JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35
Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of
Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST
DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36 And upon Elam will I bring the four
winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS
IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there
shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD
IMMIGRATION)
37 For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be
dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life:
and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES
POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I
have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)
IAEA chief calls for ‘concrete progress’ in Iran talks
Tehran says it has a ‘new approach’ ahead of back-to-back meetings with UN inspectors and world powers in Vienna
Amano described his meeting as important in
addressing “the outstanding issues regarding Iran’s nuclear
program.”Iranian officials are scheduled to hold
multiple meetings to try and resolve international concerns that the
Islamic Republic is developing nuclear weapons.On Wednesday, Iran will
hold low-level
technical talks with representatives from the six world powers engaged
in parallel talks over curbing Tehran’s nuclear program.Several rounds
of talks between Tehran and the
IAEA over opening up suspected nuclear sites to international oversight
have failed to produce any headway, but Araqchi said Iran would bring
new tactics to the table.The talks “will focus on Iran’s new approach
to negotiations with this international body,” Araqchi said according to
a Sunday report from Iranian Press TV.The two men also planned to talk
about recent
developments in meetings between Tehran and the P5+1 world powers, the
US, Britain, France, Russia, China, plus Germany.Shortly after the
Araqchi-Amano meeting,
technical and legal experts from Iran and the IAEA were scheduled to
begin two days of talks about Iran’s nuclear program. IAEA experts are
looking to investigate suspicions that Iran for years worked secretly on
developing a nuclear weapons program.
Representatives
of the two sides have already met 11 times since January as the IAEA
tries to negotiate access to some of Iran’s nuclear facilities in order
to monitor activity within the sites.The sides are scheduled to
hold diplomatic-level meetings in Vienna on November 7 and 8.The flurry
of activity comes amid intensified
efforts by the West to curb enrichment in Iran. A meeting in mid-October
between Iran and the US, UK, France, Russia, China and Germany, known
as the P5+1, produced cautious optimism that a deal could be reached to
limit Iranian nuclear enrichment in exchange for eased sanctions.The
optimism came after years of inconclusive meetings. The talks in Geneva
were focused on limiting Iranian nuclear programs that can be used both
to generate power and make fissile warhead material.The key elements of the talks are Iran’s
uranium enrichment program and its plutonium heavy-water facility.
Western nations argue that the 20 percent enriched uranium and the
plutonium Iran is producing are not necessary for generating nuclear
power and therefore must be halted with all such material removed from
the country.In an effort to pressure Tehran to agree to
the demands, a series of suffocating sanctions has been enforced on
Iran’s oil and financial sectors over the past couple of years. Tehran
hopes to negotiate an easing of the sanctions without giving up its
enrichment program.
Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi (photo credit: Screen capture YouTube/Press TV)
On Sunday, Iranian Parliament Speaker Ali
Larijani told China’s Phoenix news network that he believes a deal can
be reached within a year, but Tehran will not halt the program if talks
fail..“The settlement of nuclear issues completely
depends on the approaches and if a positive approach rules the
negotiations and there exist some seriousness, one can hope for the
settlement of issues in less than a year,” Larijani said according to a
report in the state-run Fars news agency. “If the negotiations fail to
yield results, we will continue the present path and approach that we
are paving now.”Israel has called for enrichment to cease
completely, saying even low-grade uranium could be made suitable for a
nuclear weapon in a short time with enough centrifuges running.A report last week by the US-based Institute
for Science and International Security, which has been tracking Iran’s
nuclear program, estimated that Tehran could have enough material for a
bomb in a number of weeks, should it choose to build one.Iran says it has no nuclear arms and denies
working toward one, claiming all its atomic activities are peaceful.
While the talks with the IAEA and the P5+1 are formally separate, they
are linked by concerns over Iran’s nuclear aspirations, and progress in
one may result in advances in the other.The diplomatic atmosphere between Iran and
Western powers improved following the August installation of President
Hassan Rouhani who is considered more moderate than his predecessor
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. During the United Nations General Assembly meetings
at the beginning of September Iranian officials, including Rouhani,
held ground-breaking meetings with Western leaders after years of
diplomatic severance.However, Israeli officials maintain that
regardless of its diplomatic overtures to the West, Iran is still
hell-bent on achieving nuclear weapons.The Associated Press contributed to this report.
PSALMS 83:3-7
3 They (ARABS,MUSLIMS) have taken crafty counsel against thy people,(ISRAEL) and consulted against thy hidden ones.
4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance.
5 For they (MUSLIMS) have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee:(TREATIES)
6 The tabernacles of Edom,(JORDAN) and the Ishmaelites;(ARABS) of Moab, PALESTINIANS,JORDAN) and the Hagarenes;(EGYPT)
7
Gebal,(HEZZBALLOH,LEBANON) and Ammon,(JORDAN) and
Amalek;(SYRIA,ARABS,SINAI) the Philistines (PALESTINIANS) with the
inhabitants of Tyre;(LEBANON)
ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15
Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell
are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through,
it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under
falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord
GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a
precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not
make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and
righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge
of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your
covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell
shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then
ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth
it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and
by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.
The Israel Prison Service
published the names late Sunday night of 26 Palestinian prisoners set to
be released over the next 48 hours as part of a deal to keep the
US-brokered Israeli-Palestinian peace talks on course. All are convicted
murderers.Six
of the inmates have been imprisoned for just under 30 years, one of
whom was due to be released in four years. All were imprisoned for
murders committed before the signing of the 1993 Oslo Peace Accords. A
government statement said earlier that 21 of the inmates were from the
West Bank and five were from the Gaza Strip.Among the prisoners to go free is Damouni Saad
Mohammed Ahmed, who was convicted in the 1990 lynch of IDF reservist
Amnon Pomerantz in the Gaza Strip; Pomerantz’s car was set on fire while
he was inside. The other convicted murderer of Pomerantz is not among
those set to be released.In a list of Pre-Oslo prisoners released by
the Almagor Terror Victims Association, it is noted that Ahmed “did not
express regret for his acts.”
Gila
Molcho, center, holds a picture of her brother Ian Feinberg, who was
killed in 1993 in Gaza, at a demonstration against the release of
Palestinian prisoners outside the Supreme Court in Jerusalem on August
11, 2013. (photo credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
The killer behind the 1993 murder of
South-African-born Ian Feinberg, a 30-year-old lawyer and activist
working with Palestinians in Gaza, will also be set free. Masoud Issa
Rajeb Amer, a member of the PFLP, was sentenced to three life sentences
for the killing, which was perpetrated with a hatchet. On April 18,
1993, Feinberg participated in a meeting in the Gaza offices of a
European-funded NGO involved in aid projects when terrorists burst in,
ordered everyone, except Feinberg, to the floor, and proceeded to kill
him.
Massalha Awwad Mohammed Yusuf and Amawi Hamed
Alabad Halmi, both Hamas members who killed 22-year-old Yigal Vaknin in
1993, are also on the list. Vaknin was lured with a plea for help and
stabbed to death. His body was found in a field near his home in Moshav
Bazra in the Sharon region, two hours before the start on Yom Kippur
that year. Yusuf was originally sentenced to two life terms for the
killing.Also included is Haga Salim Mahmud Mo’id who
in May 1992 swam from Aqaba, Jordan to Eilat along with three other
terrorists and shot 62-year-old Yosef Shirazi to death. Various weapons
were found on Mo’id which led authorities to believe they planned a much
larger attack.
Relatives
of Israelis killed in terror attacks holding signs as they demonstrate
outside the Supreme Court in Jerusalem on August 11, 2013. (Photo
credit: Yonatan Sindel/Flash90)
The
planned release
constitutes the second phase of a four-stage prisoner release deal,
agreed to as part of the talks which restarted in July. Israel released a
first group of prisoners in August.Earlier Sunday, a ministerial committee headed
by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved on the names of those
Palestinians set to go free on Tuesday.“A list of the prisoners is to be published
Sunday night on the website of the Israel Prisons Service, after the
bereaved families have been informed,” the statement said.
The releases were expected to be accompanied by the announcement of
new plans for West Bank settlement construction,
a senior Israeli official said.The religious, nationalist Jewish Home
party
has bitterly attacked the planned prisoner releases in recent days. On
Sunday, the party proposed legislation to prevent future releases.
Opposed by Netanyahu, the bill was rejected by the Ministerial Committee
for Legislation in an 8-5 vote.The Jewish Home’s decision to push
forward with the bill drew harsh criticism from Likud ministers and
other coalition partners.Justice Minister Tzipi Livni (Hatnua), who is
heading off negotiations with the Palestinians, criticized Jewish Home
and said that the committee vote showed which coalition parties truly
had the nation’s needs at heart.“Today it has once again been made clear
that
the government, in contrast to one of its member parties, is acting in
the national interest and not according to the instructions of the
rabbis in the West Bank,” she said.Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar
(Likud) denounced the Jewish Home ministers for failing to toe the
government line.“You are responsible just like all the other
members of the government,” he said to Pensioners Minister Uri Orbach
(Jewish Home). “If you don’t like it, you can resign.”Although the
prisoner release deal was
approved by Netanyahu, Jewish Home, led by Economics Minister Naftali
Bennett, blamed Livni for it.MK Ayelet Shaked of Jewish Home told
Channel 2
Saturday that Jewish Home had made its opposition clear to
Netanyahu. ”We told the prime minister that we are against the release
of terrorists. It’s immoral. No other country in the world does it,” she
said.Jewish Home also made plain it was not
appeased by news of further homes to be built in the settlements. In a
statement on Thursday, the party said that “the attempt to link the
release of the murderers to construction tenders is manipulative and
morally wrong. It will be better if the prime minister does not release
murderers and does not build. This looks like a despicable attempt to
free murderers and tarnish the settlement enterprise.”
Hatnua’s Environment Minister Amir Peretz said
earlier Sunday that Jewish Home could have prevented the release by
agreeing to a halt in settlement building, but is instead trying to
paper over its own involvement in the government move.“What is happening in front of our eyes is the
biggest dance of hypocrisy I’ve ever seen by a party,” Peretz, a former
defense minister, told Army Radio. “On the one hand it sits within the
government, and on the other hand it takes advantage of the convenience
of being in the government to fulfill its objectives; participates in
the vote on the prisoner release, and prevents any way of discussing
another option.”A senior Israeli official said the Americans
and Palestinians were aware of Israel’s intentions to build more
settlement homes, which had been made clear before talks resumed. The
official said that any new construction would take place inside the
major blocs Israel aims to keep in any future peace deal. In previous
rounds of negotiations, the Palestinians agreed in principle to swap
some West Bank land for Israeli territory to allow Israel to annex some
settled areas adjacent to the 1967 lines.Netanyahu has faced pressure from
hawkish ministers to
delay or cancel the prisoner releases in the wake of a series of
violent incidents in the West Bank in recent weeks, including
the killing of
two IDF soldiers and an attack that
wounded a 9-year-old girl in the settlement of Psagot.Deputy Defense Minister Danny Danon (Likud)
also slammed the planned prisoner release, saying it only strengthened
terror. ”We’ll see the celebrations in Gaza, in Ramallah, in Nablus.
This only strengthens those who seek to harm [us],” he told Army Radio
Saturday. ”Any approval of settlement construction should not be linked
to these releases,” he added.
Mahmoud Abbas celebrating the return of Palestinian prisoners in August. (photo credit: Issam Rimawi/Flash90)
Netanyahu has resisted the pressure from the
right and plans to release the prisoners on schedule, the prime
minister’s representative in the peace talks, attorney Yitzhak Molcho,
assured Palestinian and American officials in recent days.In July, Israel agreed to the four-phase
release of 104 prisoners, many of whom were convicted of brutal murders,
serving sentences for acts of terror committed before the signing of
the Oslo Accords in 1993. Twenty-six prisoners were released in the
first wave on August 13, just after talks started.
The deal was intended as a sign of good faith
ahead of the renewed American-brokered peace talks between Israel and
the Palestinians.
Op-Ed: PLEASE NOT AGAIN: Releasing Terrorists for "Peace"
Published: Monday, October 28, 2013 6:56 AM-Israelnationalnews
An internationally acclaimed Professor of Political
Science and International Law writes that this flawed plan is not only
indecent; it is also unlawful - and asks: What is wrong with us?
Prof. Louis René Beres
Credo quia absurdum. "I believe because it is absurd." Yet
again, a plainly desperate government in Jerusalem is preparing to
sacrifice Israel's self-respect and its
security in
a grotesque "gesture." Although the prime minister seeks to justify the
impending terrorist release as a sorely lamentable but still necessary
condition for "peace talks" with the Palestinian Authority, it is
perfectly obvious that no such talks could produce meaningful results.What,
exactly, is Benjamin Netanyahu thinking? On the Palestinian
Authority's maps, all of Israel is already included within "Palestine."Hillary
Clinton, John Kerry.....it makes not a bit of difference. In this
self-evident matter, the sitting American Secretary of State is beside
the point. Yet again, however unwittingly, Washington's "good offices"
will represent little more than an officially opened American back door
for the next massacre of Israeli women and children by terrorist
murderers.
Credo quia absurdum. For the past several
years, U.S. General Keith Dayton has been training Fatah "security
service forces" in nearby Jordan. Supported by tens of millions of U.S.
tax dollars, this uniquely incoherent program will only add to the
corollary harms of the Israeli prisoner release. Somehow, in an utterly
incomprehensible expression of "cooperation," Jerusalem and Washington
will have managed to implement a "peace plan" with no conceivable chance
of success.Significantly, this flawed plan is not only indecent; it is also unlawful.
All countries coexist under the indisputable authority of a planet-wide law of nations. A core
element of this longstanding international law is the rule of
Nullum crimen sine poena,
or "No crime without a punishment." This principle was reaffirmed at
the post-War Nuremberg Trials (1945-46). It remains a fully conspicuous
part of all national legal systems.President Barack Obama's
evident concurrence in the impending Israeli terrorist release
represents an incontestable act of U.S. complicity with major
international crimes. Here, the U.S. is in violation not only of
international law, but also
the law
of the United States. This is because international law is already
part of US law (the "supreme law of the land") by virtue of Article 6 of
the U.S. Constitution, and also by virtue of a number of landmark
Supreme Court decisions.Back in June 2003, the Shurat HaDin,
Israel Law Center, in an astute anticipation of then-planned terrorist
releases, had properly condemned Israel's intended freeing of 100
Palestinian prisoners. Later, almost five times that number were
actually set loose by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. Then, in her letter
to the Prime Minister, and to members of his Cabinet, Shurat HaDin
Director Nitsana Darshan-Leitner had written that releasing terrorists
as a "goodwill gesture" would only reignite Arab terrorism against
defenseless Jewish men, women, and especially children.Of course,
Director Darshan-Leitner was correct. Soon thereafter, at least two
newly-released Fatah-linked terrorists went on to launch suicide bomb
attacks in Israel. In one of these attacks, an alleged "military target"
of the heroic Palestinian fighters was a cafe filled with mothers and
their young children.
Every state has an obligation under
international law to prosecute and punish terrorists. This obligation
derives in part from the vital expectation, "No crime without a
punishment." It is codified directly in many basic sources, and is also
deducible from the binding Nuremberg Principles (1950). According to
Principle 1: "Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime
under international law is responsible therefore and liable to
punishment."
These
are Nuremberg-category crimes so egregious that the perpetrators are
known in law as Hostes humani generis, or "Common enemies of humankind."
Terrorism
is a serious crime under international law. The precise offenses that
comprise this crime can be found, inter alia, at The European Convention
on the Suppression of Terrorism. Notwithstanding Israeli government
assurances to the contrary at the time, some of the Palestinian
terrorists previously released in “good will gestures” were also guilty
of related crimes of war and crimes against humanity. These are
Nuremberg-category crimes so egregious that the perpetrators are known
in law as
Hostes humani generis, or "Common enemies of humankind."International
law presumes solidarity between all states in the fight against crime,
including the crime of terrorism. This presumption is mentioned as
early as the seventeenth century in Hugo Grotius, "The Law of War and
Peace" (1625). Although Israel has unequivocally clear jurisdiction to
punish crimes committed on its own territory, it may sometimes also have
the right to act under certain broader principles of "universal
jurisdiction."Its particular case for such wider jurisdiction,
which would derive from a reasonable expectation of interstate
solidarity, is found at the four Geneva Conventions of August 12, 1949.
These Conventions impose upon the High
Contracting Parties the sober obligation to punish "Grave Breaches.”No
government has the legal right to free terrorists as a "goodwill
gesture.” Terrorism is a criminally sanctionable violation of
international law, one that is not subject even to well-intentioned
manipulations by individual countries. Moreover, in the United States,
it is clear from the Constitution that the President's power to pardon
does not encompass violations of international law. Rather, this power
is always limited very narrowly to "Offenses against the United States."In
its original capture and punishment of Arab terrorists, Israel had
acted unambiguously on behalf of all states. Because some of these
terrorists had also committed crimes against other states, Israel cannot
now permissibly pardon these offenses against assorted other
sovereigns. Although Prime Minister Netanyahu's anticipated terrorist
release does not, strictly speaking, represent a "pardon," it would have
exactly the same legal consequence.No state possesses any sort
of authority to pardon violations of international law, especially the
uniquely cruel violations generated by Palestinian Arab terrorism. No
matter what might be permissible under its own Basic Law, any political
freeing of terrorists by Israel would always be impermissible. A
fundamental principle is established in law that, by virtue of any such
releases, the releasing state itself must assume responsibility for
pertinent past criminal acts, and for future ones.Under
international law, Prime Minister Netanyahu's intended release of more
Palestinian Arab terrorists, effectively analogous to a mass pardoning
of international criminals, would implicate the Jewish State for a
"denial of justice." This implication could have profound practical
consequences. Although it is arguable that punishment, which is always
central to justice, does not always deter future crimes, any such
Israeli freeing of terrorists would nonetheless undermine the Jewish
State's legal obligation to incapacitate violent criminals.What
sort of people and government would agree to free the murderers of its
own women and children, and without any plausible expectations of a
reciprocal peace or justice? Please, it should not be the people and government of Israel. Not again.
LOUIS RENÉ BERES was educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), and is Professor of Political Science and International Law at Purdue University. He is the author of many major books and articles dealing with international law and terrorism
EU DICTATOR (WORLD LEADER)
1 THESSALONIANS 5:3-7
2 For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction
cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not
escape.
4 But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.
5 Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.
6 Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.
7 For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they that be drunken are drunken in the night.
2 THESSALONIANS 2:3-4
3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come,
except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be
revealed,(EU WORLD DICTATOR)the son of perdition;
4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or
that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God,
shewing himself that he is God.
REVELATION 17:12-13
12 And the ten horns (NATIONS) which thou sawest are ten kings, which
have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour
with the beast.(SOCIALISM)
13 These have one mind,(SOCIALISM) and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.
REVELATION 6:1-2
1 And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it
were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see.
2 And I saw, and behold a white horse:(PEACE) and he that sat on him had
a bow;(EU DICTATOR) and a crown was given unto him:(PRESIDENT OF THE
EU) and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.(MILITARY GENIUS)
2 THESSALONIANS 2:9-12
9 Even him,(EU WORLD DICTATOR) whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish;
because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be
saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion,(THE FALSE
RESURRECTION BY THE WORLD DICTATOR) that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
REVELATION 13:1-10
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of
the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten
crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.(THE EU AND ITS
DICTATOR IS GODLESS)
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were
as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the
dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.(DICTATOR
COMES FROM NEW AGE OR OCCULT)
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death;(MURDERERD) and
his deadly wound was healed:(COMES BACK TO LIFE) and all the world
wondered after the beast.(THE WORLD THINKS ITS GOD IN THE FLESH, MESSIAH
TO ISRAEL)
4 And they worshipped the dragon (SATAN) which gave power unto the
beast:(JEWISH EU DICTATOR) and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is
like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?(FALSE
RESURRECTION,SATAN BRINGS HIM TO LIFE)
5 And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and
blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two
months.(GIVEN WORLD CONTROL FOR 3 1/2YRS)
6 And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God,(HES A GOD HATER) to
blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in
heaven.(HES A LIBERAL OR DEMOCRAT,WILL PUT ANYTHING ABOUT GOD DOWN)
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints,(BEHEAD THEM)
and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and
tongues, and nations.(WORLD DOMINATION)
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are
not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of
the world.(WORLD DICTATOR)
9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.
10 He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that
killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the
patience and the faith of the saints.(SAVED CHRISTIANS AND JEWS DIE FOR
THEIR FAITH AT THIS TIME,NOW WE ARE SAVED BY GRACE BUT DURING THE 7
YEARS OF HELL ON EARTH, PEOPLE WILL BE PUT TO DEATH (BEHEADINGS) FOR
THEIR BELIEF IN GOD (JESUS) OR THE BIBLE.
DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not
for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come (ROMANS IN AD
70) shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMANS DESTROYED THE 2ND
TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of
the war desolations are determined.
27 And he( EU ROMAN, JEWISH DICTATOR) shall confirm the covenant with
many for one week:( 7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause
the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,( 3 1/2 YRS) and for the
overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the
consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only
question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or
consent.James Paul Warburg appearing before the Senate on 7th February
1950
Like a famous WWII Belgian General,Paul Henry Spock said in 1957:We need
no commission, we have already too many. What we need is a man who is
great enough to be able to keep all the people in subjection to himself
and to lift us out of the economic bog into which we threaten to sink.
Send us such a man. Be he a god or a devil, we will accept him.And
today, sadly, the world is indeed ready for such a man.
Merkel: EU vote not decisive on commission President
25.10.13 @ 17:35
By Honor Mahony-EUOBSERVER
"I don't see any automaticity between top candidates and the filling of posts," said Merkel on Friday (25 October) in Brussels."The treaty says that it should be taken into account. Otherwise the
commission president will be voted by the parliament based on a proposal
by the [EU leaders]," she noted.She added that this means there will be "many considerations" and
"many discussions" after the 22-25 May European Parliament vote on how
to divide the vacant posts.Merkel's comments indicate the old habits
of the past will continue.This sees EU leaders negotiate behind doors
to divide up the posts of
the commission president, foreign affairs chief and EU council
president.Weight is given the person's political affiliation,
nationality and
gender. Their talent or suitability for the job is often an optional
extra.With the entrance into force in 2009 of the EU's newest set of the
rules - the Lisbon Treaty - several had hoped that the EU elections
would become more political, with the rules stating that EU leaders
should propose a commission president "taking into account" the European
elections.Those in favour of the idea say that giving EU voters a real
outcome
for their vote will make the election more European - rather than the
national affair it is today - and buck the continuous downward trend in
voter turnout.This has led to European political parties promising to
field
candidates for the post. Merkel's own faction, the centre-right EPP, is
set to make a nomination in March next year.European Parliament
President Martin Schulz is set to stand for the
centre-left while the far-left is set to field Alexis Tsipras, head of
Greece's Syriza party, as its candidate.Jean-Claude Juncker, longterm
Luxembourg leader, has been mentioned as a possible candidate for the
centre-right.
Merkel said there are important posts to be distributed by EU leaders
and that should be "distinguished from" political parties putting
forward top candidates.The chancellor added that the parties' candidates
cannot necessarily
expect to become president and said "false promises" should not be
made.The continuation of the secretive nomination process stands in
stark
contrast to the large increase in powers given to the EU level as a
result of the economic crisis.New rules allow the European Commission to
see the budgets of euro states before national parliaments do.Thomas
Klau from the European Council of Foreign Relations calls this
the "height of political irresponsibility" which will lead to another
"unconvincing trio" in Brussels - a reference to the occupants of the
current top three posts."National leaders seem intent on doing
politically mad thing of
having on the one hand strengthened the power of the system to intrude
in national politics and on the other hand refusing to give the system
the political leadership it would need to exercise such power
responsibly," Klau told this website.
EZEKIEL 38:1-12
1 And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,
2 Son of man, set thy face against Gog,(RULER) the land of
Magog,(RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW)and Tubal,(TOBOLSK)
and prophesy against him,
3 And say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I am against thee, O
Gog,(LEADER OF RUSSIA) the chief prince of Meshech(MOSCOW) and
Tubal:TOBOLSK)
4 And I will turn thee back, and put hooks into thy jaws,(GOD FORCES THE
RUSSIA-MUSLIMS TO MARCH) and I will bring thee forth, and all thine
army, horses and horsemen, all of them clothed with all sorts of armour,
even a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling
swords:
5 Persia,(IRAN,IRAQ) Ethiopia, and Libya with them; all of them with shield and helmet:
6 Gomer,(GERMANY) and all his bands; the house of Togarmah (TURKEY) of
the north quarters, and all his bands:(SUDAN,AFRICA) and many people
with thee.
7 Be thou prepared, and prepare for thyself, thou, and all thy company
that are assembled unto thee, and be thou a guard unto them.
8 After many days thou shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt
come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered
out of many people, against the mountains of Israel, which have been
always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall
dwell safely all of them.
9 Thou shalt ascend and come like a storm, thou shalt be like a cloud to
cover the land, thou, and all thy bands, and many people with
thee.(RUSSIA-EGYPT AND MUSLIMS)
10 Thus saith the Lord GOD; It shall also come to pass, that at the same
time shall things come into thy mind, and thou shalt think an evil
thought:
11 And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled
villages;(ISRAEL) I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely,
all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates,
12 To take a spoil,(OIL IS IN SPOIL) and to take a prey; to turn thine
hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the
people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle
and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.
Russia eyes Egypt’s ports in bid to boost military presence’
Cold-shouldered by Washington, Cairo could be just the thing Putin needs to secure more influence in the region, report says
By Times of Israel staff
October 27, 2013, 3:23 am
Russia has been seeking to
upgrade its military ties with Egypt in an effort to augment its limited
access to the Mediterranean and bolster its navy’s presence in the
region, the London Times
reported Sunday.According
to the report, Moscow has been shopping for alternatives to the Tartus
port in Syria, where it maintains a limited naval facility, due to fears
that President Bashar Assad’s regime will eventually be toppled by
rebel forces.The Times of Israel could not independently confirm the report.Russian President Vladimir Putin
has stated
that Russia would seek to maintain a permanent naval presence in the
Mediterranean, but experts say the base in Tartus can’t provide
sufficient support for such a presence and is too small for large ships.
“Tartus is vulnerable and not good enough and
the Egyptian ports are perfect for the Russian navy,” the Times quoted
an unnamed Israeli defense source as saying.An Egyptian diplomatic delegation was in
Moscow over the weekend for meetings with Russian officials. According
to the Times, the purpose of the trip was to lay the groundwork for a
visit to Cairo by Putin.Egypt, whose relationship with the US has been
suffering in the wake of recent political turmoil in the country, has
been on the lookout for a new military patron, and Russia’s need for a
larger, more reliable port of call in the Middle East could present a
confluence of interests for Cairo and Moscow.On October 19,
Israel’s Channel 2 reported
that Egypt was looking to Russia to supply it with arms after the US
froze much of its military aid in protest over the ouster of Muslim
Brotherhood president Mohammed Morsi.
Dissatisfied
with Egypt’s progress toward reinstating a democratic government, the US
announced earlier this month that it was freezing a sizable portion of
the $1.5 billion it provides Egypt each year.US officials said the aid being withheld
included 10 Apache helicopters, at a cost of more than $500 million,
M1A1 tank kits and Harpoon anti-ship missiles. The US had already
suspended the delivery of four F-16 fighter jets and canceled biennial
US-Egyptian military exercises.
Israel has reportedly argued
“directly and bluntly” with the Obama administration against cutting
aid to Egypt, telling Washington it was making “a strategic error” in
reducing financial assistance to Cairo.A renewed alliance with Moscow – the Soviet
Union was Cairo’s chief backer for much of the second half of the
twentieth century – could also infuse Egypt’s ebbing economy with
much-needed tourism and investments.
Another ally of Egypt, the United Arab
Emirates, said Saturday that it had boosted its aid pledges to Egypt’s
military-backed government to a total of $4.9 billion.The deal, signed for $1.9 billion in new
loans, fuel supplies and other assistance, came during a visit to Abu
Dhabi by Egyptian interim Prime Minister Hazem El-Beblawi.The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Israel has come under increasing
pressure to attend a United Nations human rights review, scheduled for
this Tuesday, and has reportedly been warned that a failure to attend
would cause harmful diplomatic fallout.
The
review, a Universal Periodic Review carried out by the UN Human Rights
Council, is obligatory every few years for all UN members, but foreign
minister Avigdor Liberman severed Israel’s relationship with the HRC in
2012 after the agency announced a probe into Israeli settlement
activities in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle on
Friday sent a letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urging Israeli
to attend the review,
Haaretz reported on Sunday.
The letter acknowledged Israel’s difficulties with the HRC, but said
not attending would have “serious consequences.”If Israel does not
attend, the report noted,
it will be the first country to fail to attend its Universal Periodic
Review, and it is feared that such a refusal will set a precedent for
other countries to do the same.In recent weeks Israel has reportedly
been in
discussions with other UN member states over a way for Israel to resume
cooperation with the HRC, and therefore attend the periodic review.
Israel participated in the first round of reviews, which was concluded
by October 2011, but has so far failed to indicate whether it would
participate in the second round, which is currently
ongoing.Representatives from Jerusalem skipped a
meeting in January to determine the three-member jury picked to oversee
the review — Maldives, Sierra Leone and Venezuela — drawing calls by
Pakistan for punitive action. Representatives of other countries also
urged Israel to return to the fold and comply with the UNHRC’s review
processes, but refrained from calling for punitive action, according to
UN Watch, which attended the meeting.Israel has laid out two conditions,
according
to the Haaretz report: a limit to the implementation of Article 7, the
permanent agenda item on the UN Human Rights Council which uniquely
demands a discussion of Israel’s human rights issues at every meeting,
and a way for Israel to join the UN’s Western Europe and Others Group,
which would end Israel’s regional isolation at the UN (the country
currently does not belong to a regional group, which limits Israel’s
participation in UN activities).
Israel’s acceptance into the Western Europe
and Others Group would require a unanimous vote from the member states
comprising that group. In his letter to Netanyahu, the German foreign
minister said that Israel’s attendance at the review would create “the
best conditions for its being accepted into the Western European and
Others Group.”In January, Israel’s permanent representative
to the Geneva-based UNHRC, Ambassador Eviatar Manor, spoke to the
council’s president, Remigiusz Henczel, about postponing the review.Manor said then that “Israel respected all
human rights mechanisms, although it had a complex and difficult
relation with the Council and OHCHR [Office of the High Commissioner for
Human Rights],” according to the official minutes of the meeting.
Raphael Ahren contributed to this report