EUS POWER TO MAKE 7 YR TREATY NOW IN PLACE

I JUST LOVE THE IDEA THAT IN BRAZIL THE CHURCH WANTS TO BUILD A REPLACA OF THE 2ND TEMPLE AND WORSHIP IN IT.THIS MIGHT BE THE INCIDENT THAT MAKES THE ISRAELIS JELOUS AND FINALLY OPEN THEIR EYES FROM BLINDNESS TO REBUILD THE THIRD TEMPLE.SINCE THE ISRAELIS BELIEVE THAT GOD WILL REBUILD THE 3RD TEMPLE FOR THEM.WHEN THE BIBLE SAYS THE ISRAELIS TAKE THE ACTION-(REBUILD) TO REBUILD THE 3RD TEMPLE AND IF ITS GODS TIME FOR IT TO BE REBUILT TO FULFILL PROPHECY IT WILL HAPPEN.

I NOW BELIEVE AN ATTACK ON IRAN MIGHT BE WITHIN THE NEXT 8 DAYS AS IRAN IS TO LAUNCH NUCLEAR REACTOR AT BUHEHR STARTING NEXT WEEK.JOHN BOLTON THINKS ISRAEL MUST ATTACK IN THE NEXT 8 DAYS TO PREVENT IRAN FROM PUTING THE LOADED URANIUM INTO THE FIRST NUCLEAR REACTOR ON AUGUST 21,2010.PROPHECY COULD BE COMING INTO PLAY BIGTIME NOW IF ISRAEL GOES AFTER IRANS SITE HERE.

http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/08/13/irans-nuclear-power-plant-to-be-fueled/?test=latestnews (VIDEO)
Iran’s Nuclear Power Plant to be Fueled
August 13, 2010 - 3:00 PM | by: Amy Kellogg

Moscow has announced that it will start loading fuel into Iran's first nuclear power plant on August 21st.The start seasons for Bushehr have been set and then pushed back many times over the years, but with this specific date now in the calendar, experts believe it is likely to finally happen next week.It has been a very long project. Internationally renowned nuclear proliferation expert Mark Fitzpatrick says, This was a white elephant of a project. They had a German designed reactor which was bombed in the Iran-Iraq war. Russia then took it over and tried to graft a Russian designed reactor onto the German design. There wasn’t a very good match between the two designs. It took a lot of time and effort to get it to come out right.It's a project that began before the Islamic Revolution. As it is a straightforward nuclear power plant, and does not involve sensitive or proscribed technology, it is not an obvious proliferation risk, but there have been concerns about the safety of the plant which sits right on the Persian Gulf. Fitzpatrick says,Many of Iran’s neighbors are very worried about the environmental consequences of a nuclear power plant in an area that is seismically unstable, based on a Russian design that has had historical problems. The Russians have learned from the mistakes of Chernobyl. The Bushehr power plant has got an enclosure. It is not the kind of unsafe reactor that created so many problems 20 years ago. But there are still some environmental concerns.Bushehr does not fall under the UN sanctions, and has not been the subject of Security Council resolutions because it does not involve uranium enrichment. The concerns about uranium enriched at the level needed for fuel, is that it once the enrichment technology is mastered, Iran could eventually potentially bump the material up to a higher, purer grade suitable for weapons.

The fact that Russia will be supplying the fuel for the new reactor begs the question of why Iran is enriching uranium in the first place.White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs said, It quite clearly, I think, underscores that Iran does not need its own enrichment capability if its intentions as it states are for a peaceful nuclear program. So I think in many ways this is a concept that closes the fuel loop and I think again it demonstrates and proves to the world that if the Iranians are sincere about a peaceful program, their needs can be met without undertaking its own enrichment program.Not only does Iran not need fuel for this reactor, but according to Mark Fitzpatrick, it can't even manufacture the fuel for Bushehr.Only Russia can produce fuel for that reactor. Iran doesn't have a fuel production line. It doesn't have the specifications from Russia for this reactor.Iran has pledged it will build its own nuclear reactors at some point but experts wonder how feasible that is. Fitzpatrick said,They would need foreign assistance for that. I am not sure Russia would want to go ahead with another project that caused so many headaches.And with Iran isolated and its nuclear program at the center of controversy, it is not clear what other countries might step up to the plate.

Fitzpatrick says the spent fuel from Bushehr will go back to Russia. but it has to cool for three years before that can happen. One of the minor proliferation risks is that the fuel could potentially be diverted in that window. But Bushehr is monitored by international inspectors. More than anything, it seems, what its completion means is Iran is now able to say that it is the exclusive club of industrialized countries that has nuclear power.
Read more: http://liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/08/13/irans-nuclear-power-plant-to-be-fueled/?test=latestnews#ixzz0wazNgUz0

John Bolton: Russia's Loading of Nuke Fuel Into Iran Plant Means Aug. 21 Deadline for Israeli Attack Friday, 13 Aug 2010 01:41 PM By: David A. Patten-NEWSMAX

News that Russia will load nuclear fuel rods into an Iranian reactor has touched off a countdown to a point of no return, a deadline by which Israel would have to launch an attack on Iran's Bushehr reactor before it becomes effectively immune to any assault, says former Bush administration U.N. Ambassador John R. Bolton. Once the fuel rods are loaded, Bolton told Fox News on Friday afternoon, it makes it essentially immune from attack by Israel. Because once the rods are in the reactor an attack on the reactor risks spreading radiation in the air, and perhaps into the water of the Persian Gulf.Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin declared in March that Russia would start the Bushehr reactor this summer. But the announcement from a spokesman for Russia's state atomic agency to Reuters Friday sent international diplomats scrambling to head off a crisis. The story immediately became front-page news in Israel, which has laid precise plans to carry out an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities while going along with President Obama's plans to use international sanctions and diplomatic persuasion to convince Iran's clerics not to go nuclear.

Bolton made it clear that it is widely assumed that any Israeli attack on the Bushehr reactor must take place before the reactor is loaded with fuel rods.If they're going to do it that's the window that they have, Bolton declared. Otherwise as I said before, once the rods are in the reactor, if you attack the reactor you're going to open it up and radiation will escape at least into the atmosphere and possibly into the waters of the Persian Gulf. So most people think that neither Israel nor the United States, come to that, would attack the reactor after it's been fueled.Bolton cited the 1981 Israeli attack on Saddam Hussein's Osirak reactor outside Baghdad and the September 2007 Israeli attack on a North Korean reactor being built in Syria. Both of those strikes came before fuel rods were loaded into those reactors.So if it's going to happen in Bushehr it has to happen before the fuel rods go in, Bolton said. The conversation that touched off the de facto deadline for Israeli military action was a telephone conversation with wire services involving Sergei Novikov, a spokesman for Rosatom, the Russian Energy State Nuclear Corp. Novikov said: The fuel will be loaded on Aug 21. This is the start of the physical launch of the reactor.From that moment the Bushehr plant will be officially considered a nuclear-energy installation, Novikov said, adding that the head of Rosatom, Sergei Kiriyenko, will visit Bushehr Aug. 21 to conduct a ceremony for the event.

According to Bolton, once the reactor is operational, it is only a matter of time before it begins producing plutonium that could be used in a nuclear weapon.And in the normal operation of this reactor, in just a fairly short period of time, you could get substantial amounts of plutonium to use as nuclear weapons, Bolton told Fox. Russia, which is operating under a $1 billion contract with Iran, has spent more than a decade building the reactor. If Russia moves forward with its plan to fuel the reactor, it could be seen as a major setback to the Obama administration's strategy of engaging Russian leaders in order to win their cooperation.The U.S. urged them not to send the Iranian's fuel rods, Bolton said. They did that. The Obama administration has urged them not to insert the fuel rods in the reactors, but as they've just announced that will begin next week. What that does over time is help Iran get another route to nuclear weapons through the plutonium they could reprocess out of the spent fuel rods.The developments mean Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu soon may face a stark choice: Attack the Bushehr reactor in the next 8 days, or allow it to become operational despite the certainty it would greatly enhance Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons. Russian leaders have said the Bushehr reactor project is being closely monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN's nuclear watchdog group. According to Iran's ISNA news agency, IAEA inspectors will be on hand to observe the fuel-rod loading process that is now scheduled to begin Aug. 21.According to Russian officials, Iran has promised in writing to send all spent fuel rods from Bushehr back to Russia for reprocessing, to ensure they cannot be used for nuclear weapons.Bolton said the reactor has been a hole in American foreign policy for over a decade.The failure to demand it be shut down began in the Bush years, he said, and continues with the Obama administration under what I believe is the mistaken theory that Iran is entitled to the peaceful use of nuclear energy.I don't think Iran is entitled to that, or I don't think we ought to allow it to happen, because they're manifestly violating any number of obligations under the non-proliferation treaty not to seek nuclear weapons. But this has been a hole in American policy for some number of years, and Iran and Russia are obviously exploiting it, Bolton said.Russia’s move would put Iran in a much better position overall, he said, adding, I think this is a very delicate point, as I say, it closes off to the Israelis one possible target for pre-emptive military action.U.N. sanctions against Iran, he said, have not had and will not have any material effect on Iran's push to have deliverable nuclear weapons.

DANIEL 7:23-24
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast(THE EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADE BLOCKS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise:(10 NATIONS) and another shall rise after them;(#11 SPAIN) and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.(BE HEAD OF 3 KINGS OR NATIONS).

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come (ROMANS IN AD 70) shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMANS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.
27 And he( EU ROMAN, JEWISH DICTATOR) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:( 7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,( 3 1/2 YRS) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

EU envoy to US flaunts new powers
ANDREW RETTMAN Today AUG 11,10 @ 13:31 CET

The EU's new ambassador to the US, Joao Vale de Almeida, has underlined the new powers conferred on EU envoys by the Lisbon Treaty while taking up his post in Washington.In a series of interviews to US-based press on Tuesday (10 August), the ambassador noted that he is empowered to speak on behalf of EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy, EU Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso and EU member states.I do not wish or will impose myself on the member states' ambassadors ... Where we have a common position, I am the one leading the show. Bilateral matters are the mandate of the 27 [EU member state] ambassadors, he told the Washington Post. In this area code, you call me,he added, on the apocryphal tale of former US secretary of state Henry Kissinger once asking whom he should telephone if he wants to speak to the EU.

I'm the first new type of ambassador for the European Union anywhere in the world, he told Agence France Presse. Our delegations now cover a wide spectrum of issues well beyond the economic dimension, trade dimension and regulatory dimension, to cover all policies in the union, including foreign policy and security policy.The EU is currently in the process of converting its 138 foreign missions into EU delegations empowered to speak on behalf of the whole union.In the past, the missions' main task was to implement EU projects and to channel information back and forth to EU institutions. The Belgian EU presidency aims to wrap up the conversion process by the end of the year, while EU foreign relations chief Catherine Ashton is in the coming weeks to name a first generation of 31 new EU heads and deputy heads of delegation in her European External Action Service.Mr Vale de Almeida told AFP that he will focus on Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and the Middle East peace process in the foreign policy area: On the foreign policy side, Iran is top of the list.

Transatlantic economic ties and the recovery from the global financial crisis will also lead his agenda, he added.In a formal letter adressed to US President Barack Obama, the EU ambassador downplayed the idea that China is becoming a more important partner for the US than the EU. The emergence of new powers has led to predictions that transatlantic relations will be less important in the future, but this view overlooks the enormous stock we have vested in one another,he wrote. Mr Vale de Almeida's appointment, decided in Brussels earlier this year, saw allegations of cronyism against the EU commission. Mr Barroso, a fellow Portuguese countryman of Mr Vale de Almeida, reportedly pushed through the nomination over Ms Ashton's head.EU diplomats at the time also complained the new ambassador - a former journalist who served as an EU commission press spokesman, an advisor to Mr Barroso and, briefly, as head of the commission's external relations department, but who has no diplomatic experience - is not up to the job.Meanwhile, EU countries remain less than comfortable with the new division of power under Lisbon.What you see in the big emerging countries and in the US, is that each [EU] country defends its privileged relationship. When you talk to the Chinese or to the Indians they say: Yes, we have this EU summit once a year. But for the rest of the time, each of your countries comes and says the EU is not important,a veteran EU diplomat told EUobserver in a recent interview.