Monday, December 22, 2014


JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO OTHER. 1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23 And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)


And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.

Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.


3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

8  The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant,(7 YR TREATY) he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man.(THE WORLD LEADER-WAR MONGER CALLS HIMSELF GOD)


GENESIS 25:20-26
20  And Isaac was forty years old (A BIBLE GENERATION NUMBER=1967 + 40=2007+) when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.
21  And Isaac intreated the LORD for his wife, because she was barren: and the LORD was intreated of him, and Rebekah his wife conceived.
22  And the children (2 NATIONS IN HER-ISRAEL-ARABS) struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the LORD.
23  And the LORD said unto her, Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels;(ISRAEL AND THE ARABS) and the one people shall be stronger than the other people;(ISRAEL STRONGER THAN ARABS) and the elder shall serve the younger.(LITERALLY ISRAEL THE YOUNGER RULES (ISSAC)(JACOB-LATER NAME CHANGED TO ISRAEL) OVER THE OLDER ARABS (ISHMAEL)(ESAU)
24  And when her days to be delivered were fulfilled, behold, there were twins in her womb.
25  And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.(THE OLDER AN ARAB)

14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.


1 And there was given me a(MEASURING) reed like unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein.
2 But the court which is without the temple leave out,(TO THE WORLD NATIONS) and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles: and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two months.(JERUSALEM DIVIDED BUT THE 3RD TEMPLE ALLOWED TO BE REBUILT)

27 And he( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

Vote on PA's Anti-Israel Resolution Likely to be Postponed-Diplomatic sources say that the PA, understanding that there's little support for its resolution, will work to change the text.
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print More Sharing Services
By Ben Ariel-First Publish: 12/22/2014, 6:14 AM-israelnationalnews

The vote on the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) unilateral resolution at the United Nations is likely to be postponed, diplomatic sources told the Walla! Hebrew-language news website on Sunday.According to the sources, the PA wants to postpone the vote on the resolution because it realized that its current wording is unacceptable to countries such as France and Luxembourg, two countries that the PA had hoped would support the resolution.The resolution, submitted last Wednesday by Jordan on behalf of the PA, calls for Israel to “end the occupation” - that is, to withdraw from Judea and Samaria - by 2017.The draft resolution would set a 12-month deadline for wrapping up negotiations on a final settlement and the end of 2017 as the time frame for completing an Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria.The resolution calls for a "just, lasting and comprehensive peace solution that brings an end to the Israeli occupation" and "fulfills the vision" of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as the shared capital.PA leaders now understand, Walla! reported, that the resolution as it is currently worded would not have enough support in the Security Council and in any case the United States is likely to veto it if it passes.The two key countries, France and Luxembourg, have reservations about the resolution in its current format and feel it is too one-sided, the report said. The sides are now working on a softened version that would be more acceptable.A Western diplomat involved in the talks on the issue told Walla! that the Palestinians understand that there is a high chance that the United States will veto any resolution no matter its wording, but they want to increase the pressure on the United States by ensuring a solid majority among European countries for their resolution, thus isolating Washington.

Updated PA Resolution Demands Israeli Withdrawal by 2017-Updated PA resolution to the Security Council sets 12-month deadline for talks, calls for Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria by 2017.-By Ben Ariel-First Publish: 12/18/2014, 6:12 AM-israelnationalnews

The Palestinian Authority (PA) is giving Israel another year to withdraw from Judea and Samaria than originally reported, according to the updated text of the draft resolution the PA submitted to the United Nations (UN) on Wednesday.The text, seen by AFP, calls for Israel to “end the occupation” - that is, to withdraw from Judea and Samaria - by 2017, instead of 2016 in the original text that was published back in October.The draft resolution would set a 12-month deadline for wrapping up negotiations on a final settlement and the end of 2017 as the time frame for completing an Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria.The resolution calls for a "just, lasting and comprehensive peace solution that brings an end to the Israeli occupation" and "fulfills the vision" of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as the shared capital, according to excerpts quoted by AFP.The final settlement should be reached no later than 12 months after the adoption of the resolution, the text says.The measure also provides for a phased Israeli withdrawal from Judea and Samaria according to a timeframe "not to exceed the end of 2017", a provision that is likely to run into opposition from the United States.While the United States has yet to officially announce whether it will veto the resolution at the Security Council, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry met with PA chief negotiator Saeb Erekat in London on Tuesday, where he reportedly promised to veto the resolution.On Wednesday, Kerry said Washington would not have a problem with the PA’s resolution, but only if it avoids exacerbating tensions in the region."We don't have any problem with them filing some resolution, providing it's done in the spirit of working with people to see how we could proceed forward in a thoughtful way that solves the problem, doesn't make it worse," Kerry told reporters, according to AFP.He acknowledged, however, that he had yet to examine the updated text of the draft resolution.The PA’s envoy to the UN, Riyad Mansour, told reporters earlier Wednesday there could still be negotiations on the text.Mansour thanked Arabs and European nations for their help with the draft resolution, which was submitted to the Security Council by Jordan, and indicated he would not press for a quick vote on the text, to allow for more discussion.

EU Hypocrisy: Helping Palestinian Authority Violate Oslo Accords-NGO finds EU funding illegal Palestinian settlements in breach of Oslo Accords, even as new push for sanctions on Israel revealed.-By Ari Soffer-First Publish: 10/22/2014, 4:20 PM-israelnationalnews

An Israeli NGO is set to release a report it says shows tens of cases in which the European Union has actively worked to breach the Oslo Accords signed between Israel and the Palestinian Authority, by changing the facts on the ground in Area C to unilaterally harm Israel in final status talks with the Palestinians.The report is significant as it comes at the same time as the EU has made a renewed push to threaten Jerusalem with sanctions if Israel makes "unilateral moves" which European states deem to be harmful to their vision of a "two-state solution."Regavim, a legal rights group dedicated to ensuring responsible, legal and accountable use of Israel’s national land, has already sent an official letter outlining some of their findings to Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman Wednesday, along with a call to stand strong against growing diplomatic pressure on Israel to make concessions by the EU."Once upon a time, the EU would pressure Israel by funding hostile NGOs, now it has cut out the middle man and is actively engaging in settlement activity on behalf of the Palestinians," Ari Briggs, International Director of Regavim stated."In the coming weeks we will present evidence of over 90 structures that have been built by the EU in contradiction with the Oslo accords and all international agreements. We have highlighted this to our government and call upon the EU to stop this blatant violation of Israeli sovereignty immediately.”The objectives of the illegal Palestinian building funded by the EU is ironically the very same one the body has attributed to Israeli building in the region: creating facts on the ground, in this case to undermine Israel's position.

EU 'red lines' threaten Israel with sanctions

The proliferation of illegal EU-funded Arab settlements is particularly ironic, coming as the EU pushes to meet with Israel to establish five "red lines" on building in Judea and Samaria which, if crossed by Israel, could result in EU sanctions.A document outlining the message EU Ambassador Faaborg-Andersen will be relaying to Israeli officials was obtained by Haaretz.Among the red lines: Building in parts of the Givat Hamatos neighborhood in Jerusalem which are over the "Green Line"; construction in the Har Homa neighborhood of Jerusalem; construction in "E1", between Jerusalem and Maaleh Adumim; relocating illegal Bedouin settlers from parts of Judea including E1; and "harming the status quo" on the Temple Mount by allowing Jews to pray there.All of the above are meant to preserve the possibility of a "two-state solution" with a PA-run state in Judea and Samaria."The EU considers the preservation of the two state solution a priority," the document reads. "The only way to resolve the conflict is through an agreement that ends the occupation which began in 1967, that ends all claims and fulfills the aspirations of both parties. A one state reality would not be compatible with these aspirations.""…there is a legitimate expectation to have a constructive dialogue with the Israeli authorities on measures from their side which may impact on our assistance and its ultimate objectives of creating a sound enabling environment for economic and social development in the occupied Palestinian territories and contributing to create the conditions for a viable Palestinian state," it continues.While the precise criteria are still relatively vague, once source told Haaretz that some EU states are pushing for an aggressive stance."Some countries, first of which is France, believe Israel must be presented with specific sanctions to be leveled if Israel takes specific actions so that there won’t be any surprises and the price is clear," a senior diplomat told the paper.Speaking on condition of anonymity, an Israeli official dismissed the proposal as putting "the hearing before the sentence.""We have a feeling they’re expecting us to reject the offer for negotiations and give them an excuse to push the sanctions against us, or that we’ll agree in any case to negotiations in which we’ll discuss which sanctions will be leveled."

Op-Ed: Autonomy, not Sovereignty: Oslo Accords and Statehood-Israel must seize the opportunity to reevaluate the Oslo Agreements and the Road Map given that the Palestinian Arab side has violated its undertakings.Published: Sunday, December 21, 2014 6:11 AM- ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS-Dr. Moshe Dann

Although the “two-state solution” has become accepted as the basis of the peace process between Israel and Arab Palestinians, that wasn’t the original plan.There is nothing in the Oslo Agreements about a “Palestinian state.” PM Yitzhak Rabin in his speech in Knesset (Oct 5, 1995) made this clear when, seeking approval for the ”Interim Agreement”  he said that he envisioned an independent, autonomous “Palestinian entity, not a state.”  Neither he, nor Shimon Peres (at least initially), both of whom were intimately involved in writing the Oslo Agreements, saw the Agreements as the foundation for a sovereign Palestinian state.The idea of a “sovereign Palestinian state” was first presented in the Road Map (2003) to which PM Ariel Sharon agreed: “Israeli leadership issues unequivocal statement affirming its commitment to the two-state vision of an independent, viable, sovereign Palestinian state.”The subtle but all-important insertion of a single word changed the course of the Oslo Agreement and the “peace process.” The bandwagon was on a roll.A year later, Sharon announced his “Disengagement” plan from Gaza and Northern Shomron (Samaria), and in 2005 he implemented it, destroying 25 thriving Jewish communities. His successor, PM Ehud Olmert pledged to complete the process of withdrawal from Judea and Samaria.The Oslo Agreements may have set the course for Palestinian autonomy and eventually a form of statehood, but Sharon overturned the gradual process into a policy of unilateral withdrawal from Yesha.Although the Oslo Agreements suggest “Palestinian autonomy,” “an entity, not a state,” these concepts were deliberately kept vague until Sharon made them explicit and official.Sharon overturned the gradual process into a policy of unilateral withdrawal from Yesha.According to the Interim Agreement, however, the Government of Israel (GOI) agreed to redeploy in “the West Bank” in two stages; first, from Areas A and B, which comprise nearly all Arabs in Judea, Samaria and Gaza; and second, from portions of Area C, in which all Jewish communities (“settlements”) are located and, most importantly, is vital for Israel’s security.Article 11, #3/3 of the Agreement was specific: “Area C means areas of the West Bank outside of Areas A and B which will be … gradually transferred to Palestinian jurisdiction…” implying that the Palestinian Authority would extend its control over Area C, except for security areas (e.g. along the 1949 Armistice Lines and the Jordan Valley) and Jewish communities, which would be determined later as part of a final status agreement.  These communities and their infrastructure (roads, etc) comprise less than 10% of Area C.Israel alone would determine the timing and scope of its redeployment and would exercise powers and responsibilities which were not transferred, such as security and foreign affairs, not only in Area C, but in A and B as well. Palestinians were given autonomy, not sovereignty.Regardless of what Rabin and Peres had in mind, the Interim Agreement is still the only international agreement defining the PA’s and GOI’s commitments. Unfortunately, that agreement does not condition an Israeli withdrawal, or redeployment on Palestinians fulfilling their commitments – e.g. ending hostilities, incitement, and support for terrorism.The framers of Agreement hoped that by giving Palestinians autonomy while retaining exclusive control over redeployment and security, and retaining sovereignty, Israel could restrict Palestinian violence and eventually modify behavior. They believed that if the Palestinians would not take effective security control in Area A -- to prevent attacks against Israelis and Israel -- Israel would not give them more authority over additional areas in Area C.  

Significantly, neither the Declaration of Principles (Oslo 1), signed by Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, Mahmoud Abbas, and Sec of State Warren Christopher, nor the Interim Agreement, signed by Rabin, Arafat and President Clinton, mention the area as Judea and Samaria, its original and authentic name. By referring to the area only as “the West Bank,” the term used by Jordan during its occupation, the GOI signaled its abandonment of legal and historical claims to the area.Unwittingly, Rabin and Peres painted Israel into a corner. This flaw was exacerbated by subsequent agreements, like the ” Road Map,” which touted a “two-state” model, undercutting the Oslo Agreements and encouraging Arab and Palestinian leaders to reject any recognition of Israel’s right to exist, continue incitement and terrorism, and move unilaterally towards recognition of sovereign statehood.Although Abbas’ demand for statehood is an abrogation of the Oslo Agreements, thus releasing Israel from its contractual obligations, the GOI seems unwilling to take a more realistic view of its alternatives.A revaluation of Israeli policy is imperative. Israel’s ambiguity about the status of Judea and Samaria and the Oslo Agreements has led to confusion and has eroded its diplomatic position. There is no logical or legal reason why Israel is obligated to commitments in the Oslo Agreements and the Road Map while the Palestinian side violates its undertakings.This offers a golden opportunity to preserve the structure of the Oslo Agreements and benefit Israelis and Arab Palestinians.Several years ago, Prime Minister Netanyahu appointed a Commission headed by the late High Court Justice Edmund Levy and judicial and legal experts, to evaluate issues concerning Area C in Judea and Samaria. The Commission issued a report with specific recommendations that would enhance the Oslo Agreements and advance our national interests.  Inexplicably, the Prime Minister has refused to allow this report to be discussed by the government.I would like to thank Joel Singer, architect of the Oslo Agreements, for his assistance.

Herzog and Livni Pledge to Keep Jerusalem United-"Tzipi and I are committed to guarding our capital Jerusalem," says Labor leader at candle-lighting at the Kotel.By Hezki Ezra-First Publish: 12/22/2014, 3:42 AM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS

Labor chairman MK Yitzhak Herzog and former Justice Minister Tzipi Livni vowed on Sunday that they will not divide Jerusalem, rejecting criticism of them from the nationalist parties.The two attended a Hanukkah candle-lighting ceremony at the Western Wall, which was also attended by Rabbi David Lau, the Chief Ashkenazi Rabbi, and Rabbi Shmuel Rabinowitz, the Rabbi of the Kotel."Tzipi and I are committed to guarding our capital Jerusalem, to guarantee and its future and preserve this holy place," Herzog said."We came, Tzipi and I, to say on this Festival of Lights that we are committed to the most elementary principles which are essential to the future of the Jewish people," he added.Livni said during the ceremony that "the paratroopers who cried at the Western Wall in 1967 caused all of Israel to weep with happiness. These paratroopers were traditional, religious, and secular. Members of kibbutzim, residents of the center and the periphery. And everyone felt a sense of returning home. In this holy place, we commit ourselves that in any situation this place will remain ours, the people of Israel, it will remain under Israel's sovereignty.”Livni and Herzog recently signed a unity pact, forming a center-leftist bloc ahead of the upcoming elections.Under the pact, if the joint list wins the elections and forms a coalition, Herzog would become Prime Minister for the first two years, and Livni would serve the last two years.Livni in particular has come under fire from the Likud and the Jewish Home in recent days, the most recent criticism coming on Saturday after it was revealed that Livni asked U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to shoot down a unilateral Palestinian Authority (PA) UN bid so as to help the left in elections.Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon (Likud) on Sunday hit out at Livni over her actions, calling her move "invalid to its core, because you can't involve foreign sources in Israeli political matters.""It's clear to all of us that if Tzipi Livni and Buji Herzog were in power, there would have been Hamastan in Judea and Samaria for a long time already," said Ya'alon.

Syria Claims to Have Downed Israeli Drone-Arab media reports that Syria downed an Israeli drown near Quneitra. IDF: We don't respond to foreign reports.By Ben Ariel-First Publish: 12/21/2014, 11:46 PM / Last Update: 12/22/2014, 1:45 AM-ISRAELNATIONALNEWS

Arab media reported on Sunday night that Syria had downed an Israeli drone in the Golan Heights.
According to the report, which appeared on Hezbollah’s Al-Manar television and on official Syrian TV, an "unmanned aircraft of the Zionist regime was downed over the skies of Quneitra, close to the border."In response, the IDF said, according to Channel 2 News, that "the IDF does not respond to foreign reports.” Later on Sunday, the IDF Spokesperson said it was “unaware of any unmanned aircraft that was shot down in the Golan.”The report comes two weeks after Syria accused Israel of carrying out airstrikes against two government-held areas in Damascus province.After the alleged Israeli airstrikes, Arab media outlets reported that the airstrikes targeted Syrian military sites that were being used to store arms destined for Hezbollah. Shortly after the strikes, rumors circulated the sites - including Damascus International Airport and the Dimas airbase - were being used to store sophisticated weapons, including Russian-made S300 surface-to-air missiles.Israeli officials have remained tight-lipped, as in previous apparently Israeli strikes against "game-changing" arms destined for Hezbollah.But speaking to Kol Yisrael radio a day after the alleged airstrikes, Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz appeared to allude to the strikes, and reiterated that Israel would prevent sophisticated arms from reaching the hands of terrorists.Syria, for its part, demanded that the United Nations impose sanctions on Israel in response to what it termed “the Israeli aggression on the Syrian soil”.In a letter addressed to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the UN Security Council, the Syrian Foreign Ministry said that Israel “has committed a heinous crime against the sovereignty of Syria as Israeli warplanes attacked two safe areas in al-Dimas and near Damascus International Airport in Damascus Countryside, causing material damage in a number of institutions there.”The letter claimed, as Syria has done in the past, that “the attack is in the framework of extending help and support to the armed terrorist groups in Syria, especially after the series of achievements made by the Syrian army in Deir Ezzor, Aleppo, Daraa and other areas.”