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Dan Shapiro, for your genuine friendship, Dan,and for the great job you’re doing representing the United States and the State of Israel.And I want to recognize the two Rons. I want to thank Ambassador Ron Prosor for the exemplary job he’s doing at the U.N. in a very difficult forum.And I want to recognize the other Ron, a man who knows how to take the heat, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, Ron Dermer.Ron, I couldn’t be prouder to have you representing Israel in Washington.And finally, I want to recognize my wife, Sara, whose courage in the face of adversity is an inspiration to me.Sara divides her time as a child psychologist, as a loving mother, and her public duties as the wife of the prime minister.Sara, I’m so proud to have you here with me today, to have you with me at my side always.My friends, I bring greetings to you from Jerusalem, our eternal undivided capital.And I also bring to you news that you may not have heard. You see, I’ll be speaking in Congress tomorrow.You know, never has so much been written about a speech that hasn’t been given. And I’m not going to speak today about the content of that speech, but I do want to say a few words about the purpose of that speech.First, let me clarify what is not the purpose of that speech. My speech is not intended to show any disrespect to President Obama or the esteemed office that he holds. I have great respect for both.I deeply appreciate all that President Obama has done for Israel,security cooperation, intelligence sharing, support at the U.N., and much more, some things that I, as prime minister of Israel, cannot even divulge to you because it remains in the realm of the confidences that are kept between an American president and an Israeli prime minister.I am deeply grateful for this support, and so should you be.My speech is also not intended to inject Israel into the American partisan debate. An important reason why our alliance has grown stronger decade after decade is that it has been championed by both parties and so it must remain.Both Democratic and Republican presidents have worked together with friends from both sides of the aisle in Congress to strengthen Israel and our alliance between our two countries, and working together, they have provided Israel with generous military assistance and missile defense spending. We’ve seen how important that is just last summer.

Working together, they’ve made Israel the first free trade partner of America 30 years ago and its first official strategic partner last year.They’ve backed Israel in defending itself at war and in our efforts to achieve a durable peace with our neighbors. Working together has made Israel stronger; working together has made our alliance stronger.And that’s why the last thing that anyone who cares about Israel,the last thing that I would want is for Israel to become a partisan issue. And I regret that some people have misperceived my visit here this week as doing that. Israel has always been a bipartisan issue.Israel should always remain a bipartisan issue.Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of my address to Congress tomorrow is to speak up about a potential deal with Iran that could threaten the survival of Israel. Iran is the foremost state sponsor of terrorism in the world. Look at that graph. Look at that map. And you see on the wall, it shows Iran training, arming,dispatching terrorists on five continents. Iran envelopes the entire world with its tentacles of terror. This is what Iran is doing now without nuclear weapons. Imagine what Iran would do with nuclear weapons. And this same Iran vows to annihilate Israel. If it develops nuclear weapons, it would have the means to achieve that goal. We must not let that happen.And as prime minister of Israel, I have a moral obligation to speak up in the face of these dangers while there’s still time to avert them. For 2000 years, my people, the Jewish people, were stateless, defenseless, voiceless. We were utterly powerless against our enemies who swore to destroy us. We suffered relentless persecution and horrific attacks. We could never speak on our own behalf, and we could not defend ourselves.Well, no more, no more.The days when the Jewish people are passive in the face of threats to annihilate us, those days are over.Today in our sovereign state of Israel, we defend ourselves. And being able to defend ourselves, we ally with others, most importantly, the United States of America, to defend our common civilization against common threats.In our part of the world and increasingly, in every part of the world, no one makes alliances with the weak. You seek out those who have strength, those who have resolve, those who have the determination to fight for themselves. That’s how alliances are formed.So we defend ourselves and in so doing, create the basis of a broader alliance.And today, we are no longer silent; today, we have a voice.And tomorrow, as prime minister of the one and only Jewish state, I plan to use that voice.I plan to speak about an Iranian regime that is threatening to destroy Israel, that’s devouring country after country in the Middle East, that’s exporting terror throughout the world and that is developing, as we speak, the capacity to make nuclear weapons, lots of them.Ladies and gentlemen, Israel and the United States agree that Iran should not have nuclear weapons, but we disagree on the best way to prevent Iran from developing those weapons.Now disagreements among allies are only natural from time to time, even among the closest of allies. Because they’re important differences between America and Israel.The United States of America is a large country,one of the largest. Israel is a small country, one of the smallest.America lives in one of the world’s safest neighborhoods. Israel lives in the world’s most dangerous neighborhood. America is the strongest power in the world. Israel is strong, but it’s much more vulnerable. American leaders worry about the security of their country. Israeli leaders worry about the survival of their country.You know I think that encapsulates the difference. I’ve been prime minister of Israel for nine years. There’s not a single day, not one daythat I didn’t think about the survival of my country and the actions that I take to ensure that survival, not one day.And because of these differences, America and Israel have had some serious disagreements over the course of our nearly 70-year-old friendship.Now, it started with the beginning. In 1948, Secretary of State Marshall opposed David Ben- Gurion’s intention to declare statehood.That’s an understatement. He vehemently opposed it. But Ben-Gurion,understanding what was at stake, went ahead and declared Israel’s independence.

In 1967, as an Arab noose was tightening around Israel’s neck,the United States warned Prime Minister Levi Eshkol that if Israel acted alone, it would be alone. But Israel did act — acted alone to defend itself.In 1981, under the leadership of Prime Minister Menachem Begin, Israel destroyed the nuclear reactor at Osirak. The United States criticized Israel and suspended arms transfers for three months. And in 2002, after the worst wave of Palestinian terror attacks in Israel’s history, Prime Minister Sharon launched Operation Defensive Shield. The United States demanded that Israel withdraw its troops immediately, but Sharon continued until the operation was completed.There’s a reason I mention all these. I mention them to make a point. Despite occasional disagreements, the friendship between America and Israel grew stronger and stronger, decade after decade.And our friendship will weather the current disagreement, as well, to grow even stronger in the future.And I’ll tell you why; because we share the same dreams. Because we pray and hope and aspire for that same better world; because the values that unite us are much stronger than the differences that divide usvalues like liberty, equality, justice, tolerance,compassion.As our region descends into medieval barbarism, Israel is the one that upholds these values common to us and to you.As Assad drops bell bombs on his own people, Israeli doctors treat his victims in our hospitals right across the fence in the Golan Heights.As Christians in the Middle East are beheaded and their ancient communities are decimated, Israel’s Christian community is growing and thriving, the only one such community in the Middle East.As women in the region are repressed, enslaved, and raped, women in Israel serve as chief justices, CEOs, fighter pilots, two women chief justices in a row. Well, not in a row, but in succession. That’s pretty good.In a dark, and savage, and desperate Middle East, Israel is a beacon of humanity, of light, and of hope.Ladies and gentlemen, Israel and the United States will continue to stand together because America and Israel are more than friends. We’re like a family. We’re practically mishpocha.Now, disagreements in the family are always uncomfortable, but we must always remember that we are family.Rooted in a common heritage, upholding common values, sharing a common destiny. And that’s the message I came to tell you today. Our alliance is sound. Our friendship is strong. And with your efforts it will get even stronger in the years to come.Thank you, AIPAC. Thank you, America. God bless you all.”
http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/transcript-of-netanyahus-aipac-speech/2015/03/02/0/