JEWISH KING JESUS IS COMING AT THE RAPTURE FOR US IN THE CLOUDS-DON'T
MISS IT FOR THE WORLD.THE BIBLE TAKEN LITERALLY- WHEN THE PLAIN SENSE
MAKES GOOD SENSE-SEEK NO OTHER SENSE-LEST YOU END UP IN NONSENSE.GET
SAVED NOW- CALL ON JESUS TODAY.THE ONLY SAVIOR OF THE WHOLE EARTH - NO
OTHER.
1 COR 15:23-JESUS THE FIRST FRUITS-CHRISTIANS RAPTURED TO JESUS-FIRST
FRUITS OF THE SPIRIT-23 But every man in his own order: Christ the
firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ’s at his coming.ROMANS 8:23
And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of
the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the
adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.(THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE)
IRAN GUARENTEED NUKES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjj-9YgX-s0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0DaSeiPwPk
And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE
First poll since Netanyahu’s speech still shows Zionist Union leading-Herzog’s party on 24 seats, Likud on 23, but 47% want PM to continue for another term By Adiv Sterman and Ricky Ben-David March 4, 2015, 8:39 pm 15-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
Even after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Tuesday speech at the US Congress, rival Isaac Herzog’s Zionist Union party would still be the largest Knesset faction following the March 17 elections, according to a Channel 2 poll published Wednesday, the first since the Israeli leader returned from Washington.Based on the survey — conducted among 790 respondents with a 3.5% margin of error — the Zionist Union would receive 24 seats, while the Likud would gain 23.The Joint (Arab) List places third with 13 seats, Yesh Atid and Jewish Home follow with 12 each, and Kulanu with 8. Yisrael Beytenu and Meretz, as well as ultra-Orthodox parties Shas and United Torah Judaism, would all gain 6 seats, while Eli Yishai’s new Yachad party manages to just cross the electoral threshold with 4 Knesset seats.Conducted by the Midgam polling group, the survey further found that 44% of respondents believe Netanyahu’s Washington address strengthened his standings in Israel, 43% said there was no change in the Israeli leaders popularity and 12% said the prime minister had been weakened as a result of the speech.Thirty one percent of polled individuals said the main goal of Netanyahu’s address was to thwart a deal between the P5+1 world powers and Iran over the latter’s contested nuclear program, 29% said the prime minister traveled abroad mainly for campaigning purposes and 30% said they believed the Israeli leader intended to achieve both goals.Despite the slight lead for Zionist Union, 47% of those polled said they wanted to see Netanyahu serve again as prime minister, with Herzog gaining the support of only 28%. Twenty-one percent said they did not know whom they preferred.If the Likud were tasked with forming the coalition, according to Channel 2, its 23 seats could be joined with Jewish Home, 12, Yisrael Beytenu, 6, Kulanu, 8, Shas, 6, UTJ, 6 and Yachad, 4 for a total of 65 seats, giving Netanyahu a slim majority.Should the Zionist Union form a government, it could partner with Meretz’s 6 seats, Yesh Atid’s 12, Kulanu’s 8 and — two unlikely partners — Shas, 6 and Yisrael Beytenu, 6, for a total of 62 mandates, an even slimmer majority than the Likud-led constellation. Shas has said it would refuse to serve in a coalition with Lapid and Liberman has vowed never to sit in a government with Meretz.Since Netanyahu’s speech was announced in January, the prime minister’s critics have accused him of using the US Capitol stage to boost his polls ahead of Israel’s March 17 election. Supporters say his only intention is to defend his country from a looming threat.In Israel’s newspapers, responses to the speech fell along ideological lines. At the pro-Netanyahu daily Israel Hayom, Boaz Bismuth, under the headline “The speech of a historic moment,” wrote that Netanyahu succeeded in transcending politics, as “there are moments in which a leader does what he does not for votes, but for the children … There are moments in history that a leader makes happen.”Elsewhere, pundits were more skeptical of the prime minister’s goals. Nahum Barnea, a staunch Netanyahu critic at Yediot Aharonot, wrote that Netanyahu created “a golden opportunity to leave an impression on voters in Israel, and used it to the fullest.”Netanyahu has been emphasizing the Iranian nuclear threat throughout the campaign, despite polls showing that voters care more about economics this time around. Oded Eran, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, said in light of that, Netanyahu’s speech won’t influence the polls, as “there are problems of housing and cost of living and health care, and he didn’t change anything in this respect.”But at the left-wing Haaretz, Yossi Verter wrote that refocusing the campaign was the speech’s key success. Now, Israelis will all be talking about Netanyahu’s marquee issue: Iran.“It’s too early to say whether Bibi’s appearance on Capitol Hill two weeks before the election will stanch his Likud party’s steady decline in the polls and leave him in office for another term,” Verter wrote. “What’s certain is that this week will be dominated by the issue Netanyahu and his campaign staff want to highlight: security, security, security.”JTA and Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.
Day after Netanyahu warning, U.S. and Iran make 'some progress' on nuclear talks-Reuters-By Arshad Mohammed-MAR 4,15-YAHOONEWS
MONTREUX, Switzerland (Reuters) - The U.S. and Iranian foreign ministers wrapped up three days of talks over Iran's nuclear programme on Wednesday, a day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the deal being negotiated was a serious mistake.U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran's Mohammad Javad Zarif have negotiated for more than 10 hours since Monday in the Swiss lakeside town of Montreux, hoping to work out a framework deal by late March."We have made some progress but have a lot of challenges yet ahead," a senior U.S. State Department official told reporters traveling with Kerry."The bottom line here is that (there is) no deal to announce to anybody today, but very intense, hard work, some progress, but tough challenges yet to be resolved," the official said."We expect that we (and the Iranians) will regroup bilaterally, with the European Union present as well, on the 15th of March, location to be confirmed but most likely Geneva."Asked if he thought they had made progress, Zarif told reporters: "We have, but a lot of work remains."However, Netanyahu's controversial speech to the U.S. Congress on Tuesday, where he harshly criticised the diplomatic efforts to resolve the dispute, may make it harder for the Obama administration to sell the potential deal back home.U.S. negotiator Wendy Sherman will brief Israel soon on the talks and Kerry will meet the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany in Paris on Saturday, the senior U.S. official said.Netanyahu argued that rather than preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear arms, a deal would "all but guarantee" that it would one day get the atomic bomb, putting Israel, the wider region and U.S. interests at risk.U.S. President Barack Obama responded within hours saying that Netanyahu had offered no "viable alternatives" to the current course of negotiations.Iran and world powers are trying to put a framework agreement in place by the end of the month, despite the misgivings of Israel, U.S. congressional Republicans and some Gulf Arab states. Such an accord would be followed by a comprehensive agreement to be completed by the end of June.The aim of the negotiations is to persuade Iran to restrain its nuclear program in exchange for relief from sanctions that have crippled the oil exporter's economy.The United States and some of its allies, notably Israel, suspect Iran of using its civil nuclear program as a cover to develop a nuclear weapons capability. Iran denies this, saying it is for peaceful purposes such as generating electricity.(Reporting by Arshad Mohammed and Lucien Libert in Montreux; Editing by Tom Miles/Jeremy Gaunt)
Israel denounces US and EU's Iran diplomacy By Andrew Rettman-MAR 4,15-EUOBSERVER
SAN DIEGO, US, Today, 09:27-The Israeli PM’s anti-Iran speech made a big noise in Washington, but had no immediate impact on US or EU policy. in the Middle East.Republican Party congressmen, and some Democrats, in the US assembly gave Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu a roaring endorsement on Tuesday (3 March).The Israeli leader said the US and EU-brokered non-proliferation deal, currently being discussed in Switzerland, will “pave the way” for Iran to get nuclear weapons within a “year”, or maybe within “weeks”, if it decides to do so.He compared Iran to Nazi Germany, and to Isis, the apocalyptic cult in Iraq and Syria.He also described it as a threat to Israel, to US citizens, and to “all humanity”, adding “the days when Jewish people remain passive in the face of genocidal enemies are over”.US president Barack Obama boycotted Netanyahu’s visit. More than 50 congressmen from the ruling Democratic Party also boycotted the speech.They did it because they saw it as politicking ahead of Israeli elections.They also saw it as a Republican attempt to discredit Obama, with the Netanyahu event organised by the Republican speaker in Congress against White House wishes.For its part, Iran reacted mildly.Its UN ambassador, Gholamali Khoshroo, wrote in the New York Times that Netanyahu’s “scaremongering” is “a smoke screen that relegates the Palestinian question to the margins”. He added that Israeli “aggression and … occupation” of Palestine feeds Isis-type radicalism.But the event did not disrupt the so-called E3+3 nuclear talks.US secretary of state John Kerry told media in Geneva on Tuesday: "We're working away. Productively”.The EU foreign relations chief, Federica Mogherini, who chairs the E3+3 meetings after her predecessor, Catherine Ashton, became her unpaid advisor, sided with Obama."Spreading fears is not helpful at this stage," she said on the Netanyahu speech, AFP reports.Its immediate impact on E3+3 aside, the Obama-Netanyahu rift does pose questions for US, and by extension, EU policy in the Middle East.Analysts say it makes Netanyahu less likely to launch air strikes on Iran - an option he has repeatedly mentioned - while Obama is in power.It also makes Obama less likely to try to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks if Netanyahu is re-elected.Alon Ben-Meir, an international relations scholar at New York University, says the EU, in any case, appears willing to hang on to US coat-tails.“For all intents and purposes, the US has assumed the leading role and Iran also understands that only the US will have, in the final analysis, the last word on any [nuclear] deal that the parties may agree upon”, he told EUobserver.He added that the depth of the US-Israel rift shouldn’t be exaggerated.The State Department, one week prior to Netanyahu’s inflammatory visit, asked Congress for another $3 billion in aid for Israel. Ben-Meir noted that Obama and Netanyahu fundamentally agree that Iran must be stopped from gaining hegemony in the region.“The Obama administration … is currently developing a strategy of containment not related only to the prospect that Iran may obtain [nuclear] weapons, but also on how to contain the fallout of a potential US military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities should that option become necessary", he said.He also said there are limits to how far the US will push Israel to make peace with Palestine.“The US, not now or at any time in the future, will impose sanctions on Israel, nor would it encourage the EU to do so”.
JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36 And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37 For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)
Ten senators tell McConnell they object to fast tracking Iran bill-Democrats object to Republican majority leader’s bid to bypass committee vote, let talks go uninterrupted until end of March By JTA March 5, 2015, 1:32 am-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
Ten senators who caucus with Democrats are objecting to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s plan to bring the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 directly to the Senate floor for a vote, thereby bypassing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.The senators, among them Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), sent a letter to McConnell urging him not to fast track the bill, but rather to allow for negotiations with Iran to continue until at least the March 24 deadline for a political framework agreement. Because a final agreement is not expected until June, there is no reason to rush the vote, the senators wrote.“We are disappointed that you have proceeded outside of regular order, which suggests that the goal of this maneuver is to score partisan political points, rather than pursue a substantive strategy to counter Iran’s nuclear ambitions,” the senators wrote.The senators also wrote they would only vote for the bill after it has gone through regular procedures and been debated by the Foreign Relations Committee. Signing the letter were Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), Bill Nelson (D-Fl.), Joe Donnelly (D-In.), Angus King (I-Me.), Chris Coons (D-De), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)
Nuclear deal with West ‘very close’, Zarif says-Iranian Foreign Minister claims Iran has no interest in nuclear bombs, says Netanyahu is ‘fanning hysteria’By Daniel Bernstein and AP March 5, 2015, 12:29 am 2-the times of israel
Iran is “very close” to achieving a nuclear deal with international powers, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Wednesday.Speaking to NBC News, Zarif said Iran is not seeking to build nuclear weapons. “We do not believe nuclear weapons bring security to anybody, certainly not to us,” Zarif said, adding that he hoped the emerging deal would ensure that Iran’s nuclear program “will always remain peaceful.”He further stated that Iran is prepared to work “around the clock” in order to reach an agreement, which he says is very close.The Foreign Minister claimed the country’s nuclear ambitions are entirely peaceful, intended only for “scientific” advancement. He said a deal will be made possible “once this fear mongering is out,” possibly referring to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s congress speech Tuesday, in which he assailed the emerging nuclear deal and warned it “paves Iran’s path to the bomb.”“There may be people who may have been affected by the type of hysteria that is being fanned by people like Mr. Netenyahu,” Zarif said, adding that “it is useful for everybody to allow this deal to go through.”Zarif said he hoped to reach a deal that would ensure that Iran’s nuclear program “will always remain peaceful.”A senior US official spoke of some progress Wednesday in reaching a nuclear deal with Iran but tamped down expectations of a formal, preliminary deal this month outlining constraints on Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief for the Islamic Republic.The official said the negotiations are aiming for a much looser construct — “an understanding that’s going to have to be filled out with lots of detail” by their late March target date.Once Iran and the six nations negotiating with it reach such a progress report, US President Barack Obama will then determine whether it is grounds to continue talks aimed at a comprehensive deal in June, the official said.Zarif told NBC reaching the deal is now mainly a political issue. “We are very close if the political decision can be made to get to yes, as President Obama said,” he said.
IRAN GUARENTEED NUKES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjj-9YgX-s0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0DaSeiPwPk
And here are the bounderies of the land that Israel will inherit either through war or peace or God in the future. God says its Israels land and only Israels land. They will have every inch God promised them of this land in the future.
Egypt east of the Nile River, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, The southern part of Turkey and the Western Half of Iraq west of the Euphrates. Gen 13:14-15, Psm 105:9,11, Gen 15:18, Exe 23:31, Num 34:1-12, Josh 1:4.ALL THIS LAND ISRAEL WILL DEFINATELY OWN IN THE FUTURE, ITS ISRAELS NOT ISHMAELS LAND.12 TRIBES INHERIT LAND IN THE FUTURE
First poll since Netanyahu’s speech still shows Zionist Union leading-Herzog’s party on 24 seats, Likud on 23, but 47% want PM to continue for another term By Adiv Sterman and Ricky Ben-David March 4, 2015, 8:39 pm 15-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
Even after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Tuesday speech at the US Congress, rival Isaac Herzog’s Zionist Union party would still be the largest Knesset faction following the March 17 elections, according to a Channel 2 poll published Wednesday, the first since the Israeli leader returned from Washington.Based on the survey — conducted among 790 respondents with a 3.5% margin of error — the Zionist Union would receive 24 seats, while the Likud would gain 23.The Joint (Arab) List places third with 13 seats, Yesh Atid and Jewish Home follow with 12 each, and Kulanu with 8. Yisrael Beytenu and Meretz, as well as ultra-Orthodox parties Shas and United Torah Judaism, would all gain 6 seats, while Eli Yishai’s new Yachad party manages to just cross the electoral threshold with 4 Knesset seats.Conducted by the Midgam polling group, the survey further found that 44% of respondents believe Netanyahu’s Washington address strengthened his standings in Israel, 43% said there was no change in the Israeli leaders popularity and 12% said the prime minister had been weakened as a result of the speech.Thirty one percent of polled individuals said the main goal of Netanyahu’s address was to thwart a deal between the P5+1 world powers and Iran over the latter’s contested nuclear program, 29% said the prime minister traveled abroad mainly for campaigning purposes and 30% said they believed the Israeli leader intended to achieve both goals.Despite the slight lead for Zionist Union, 47% of those polled said they wanted to see Netanyahu serve again as prime minister, with Herzog gaining the support of only 28%. Twenty-one percent said they did not know whom they preferred.If the Likud were tasked with forming the coalition, according to Channel 2, its 23 seats could be joined with Jewish Home, 12, Yisrael Beytenu, 6, Kulanu, 8, Shas, 6, UTJ, 6 and Yachad, 4 for a total of 65 seats, giving Netanyahu a slim majority.Should the Zionist Union form a government, it could partner with Meretz’s 6 seats, Yesh Atid’s 12, Kulanu’s 8 and — two unlikely partners — Shas, 6 and Yisrael Beytenu, 6, for a total of 62 mandates, an even slimmer majority than the Likud-led constellation. Shas has said it would refuse to serve in a coalition with Lapid and Liberman has vowed never to sit in a government with Meretz.Since Netanyahu’s speech was announced in January, the prime minister’s critics have accused him of using the US Capitol stage to boost his polls ahead of Israel’s March 17 election. Supporters say his only intention is to defend his country from a looming threat.In Israel’s newspapers, responses to the speech fell along ideological lines. At the pro-Netanyahu daily Israel Hayom, Boaz Bismuth, under the headline “The speech of a historic moment,” wrote that Netanyahu succeeded in transcending politics, as “there are moments in which a leader does what he does not for votes, but for the children … There are moments in history that a leader makes happen.”Elsewhere, pundits were more skeptical of the prime minister’s goals. Nahum Barnea, a staunch Netanyahu critic at Yediot Aharonot, wrote that Netanyahu created “a golden opportunity to leave an impression on voters in Israel, and used it to the fullest.”Netanyahu has been emphasizing the Iranian nuclear threat throughout the campaign, despite polls showing that voters care more about economics this time around. Oded Eran, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, said in light of that, Netanyahu’s speech won’t influence the polls, as “there are problems of housing and cost of living and health care, and he didn’t change anything in this respect.”But at the left-wing Haaretz, Yossi Verter wrote that refocusing the campaign was the speech’s key success. Now, Israelis will all be talking about Netanyahu’s marquee issue: Iran.“It’s too early to say whether Bibi’s appearance on Capitol Hill two weeks before the election will stanch his Likud party’s steady decline in the polls and leave him in office for another term,” Verter wrote. “What’s certain is that this week will be dominated by the issue Netanyahu and his campaign staff want to highlight: security, security, security.”JTA and Times of Israel staff contributed to this report.
Day after Netanyahu warning, U.S. and Iran make 'some progress' on nuclear talks-Reuters-By Arshad Mohammed-MAR 4,15-YAHOONEWS
MONTREUX, Switzerland (Reuters) - The U.S. and Iranian foreign ministers wrapped up three days of talks over Iran's nuclear programme on Wednesday, a day after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the deal being negotiated was a serious mistake.U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Iran's Mohammad Javad Zarif have negotiated for more than 10 hours since Monday in the Swiss lakeside town of Montreux, hoping to work out a framework deal by late March."We have made some progress but have a lot of challenges yet ahead," a senior U.S. State Department official told reporters traveling with Kerry."The bottom line here is that (there is) no deal to announce to anybody today, but very intense, hard work, some progress, but tough challenges yet to be resolved," the official said."We expect that we (and the Iranians) will regroup bilaterally, with the European Union present as well, on the 15th of March, location to be confirmed but most likely Geneva."Asked if he thought they had made progress, Zarif told reporters: "We have, but a lot of work remains."However, Netanyahu's controversial speech to the U.S. Congress on Tuesday, where he harshly criticised the diplomatic efforts to resolve the dispute, may make it harder for the Obama administration to sell the potential deal back home.U.S. negotiator Wendy Sherman will brief Israel soon on the talks and Kerry will meet the foreign ministers of Britain, France and Germany in Paris on Saturday, the senior U.S. official said.Netanyahu argued that rather than preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear arms, a deal would "all but guarantee" that it would one day get the atomic bomb, putting Israel, the wider region and U.S. interests at risk.U.S. President Barack Obama responded within hours saying that Netanyahu had offered no "viable alternatives" to the current course of negotiations.Iran and world powers are trying to put a framework agreement in place by the end of the month, despite the misgivings of Israel, U.S. congressional Republicans and some Gulf Arab states. Such an accord would be followed by a comprehensive agreement to be completed by the end of June.The aim of the negotiations is to persuade Iran to restrain its nuclear program in exchange for relief from sanctions that have crippled the oil exporter's economy.The United States and some of its allies, notably Israel, suspect Iran of using its civil nuclear program as a cover to develop a nuclear weapons capability. Iran denies this, saying it is for peaceful purposes such as generating electricity.(Reporting by Arshad Mohammed and Lucien Libert in Montreux; Editing by Tom Miles/Jeremy Gaunt)
Israel denounces US and EU's Iran diplomacy By Andrew Rettman-MAR 4,15-EUOBSERVER
SAN DIEGO, US, Today, 09:27-The Israeli PM’s anti-Iran speech made a big noise in Washington, but had no immediate impact on US or EU policy. in the Middle East.Republican Party congressmen, and some Democrats, in the US assembly gave Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu a roaring endorsement on Tuesday (3 March).The Israeli leader said the US and EU-brokered non-proliferation deal, currently being discussed in Switzerland, will “pave the way” for Iran to get nuclear weapons within a “year”, or maybe within “weeks”, if it decides to do so.He compared Iran to Nazi Germany, and to Isis, the apocalyptic cult in Iraq and Syria.He also described it as a threat to Israel, to US citizens, and to “all humanity”, adding “the days when Jewish people remain passive in the face of genocidal enemies are over”.US president Barack Obama boycotted Netanyahu’s visit. More than 50 congressmen from the ruling Democratic Party also boycotted the speech.They did it because they saw it as politicking ahead of Israeli elections.They also saw it as a Republican attempt to discredit Obama, with the Netanyahu event organised by the Republican speaker in Congress against White House wishes.For its part, Iran reacted mildly.Its UN ambassador, Gholamali Khoshroo, wrote in the New York Times that Netanyahu’s “scaremongering” is “a smoke screen that relegates the Palestinian question to the margins”. He added that Israeli “aggression and … occupation” of Palestine feeds Isis-type radicalism.But the event did not disrupt the so-called E3+3 nuclear talks.US secretary of state John Kerry told media in Geneva on Tuesday: "We're working away. Productively”.The EU foreign relations chief, Federica Mogherini, who chairs the E3+3 meetings after her predecessor, Catherine Ashton, became her unpaid advisor, sided with Obama."Spreading fears is not helpful at this stage," she said on the Netanyahu speech, AFP reports.Its immediate impact on E3+3 aside, the Obama-Netanyahu rift does pose questions for US, and by extension, EU policy in the Middle East.Analysts say it makes Netanyahu less likely to launch air strikes on Iran - an option he has repeatedly mentioned - while Obama is in power.It also makes Obama less likely to try to restart Israeli-Palestinian peace talks if Netanyahu is re-elected.Alon Ben-Meir, an international relations scholar at New York University, says the EU, in any case, appears willing to hang on to US coat-tails.“For all intents and purposes, the US has assumed the leading role and Iran also understands that only the US will have, in the final analysis, the last word on any [nuclear] deal that the parties may agree upon”, he told EUobserver.He added that the depth of the US-Israel rift shouldn’t be exaggerated.The State Department, one week prior to Netanyahu’s inflammatory visit, asked Congress for another $3 billion in aid for Israel. Ben-Meir noted that Obama and Netanyahu fundamentally agree that Iran must be stopped from gaining hegemony in the region.“The Obama administration … is currently developing a strategy of containment not related only to the prospect that Iran may obtain [nuclear] weapons, but also on how to contain the fallout of a potential US military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities should that option become necessary", he said.He also said there are limits to how far the US will push Israel to make peace with Palestine.“The US, not now or at any time in the future, will impose sanctions on Israel, nor would it encourage the EU to do so”.
JEREMEIAH 49:35-37 (IN IRAN AT THE BUSHEHR OR ARAK NUKE SITE SOME BELIEVE)
35 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; Behold, I will break the bow of Elam,(IRAN/BUSHEHR NUCLEAR SITE) the chief of their might.(MOST DANGEROUS NUKE SITE IN IRAN)
36 And upon Elam will I bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven,(IRANIANS SCATTERED OR MASS IMIGARATION) and will scatter them toward all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come.(WORLD IMMIGRATION)
37 For I will cause Elam (IRAN-BUSHEHR NUKE SITE) to be dismayed before their enemies, and before them that seek their life: and I will bring evil upon them, even my fierce anger,(ISRAELS NUKES POSSIBLY) saith the LORD; and I will send the sword after them, till I have consumed them:(IRAN AND ITS NUKE SITES DESTROYED)
Ten senators tell McConnell they object to fast tracking Iran bill-Democrats object to Republican majority leader’s bid to bypass committee vote, let talks go uninterrupted until end of March By JTA March 5, 2015, 1:32 am-THE TIMES OF ISRAEL
Ten senators who caucus with Democrats are objecting to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s plan to bring the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act of 2015 directly to the Senate floor for a vote, thereby bypassing the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.The senators, among them Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), sent a letter to McConnell urging him not to fast track the bill, but rather to allow for negotiations with Iran to continue until at least the March 24 deadline for a political framework agreement. Because a final agreement is not expected until June, there is no reason to rush the vote, the senators wrote.“We are disappointed that you have proceeded outside of regular order, which suggests that the goal of this maneuver is to score partisan political points, rather than pursue a substantive strategy to counter Iran’s nuclear ambitions,” the senators wrote.The senators also wrote they would only vote for the bill after it has gone through regular procedures and been debated by the Foreign Relations Committee. Signing the letter were Sens. Ben Cardin (D-Md.), Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), Bill Nelson (D-Fl.), Joe Donnelly (D-In.), Angus King (I-Me.), Chris Coons (D-De), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.)
Nuclear deal with West ‘very close’, Zarif says-Iranian Foreign Minister claims Iran has no interest in nuclear bombs, says Netanyahu is ‘fanning hysteria’By Daniel Bernstein and AP March 5, 2015, 12:29 am 2-the times of israel
Iran is “very close” to achieving a nuclear deal with international powers, Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif said Wednesday.Speaking to NBC News, Zarif said Iran is not seeking to build nuclear weapons. “We do not believe nuclear weapons bring security to anybody, certainly not to us,” Zarif said, adding that he hoped the emerging deal would ensure that Iran’s nuclear program “will always remain peaceful.”He further stated that Iran is prepared to work “around the clock” in order to reach an agreement, which he says is very close.The Foreign Minister claimed the country’s nuclear ambitions are entirely peaceful, intended only for “scientific” advancement. He said a deal will be made possible “once this fear mongering is out,” possibly referring to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s congress speech Tuesday, in which he assailed the emerging nuclear deal and warned it “paves Iran’s path to the bomb.”“There may be people who may have been affected by the type of hysteria that is being fanned by people like Mr. Netenyahu,” Zarif said, adding that “it is useful for everybody to allow this deal to go through.”Zarif said he hoped to reach a deal that would ensure that Iran’s nuclear program “will always remain peaceful.”A senior US official spoke of some progress Wednesday in reaching a nuclear deal with Iran but tamped down expectations of a formal, preliminary deal this month outlining constraints on Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief for the Islamic Republic.The official said the negotiations are aiming for a much looser construct — “an understanding that’s going to have to be filled out with lots of detail” by their late March target date.Once Iran and the six nations negotiating with it reach such a progress report, US President Barack Obama will then determine whether it is grounds to continue talks aimed at a comprehensive deal in June, the official said.Zarif told NBC reaching the deal is now mainly a political issue. “We are very close if the political decision can be made to get to yes, as President Obama said,” he said.
