Liberman Turns Heads in Praising Kerry's Offer
Foreign
Minister Avigdor Liberman turns some heads, urges Israel to accept the
peace deal currently being brokered by Washington.-By Elad Benari, Canada=First Publish: 1/10/2014, 10:30 PM-Israelnationalnews
Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman-Flash 90
“It’s the best proposal we can get and we really appreciate the efforts of Secretary of State John Kerry. He has really put a lot of energy into the issue,” Liberman told the Telegraph.He added that it was “crucial” for Israelis to maintain contact with the PA, no matter how limited the prospects of success.“With or without a comprehensive solution we will continue to live together and continue to be neighbors. There are many problems on the ground, so this direct contact, this negotiation, these talks - it’s very important to keep alive and maintain,” said Liberman.Kerry has set the two sides a target of April to reach a “framework agreement” that would work as a guideline for a final peace deal.The goal of the deal is to establish an independent Palestinian state and settle such contentious issues as the jurisdiction of Jerusalem and the so-called “right of return”.Liberman waved away several years of hostility between the Obama White House and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu as “differences between friends”.While he still criticized PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, whom he called to remove in a 2012 letter to EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton, he did not refer to Abbas as a “diplomatic terrorist” in the Telegraph interview.Instead, he said, there is a question mark over whether or not Abbas “can deliver the goods” in the peace talks.“You must be ready for compromise, but I am not sure he is able. But we must check [wait for] this possibility because we [Israelis] are ready to go far,” said Liberman.He declared that Arab Israeli citizens who remain in Israel must decide where their true loyalty lies, Israel or the potential future “Palestine.”“They live in some kind of schizophrenia, they don’t know if they are Israeli citizens or if they are Palestinians. Even during our football games you see Palestinian flags,” said Liberman, who has proposed that land Israel swaps with a future Palestinian state include the cities where some 300,000 Arabs live.He admitted, however, that it was perhaps the “mistake of leadership, of our governments - more than Arab mistakes” that has created division.Liberman’s moderate tone, compared to his tough talk in his previous term in office, caught the attention of the Telegraph, which noted that his “apparent transformation from hardliner to pragmatist will boost hopes that this time could be different, and that one of the world’s most obstinate and damaging conflicts could be at last resolved.”
The newspaper that the “firebrand politician” who said that Gaza should be treated like “Chechnya” and who called for the execution of Arab-Israeli MKs who had met members of Hamas was gone.Liberman told the Telegraph, perhaps a sign of his new persona, that his biggest challenge as foreign minister was to have Israel associated with issues other than “the Palestinian conflict, terror and Iran”.He wanted, he said, to “open the eyes of international community to our achievements – to our very successful economy, agriculture, water management, science, high tech industry.”(Arutz Sheva’s North American Desk is keeping you updated until the start of Shabbat in New York. The time posted automatically on all Arutz Sheva articles, however, is Israeli time.)
Labor Party Head Not Opposed to Land Swaps
Opposition leader Yitzchak Herzog said that he would not be opposed to the principle of a “land swap” with a Palestinian entity.-By David Lev-First Publish: 1/9/2014, 12:55 PM-Israelnationalnews
MK Yitzchak Herzog-Flash 90
US denies claims that Iran deal has been finalized
State Dept reports progress in technical talks to rein in nuclear program, but maintains there are still gaps
The US State Department quickly
dismissed an Iranian state television report Friday that negotiators in
Geneva had resolved all outstanding issues between the parties in regard
to an interim nuclear agreement.
State
Department spokesperson Jen Psaki told reporters that technical talks
were making good progress, but that a deal had not been cemented.“There have been a few outstanding issues, but
at this point, the reports that everything has been finalized are
incorrect,” she said.Earlier Friday, the Islamic Republic News
Agency quoted Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, who said that the
sides had resolved all issues and that the negotiators would now turn to
their respective governments for approval. Over the last two days, the
six major world powers involved in the talks, the so-called P5+1, were
represented by the European Union.
“All the outstanding political and technical
issues were resolved but the final decision will be taken by the
respective capitals,” IRNA quoted Araqchi, who reportedly added
that Iran and the P5+1 would have two days to accept of reject the deal.Araqchi told Reuters that the negotiators had found “solutions for every difference.”“Now we are taking the solutions … home, all
of us. Hopefully tomorrow we can either confirm or not, but hopefully
confirm,” he said.An EU
spokesperson said “very good” progress had been made “on all of the
pertinent issues,” reported Reuters, but the official said any
developments on terms would have to be validated by more senior
officials.The interim deal — limiting Iran’s nuclear
program in return for the easing of non-core sanctions — was reached in
Geneva in November but has not been implemented because of disagreements
over “technical issues.”In Washington, DC, congressional aides said
Friday that 59 US senators now support tougher sanctions on Iran,
despite ongoing negotiations.The Obama administration has warned that such a
measure would risk scuttling the talks, but lawmakers who first seemed
receptive to that view are now shifting and looking to put more pressure
on Tehran to make concessions on it’s nuclear program.Iran maintains that its nuclear program is for
peaceful use only, a claim that the international community has largely
dismissed.