06/ 7/2013 VATICAN INSIDER
Bilateral Vatican-Israel Commission meets in Rome
The Commission expects conclusion to the 20 years of negotiations by the end of 2013
lisa palmieri-billig rome “I believe that the problems that remain can be resolved. They can be bridged and an agreement is within reach” said Israel’s Ambassador to the Holy See, Zion Evrony, at a very cordial reception in his home concluding two days of negotiations in the Vatican of the Bilateral Permanent Working Commission between the Holy See and the State of Israel.The delegation of the Holy See was composed of 12 members, including officials of the Secretariat of State of the Congregation for Oriental Churches, the present and former Apostolic Nuncios in Israel, Greek Melkite officials in Israel, legal and financial advisers, the Custody of the Holy Land, etc. The Israeli delegation had 9 delegates, including TOP Foreign Ministry officials, legal experts and Israel’s Ambassador to the Holy See. The joint communiqué states “The negotiations took place in a thoughtful and constructive atmosphere. The Commission took notice that significant progress was made and the parties committed themselves to accelerate negotiations on the remaining issues, and look forward to an expedited conclusion in the near term. The Parties have agreed on future steps and to hold the next Plenary meeting by December 2013 in Jerusalem.” For 20 years following the signing of the Fundamental Agreement on December 30, 1993 which ushered in diplomatic recognition between the two States, this Commission has been meeting at least twice a year in Rome and Jerusalem to iron out remaining obstacles to a definitive accord regarding the legal status, economic and tax issues of the Catholic Church in Israel as proposed by Article 10, paragraph 2 of the Fundamental Agreement.Both delegations, headed respectively by Msgr. Antoine Camilleri, Under-Secretary for Relations with States and Mr. Zeev Elkin, Israel’s Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, agree that substantial issues have been smoothed out and only “technical” problems remain to be solved. They believe a conclusion is at hand, probably at the next meeting scheduled for Jerusalem before the end of the year.It is expected, among other details, that all Church property will be declared tax-free with the exception of Church-owned businesses.Ambassador Evrony, alluding to repeated declarations in past years regarding the proximity of the conclusion of negotiations, said to delegation members and media guests, “I know that some of you will be skeptical and say, ‘We have heard this before’, but this time I believe we are indeed closer to the finish line and there is a good reason for optimism”.“Some say [we have been negotiating for] too long, others may say what are a few years in 2000 years of relations?” He noted that this year marks some very significant dates: the 20th anniversary of the signing of the Fundamental Agreement (June 3); the 50th anniversary of the passing away of Pope John XXIII and the 46th anniversary “today, June 5th” of the outbreak of the 6-Day “war of self defense” (alluding to the amassing of troops against Israel on the borders of Syria, Jordan and Egypt accompanied by threats of imminent annihilation ).“These events directly or indirectly are related to our negotiations because they have significantly changed Jewish-Catholic relations and the geostrategic situation in the Middle East” said Israel’s Ambassador.Msgr. Camilleri, head of the Holy See’s delegation, stressed “how positive and rich the atmosphere was”. He paid tribute, along with all members of both delegations, to the dedicated and long-term commitment of Ambassador Behij Mansour, Director of the Inter-Religious Affairs Department of Israel’s Foreign Affairs Ministry, who “played an instrumental role in these negotiations for seven years and now is leaving us to be Ambassador in Santo Domingo”, as Ambassador Evrony stated. The official Joint Communiqué of the Bilateral Commission also “acknowledged the contribution of Ambassador Bahij Mansour to the negotiations” and wished him “success in his new position.”The Holy See’s Under-Secretary for Relations between States pointed to “today’s highlight – the brief moments shared with Pope Francis during a private audience.”“The meeting was moving, significant, and unforgettable” said Israel’s Ambassador to the Holy See. He brings “a universal message of modesty, caring for the poor, struggle for peace and care for the environment.”The Israeli delegation expressed hopes that Francis would visit Israel next year, where he has been officially invited by President Peres as well as Deputy Foreign Minister Elkin. “He will be warmly greeted by members of all religions” said Ambassador Evrony.
LUKEWARM CHURCHES
REVELATION 3:15-19
15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I(GOD) will spue (VOMIT) thee out of my mouth.
17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:
18 I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear; and anoint thine eyes with eyesalve, that thou mayest see.
19 As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten: be zealous therefore, and repent.
06/ 7/2013 VATICAN INSIDER
Belgium’s Cardinal Danneels okays same-sex unions
Sparks fly following a statement the cardinal made recently, saying: “I think it’s a positive development that states are free to open up civil marriage for gays if they want, but such unions should be given a different name than marriage.” He also pointed out that the Church has changed its idea on suicide
Marco Tosatti ROMe Belgian cardinal Godfried Daneels – who recently turned 80, losing his eligibility to vote in the Conclave as well as his position in Rome’s various Congregations – has come under the spotlight for some controversial statements he made regarding same-sex unions and the protests held by Catholics and non-Catholics against the "Taubita law", France’s same-sex marriage law.“I think it’s a positive development that states are free to open up civil marriage for gays if they want,” Cardinal Daneels apparently told Dutch language newspaperDe Tijd. He added, however, that such unions should be given a different name than marriage. In the eyes of the Church, a union between two people of the same sex is not “real marriage”. Real marriage can only be between a man and a woman. “But insofar as it is legal” “the Church does not have a say” in such laws, he apparently added.Belgian French language newspaper L’Echo also quoted the cardinal saying that the French should obey the law and not oppose same-sex marriage. “We need to understand: The Church has never objected to the fact that there is a sort of 'marriage' between homosexuals – however we're talking about a sort of marriage. This is not the same as the true marriage between a man and a woman, so we need to find another word for the dictionary,” the cardinal said.According to Danneels, today’s Church has developed a more “nuanced,” position without being “fixated” on moral principles. “How can a man not identify with his orientation? I think there is a clear evolution in the thinking of the Church.” He went on to compare the situation to the treatment of people who had committed suicide and were therefore denied burial in a Catholic cemetery, saying the Church now looks at the "totality" of the person.Danneels was long known as one of the three European principals of the “liberal” bloc of the Catholic Church leadership. In the last two Conclaves he was also considered a possible candidate to succeed John Paul II – who created him cardinal in 1983 – and Benedict XVI. But his chances were radically weakened after all the criticism he received for his handling of sex-abuse cases in the Church.2008 was a tough year for him after he was called to give evidence on cases of sex abuse. The cardinal stated he knew nothing about it (this was the first time a cardinal appeared before a Belgian court). But when Benedict accepted his resignation two years later, Cardinal Danneels had become entangled in the case of Fr. Roger Vangheluwe, a priest who was accused of abusing his grandson in the 70s and 80s. The abuse apparently began when Fr. Vangheluwe was a priest and carried on when he was bishop. Cardinal Danneels allegedly advised the victim to delay pressing charges until Vangheluwe, who was Bishop of Bruges at the time, had handed in his resignation. The bishop’s grandson then promptly handed a voice recording of his conversation with the cardinal to the press. One of the newspapers, De Standaard, justified Danneel’s behaviour to a certain extent, describing his action as "containment, nothing more." It added that Danneels' "only aim is to avoid having the case made public so many years after the facts. The police questioned the cardinal on the case, which a priest had apparently tried to alert him about in 1996 but was ignored. The case tainted the cardinal’s reputation so much that church attendance in Belgium and vocation numbers reached an all-time low.
06/ 6/2013 VATICAN INSIDER