ITALY WANTS TROOPS IN GAZA

THE EU DICTATOR

REVELATION 6:1-2,13:1-3,7-9,16
1 And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard, as it were the noise of thunder, one of the four beasts saying, Come and see.
2 And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.(THIS IS THE EU DICTATOR)
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.(7 HEADS ARE THE 7TH WORLD EMPIRE IN HISTORY (THE EU) AS WELL AS THE VATICAN WHICH IS BUILT ON 7 HILLS. 10 HORNS ARE 10 KINGS THAT ARISE FROM THE EU, THEN #11 COMES ON THE SCENE BECOMES THE HEAD OF 3 OUNTRIES AND THEN THE EU DICTATOR, COMES FROM 1 OF THE 3 COUNTRIES THAT RULE FOR THIS TERM. I BELIEVE THE 3 COUNTRIES RULING AT THE TIME ARE SPAIN AND 2 OF THE ORIGINAL 6 THAT STARTED THE EU. FROM 1 OF THESE 3 COUNTRIES COME THE FUTURE EU DICTATOR PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION WHO GUARENTEES ISRAELS SECURITY FOR A LAND FOR PEACE 7 YEAR TREATY.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.(THE JEWISH EU DICTATOR GETS HIS POWER FROM SATAN,HE COMES FROM THE OCCULT).
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.(THE DICTATOR HAS A FALSE RESURRECTION. JUST LIKE JESUS HAD A LITERAL RESURRECTION THIS DICTATOR GETS MURDERED AT THE 3 1/2 YR MARK OF THR 7 YEAR TREATY AND COMES BACK TO LIFE. THIS IS HOW HE CAN CLAIM TO BE GOD AND GET AWAY WITH IT AND CONTROL THE WHOLE EARTH.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
9 If any man have an ear, let him hear.
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

DANIEL 11:36-40
36 And the king shall do according to his will;(EU PRESIDENT) and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS A EUROPEAN JEW) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(HES A MILITARY GINIUS) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds (CONTROL HEZBOLLAH,AL-QUAIDA MURDERERS ETC) with a strange god, whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide the land for gain.
40 And at the time of the end shall the king of the south(EGYPT) push at him:(EU DICTATOR PROTECTING ISRAELS SECURITY) and the king of the north(RUSSIA) shall come against him like a whirlwind, with chariots, and with horsemen, and with many ships; and he shall enter into the countries, and shall overflow and pass over.

EUROPEAN UNION ARMY

DANIEL 7:23-25
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast (EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADING BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings(10 NATIONS) that shall arise: and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.( BE HEAD OF 3 NATIONS)
25 And he (EU PRESIDENT) shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.(3 1/2 YRS)

DANIEL 8:23-25
23 And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king (EU DICTATOR) of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences,(FROM THE OCCULT) shall stand up.
24 And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power:(SATANS POWER) and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people.
25 And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes;(JESUS) but he shall be broken without hand.

DANIEL 11:36-39
36 And the king (EU DICTATOR) shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation be accomplished: for that that is determined shall be done.
37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers,(THIS EU DICTATOR IS JEWISH) nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.(CLAIM TO BE GOD)
38 But in his estate shall he honour the God of forces:(WAR) and a god whom his fathers knew not shall he honour with gold, and silver, and with precious stones, and pleasant things.
39 Thus shall he do in the most strong holds with a strange god,(DESTROY TERROR GROUPS) whom he shall acknowledge and increase with glory: and he shall cause them to rule over many,(HIS ARMY LEADERS) and shall divide the land for gain.

REVELATION 19:19
19 And I saw the beast,(EU LEADER) and the kings of the earth, and their armies, gathered together to make war against him that sat on the horse,(JESUS) and against his army.(THE RAPTURED CHRISTIANS)

Italian FM supports sending international observers to Gaza Strip

Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D'Alema expressed Thursday his support to the idea of sending multinational forces to the Palestinian territories, especially the Gaza Strip, which should be decided by the United Nations. Of course we welcome sending these multinational forces to the Palestinian territories, but this decision is the United Nations', D'Alema told reporters in a joint news conference with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the West Bank city of Ramallah. D'Alema, however, held that such a decision is not easy to be taken before a ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinians take effect and the peace talks resumed.
The presence of international forces must aim at implementing the agreements rather than acting as an alternative for the agreements, said D'Alema, calling on the international community to offer financial and logistic support to the Palestinians if peace talks with Israel resumed. President Abbas said that there have been talks inside the Arab League on how to revive the peace process and come up with a united Arab stance regarding the frozen peace process. He added that the talks also discuss activating the UN resolutions on the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.

The Palestinian National Authority (PNA) has been working on lifting siege on the Hamas-led government and consequently on the Palestinian people, said Abbas. D'Alema arrived in the Palestinian territories en route from Amman earlier Thursday. He held talks with Abbas before holding the joint press conference. The Italian foreign minister is scheduled to meet Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in Tel Aviv, followed by talks with his Israeli counterpart Tzipi Livni on Friday. Source: Xinhua

Italy: PA Will Establish a New Gov’t That Recognizes Israel 11:55 Sep 08, '06 / 15 Elul 5766 (IsraelNN.com)

Italian Foreign Minister Massimo D’Alema told Vice Premier Shimon Peres that the PA (Palestinian Authority) is in the midst of negotiations towards forming a new government, one that will accept the demands of the international community. D’Alema stated that recognition of Israel is included among those demands, as well as a cessation of hostility and terror. He added that he believes that the new PA government will renew negotiations with Israel towards a final status agreement.

One state good: Two states bad08.09.2006 - 09:48 CET By Peter Sain ley Berry

EUOBSERVER / COMMENT - Javier Solana, the European Union's High Representative for Common and Security Policy, reacted sharply to President Chirac's charge last week that the EU had not played a sufficiently robust role in trying to halt the recent Lebanon war. Other EU leaders endorsed his line, accusing Chirac of merely seeking a diversion from his domestic problems.For what it is worth I still think that Chirac was right. The EU, given its importance in the world, is marked by a noticeably lightweight diplomatic punch. And whatever good it may do between times, the Union is not known for its ability to rise to an occasion. Sudden crises always seem to find it at sixes and sevens.

I suggested last week that the EU's strategic interests in the eastern Mediterranean required a somewhat more vigorous policy to promoting peace and stability in that region whose peacefulness and stability continues to deteriorate. The various countries and their several problems are linked. But at their root is the conflict between Arab and Jew over the disputed territory of what was once Palestine; a conflict that has seeded a more general struggle between Islam and the West and between different factions within Islam for the right to lead this struggle.The EU is committed, with a panoply of diplomatic forces, to seeking a solution to this fundamental conflict via the Middle East 'roadmap,' designed to lead, were ever its directions to be followed, to a 'two-state' solution: separate Israeli and Palestinian states living side by side in peace and harmony.

Yet 'two-state' solutions do not have a commendable track record of success, nor a happy history. For it is easier to separate two peoples or two religions than it is to separate the attachment of nations to what they continue to insist is 'their' land. The idea of partitioning states is, moreover, a diplomatic invention of relatively recent origin.It began, perhaps, in the mind of an outsider - a Welsh-speaking Welshman from the mountains of North Wales, who rose from humble beginnings to become Prime Minister of Britain and war leader in 1916. Coming from a small country whose language and culture had long been under severe erosion in a predominantly English Britain, David Lloyd George espoused the cause of small nations, first the South African Boers and later the Belgians.

For him it must have seemed natural to regard non-conformist Wales as somehow partitioned from England behind a fortress of earthworks and mountains. Surely, this was how small nations could breathe and worship securely next to the great neighbours? When the Irish rebellion of 1916 came to settlement with the country broadly divided between Protestant Unionists in the north and republican Catholics in the south, the idea of partition - of a 'two-state' solution - must have seemed natural.And with the distraction first of the Irish civil war and then the Second World War masking events on the ground, partition must have seemed a workable solution when, a quarter of a century later, Britain was faced with a comparable problem: preparing religiously divided India for independence.

Just as the Protestants in northern Belfast had refused Catholic rule from Dublin, so Mr Jinnah's Muslims refused to be governed by a Hindu majority. Going one better than Lloyd George in Ireland, the Attlee government carved India into three, with the bloodiest chaos imaginable erupting. Almost sixty years on Pakistan and India remain deeply distrustful and armed against each other with nuclear weapons; hardly a successful advertisement for the 'two-state' solution.At the same time the wheels had been set in motion for the partition of Palestine to create a Jewish state. That partition has been as unsuccessful as the others in bringing about stability.Paradoxically, one thing that large numbers of Israelis and Palestinians agree upon is the integral nature of the former Palestine. There are many Israelis who are prepared to insist on their right to settlement over the entire territory, while the Palestinians aspire to revert to the status quo ante - the time before Israel existed. Whatever compromises each are prepared to concede in the interests of peace, both populations have wider aspirations. And the only way of reconciling such aspirations would be to seek a one-state solution.

That may sound naïve. Of course Arabs and Jews, with such a legacy of conflict and bitterness, could not live easily together. Nor would Israelis ever wish to surrender democratic control over their own security and livelihoods. Nevertheless, the example of South Africa is instructive. The rich, white inhabitants of Capetown and Johannesburg must have felt equally threatened at one time. And there are self-evidently many common interests across the people and the territory of Israel-Palestine.There is a story from the dark days of the Bosnian War. Three soldiers meet at a crossroads, A Croat, a Serb and a Bosnian. Each prepares to shoot the other two.Up pops a frog. Guys, he says, I will grant each of you one wish. He turns to the Croat who says, I want that Serb soldier - dead. The frog turns to the Serb. I want that Croat soldier - dead. Now comes the Bosnian's turn.Are you going to grant those guys their wishes? he asks. Yes, says the frog. The Bosnian pauses a moment.In that case, he replies, I think I'll have a cup of coffee.
Today if the frog returned the three former combatants might all be drinking coffee and asking the frog instead how it is possible to govern a country with 64 different ministers of education - or whatever the current figure is. The suspicions still run deep, but, with communities protected by federation, Bosnia is making real, if hesitant, progress. And the people have stopped killing each other. Even the greatest partition of all - Europe's Iron Curtain - was ultimately a failure. We should learn from this history and now be seeking to remove partitions wherever they be found rather than extolling new divisions. There are lessons for Cyprus here, too.The author is editor of EuropaWorld