LAND FOR PEACE (THE FUTURE 7 YEARS OF HELL ON EARTH)
JOEL 3:2
2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat, and will plead with them there for my people and for my heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations, and parted my land.
THE WEEK OF DANIEL 9:27 WE KNOW ITS 7 YRS
Heres the scripture 1 week = 7 yrs Genesis 29:27-29
27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.
28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.
29 And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.
DANIEL 11:21-23
21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24 He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time.
DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
JEREMIAH 6:14
14 They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.
JEREMIAH 8:11
11 For they have healed the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace.
1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.
Israel isolated ahead of UN vote on Palestinians
AP By JOSEF FEDERMAN - Associated Press | AP – SEPT 7,11
JERUSALEM (AP) — Rising tensions with some of its closest and most important allies have left Israel increasingly isolated ahead of a momentous vote on Palestinian independence at the United Nations.Troubles with Turkey, Egypt and even the U.S. are adding to Israel's headaches ahead of the vote, which is shaping up to be a global expression of discontent against the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Palestinians plan to ask the United Nations this month to recognize their independence in the West Bank, Gaza Strip and east Jerusalem — areas captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war — probably by embracing them as a nonmember observer state.The measure is expected to pass overwhelmingly in the U.N. General Assembly.
The assembly's decisions are not legally binding, so the vote will be largely symbolic. But the Palestinians hope the measure will increase the already considerable pressure on Israel to withdraw from occupied territories, and add leverage should peace talks resume. The Palestinians refuse to negotiate while Israel continues to expand Jewish settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
Ghassan Khatib, a spokesman for the Palestinian government in the West Bank, said Israeli isolation is playing right into Palestinian hands. We are seeing that result in increased support for us in the United Nations, he said.On Wednesday, China announced it would support the Palestinian bid. And a French Mideast envoy, Valerie Hoffenberg, said she had been fired after publicly arguing against the Palestinian initiative. France has not publicly said how it will vote, but her comments signaled that the government favors the Palestinians.The vote is seen by many not only as a message of sympathy with the Palestinians, but also a barometer of discontent with Israel's settlement policies. Some 500,000 Israelis now live in territories claimed by the Palestinians.There's no question that had Israel been seen as a country doing its utmost to promote peace, no such vote would be taking place, said Yossi Beilin, Israel's former deputy foreign minister.Beilin cited Netanyahu's refusal to extend a freeze on new settlement construction a year ago as the mother of all sins that put him at odds with the international community. The decision, made over the very public objections of President Barack Obama, caused a brief round of peace talks to collapse.Since then, relations with Obama have been further strained. In May, Netanyahu paid a tense visit to Washington, where he objected before cameras to Obama's call that the 1967 boundaries be the basis of a future agreement with the Palestinians. American officials privately express deep frustration with Netanyahu.
Even so, Washington has been trying to pressure the Palestinians to give up the U.N. bid, saying peace can only be achieved through negotiations.Closer to home, Israel has watched Egypt, perhaps its most critical regional ally, cool relations since the ouster of longtime President Hosni Mubarak in February. Mubarak was seen by many of his people as too sympathetic to Israel, negotiating an unpopular deal to supply it with natural gas, for example.Israel-Egypt relations took a hit last month when five Egyptian police were killed during a firefight between Israeli forces and fleeing militants. Egypt was outraged, and mass demonstrations against Israel erupted in Cairo. Israel later apologized. But there have been calls in Egypt to cancel the 30-year-old peace agreement with Israel — which is an absolutely critical element of Israel's regional strategy.Another key regional ally, Turkey, has greatly curbed diplomatic and trade ties with Israel following Israel's deadly raid on a protest flotilla that tried to breach the Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip last year. Nine Turks, one of them an American citizen, were killed in clashes with Israeli naval commandos.Israeli officials have tried to play down the tensions, saying that Israel has long faced hostility on the diplomatic stage. They also say that Israel has enjoyed some key victories recently, such as last week's U.N. report on the flotilla incident that defended its blockade of Gaza. Yet one official acknowledged the new challenges are a source of concern. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing sensitive internal discussions.Dore Gold, a former Israeli ambassador to the U.N. who is close to Netanyahu, said it is a mistake to judge Israel's international standing by recent events.He said Turkey's animosity toward Israel is part of a broader shift by the country's Islamist government that is troubling not just for the Jewish state but for many of Turkey's neighbors.And any anti-Israel resolution at the U.N. passes automatically, thanks to the dominance by developing nations that are sympathetic to the Palestinians, he said. It's conventional wisdom that if there was a resolution whose first clause was anti-Israel and whose second clause was that the earth was flat, it would pass,Gold said.Israeli opposition leader Tzipi Livni, however, accused Netanyahu of weakening the nation's interests. Israel's isolation is affecting its security and its economy,she told a conference Wednesday.
Report: Israel Offers PA to Postpone UN Bid for Negotiations-Kuwaiti daily reports the PA is considering Israeli offer to postpone the unilateral statehood bid and immediately begin negotiations.By Elad Benari First Publish: 9/8/2011, 1:16 AM
The Kuwaiti daily Al-Jarida has reported that the Palestinian Authority is considering an Israeli offer to postpone the unilateral statehood bid at the UN for at least one year and to immediately begin negotiations for a permanent peace agreement.According to the report, which was translated and presented on the website of the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) on Wednesday, the offer was made to the PA during secret negotiations which have been ongoing for several months in various Arab and European countries.According to the report in the Kuwaiti daily, the negotiations also included meetings between Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, in which they discussed the possibility of holding a formal meeting between Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Netanyahu promised the U.S. to return to negotiations if an agreement on scheduling was reached.The report stressed that Netanyahu shared the negotiation details with Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman and opposition leader Tzipi Livni.
Meanwhile, MEMRI also reported that a website close to Abbas’ Fatah party reported that Abbas advisor Nimer Hammad said that if Dennis Ross and David Hale, the U.S. envoys visiting the region, would make offers that meet the PA’s demands of halting Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria and recognizing a Palestinian state along the 1949 armistice lines, the PA would forgo an appeal to the UN.The report comes after on Wednesday, the United States formally asked Ramallah to drop its bid for recognition of a PA state based.The request was relayed to Abbas by Hale during a meeting in Ramallah, officials said. The meeting was also attended by Ross and by U.S. Consul-General in Jerusalem, Daniel Rubenstien.The report also seems to be in line with another report earlier this week which said that Abbas and Barak held a meeting in Amman on August 24.Abbas, who told reporters in Ramallah about the meeting, refused to specify the circumstances behind it and simply said the two discussed a number of issues.
US Formally Asks PA to Drop Statehood Bid-After months of implicit opposition to the PA statehood bid at the UN on September 20, the US has formally asked the PA to drop the move.By Gavriel Queenann First Publish: 9/7/2011, 8:43 PM
Unmoved by sharp criticism and media antics from Palestinian Authority officials the United States on Wednesday formally asked Ramallah to drop its bid for recognition of a PA state based on pre-1967 lines at the United Nations later this month.The request was relayed to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas by US envoy David Hale during a meeting in Ramallah, officials in Ramallah said. The meeting was attended by US envoy Dennis Ross and US Consul-General in Jerusalem, Daniel Rubenstien.The officials complained US envoys did not carry any new proposals for reviving the peace process and intimated the PA may go only to the UN General Assembly due to the threat of a US veto in the Security Council.We have been advised by some or our European and Arab friends not to go to the Security Council because we don't have a majority in favor of the plan and because of the US threat to use the veto,the official said. We are now studying submitting a request to the General Assembly to accept the state of Palestine as a full member. This is also an important step because it would give us access to numerous international bodies.Such a move would be largely symbolic and be aimed at building lawfare and propaganda momentum as UN membership requires Security Council approval.Hale told Abbas that Washington wants to see the Palestinians return to the negotiating table with Israel, Chief PLO negotiator Saeb Erekat said.
Erekat quoted the US envoy as saying that the Quartet members - the US, EU, UN and Russia - were preparing a new initiative for the establishment of a Palestinian state on the basis of the 1967 borders.Erekat quoted Abbas as saying during the meeting that the Palestinians would resume the peace talks with Israel only if it halted construction in the settlements and accepted the 1967 lines as the basis for a two-state solution.Israel did halt construction for 10-months in order to restart negotiations, during which time the PA abjectly refused to come to the negotiating table while continuing to add new preconditions as a means of avoiding direct talks.
According to Erekat, the PA is only planning to apply to the UN for membership of a Palestinian state on the pre-1967 lines, with east Jerusalem as its capital.Contrary to what is being said, we are not asking for independence or recognition of a Palestinian state,Erekat insisted.It's wrong to say that the Palestinian Authority is asking for independence. The independent state was declared more than 20 years ago. We are only asking that Palestine be admitted as a member of the UN.Erekat did not explain, if a Palestinian state was declared more than twenty years ago, how it is that the PA was only created in 1993 with the understanding it was empowered to negotiate for the creation of a state that did not yet exist.
Nor did he explain how the PA was not asking for recognition when in recent months recognition has been at the heart of Ramallah's lexicon with new press releases issued regularly about states newly recognizing a state of Palestine ahead of the UN bid.Erekat also dismissed claims that the statehood bid would affect the right of return for Palestinian refugees to their original villages inside Israel.Going to the UN won't cancel the right of return, he said.Recognition of a Palestinian state will pave the way for the state to enter international institutions and demand all our legitimate rights, including the right of return.But legal experts, UN officials, and the Jordanian government have warned that the so-called right of return very well could be undermined by a successful PA bid at the Security Council thereby undercutting one of its central ideological pillars.And as September 20 approaches Israel's security forces are ramping up for widespread violence expected to erupt in PA administered enclaves after the bid is made - indicating Israel regards the PA bid as anything but a good-faith gesture.As regards the Palestinian issue, Israeli vice premier Moshe Yaalon said Wednesday, no doubt they opted for a unilateral proclamation in order to sidestep negotiations. We are willing to sit down at the table and address not only territorial matters but also the recognition of a Palestinian state. I suggest reading the Arab press which places the September issue front and center.The unilateral proclamation poses a serious threat to the Palestinians as the US may cut off its aid and Israel might back out of the Oslo Agreement. It is my opinion that the September threat is an attempt to twist Israel's arm and gain concessions. We must be prepared for any case scenario. A proclamation at the UN does not change the reality – we have to be prepared for any contingency as we did in 2000,he added.
Begin Breaks Likud Ranks on INR Radio; Rejects PA State-INR interview: Minister Benny Begin rejects PA state, says Naqba Day events prove Arabs' true intent, says pr war can be won with truth.By Gavriel Queenann First Publish: 5/31/2011, 9:02 AM / Last Update: 5/31/2011, 11:10 AM
Minister without portfolio Benny Begin (Likud), in an Israel National News Radio interview on Monday, rejected the creation of an Arab state west of the Jordan River saying the right of the Jewish people to their ancestral homeland was 'obvious' and that such a state would become a haven of impunity for terror. Begin's remarks mark a stark departure from the two states for two people's vision endorsed by Israel's current Likud-run government.I think any second state of any nature, another sovereignty west of the Jordan River, especially when it comprises the PLO or Hamas, would negate or contradict two basic rights of the Jewish people and the citizens of Israel,Begin told Israel National News Radio's Josh Hasten. during an interview on the Israel Hasbara Hour.One is the right of the Jewish people to our homeland, and our right to our homeland does not stop exactly east of the 1949 armistice demarcation lines, also known as the Green Line.It has no historic significance whatsoever. It just marks a balance of military power back then, in 1948 or 1949, between [Israel's] local Arab neighbors and the newborn state of Israel in their attempt to smother the baby state in its cradle. Our right to our land – Including of course to the cradle of our history in Judea and Samaria – is obvious, Begin said.There is also the question of national security, and we have had some experience in the the last twenty years under the banner territory for peace... the actual events have been territory for terror. Every piece of land, every hectare, every acre, that was consigned to the PLO reign, became a haven of impunity for terrorism. And we should anticipate that once we transfer parts of our homeland to the PLO it will be, actually, an indirect transfer of land through the PLO to Hamas, and to Iran,Begin said.
Recent Events Prove Arab's True Intent
Begin cited the recent Fatah-Hamas unity treaty and Naqba unrest throughout Israel on May 15, which saw the infiltration of Northern Israel by over 100 Syrian radicals, along with riots throughout Judea and Samaria, as proof the Arab's have no intention of making peace with the Jewish state.I think in the last month people can see for themselves [what their intentions are] through the following events: the new agreement between the PLO and Hamas, who nobody doubts is openly bent on the destruction of the state of Israel, and then the May 15 marches on our borders marking the devastation or calamity, that they claim was inflicted upon them by the very establishment of the state of Israel on May 15, 1948,Begin explained.Their real aim is not a a two state solution, but a two-stage solution. In the sense that they push us to the pre-1967, actually 1949 lines, and then push more through terrorism and other forms of political pressure in order to dwarf us and to try to erase the state of Israel, the Jewish state, Begin said.They did not mark the date in June, Begin said referring to the 1967 Six Day War, sometimes called the June War, in which Israel liberated its eternal capitol and ancestral heartland. After all, the occupation so to speak of Judea and Samaria and Gaza started in June 1967. No, they mark the original May 15 date of the very birth of the Jewish state.
Israel's Hasbara Advantage
Begin conceded Israel starts at a public relations disadvantage due to the vastly greater sums the Arab world pours into its anti-Israel media efforts, but said Israel has a big advantage in its hasbara [public relations, ed.] war because it doesn't have to sell lies.It used to be Hasbara was translated propaganda,Begin explained. Now they call it public diplomacy, which is a little nicer. But years ago it was considered by Israelis to be propaganda [and therefore beneath them, ed.] One of the nice things about our propaganda is that we don't have to sell lies. We can suffice ourselves with telling people things as they are. We have to tell them the truth. And we have to ask them to judge. Because once they know the facts they will be able use moral judgment.[There was] a very important article written by Mahmoud Abbas, Abu Mazen, written on May 16 as an op-ed article in the New York Times... [readers] will read it and see easily for themselves what kind of narrative, or actually what kind of lies, the PLO tries to sell intelligent people in America and elsewhere. Its untenable, its unacceptable, and it takes things to such an extreme in such a manner that we can easily prove the narrative is totally false,Begin said.
Such articles will only help us, Begin said optimistically. I don't know if this would be efficient immediately It takes time, but people of good will, if they will stand up and work for truth – for morality – I think it would be a great help to the cause of real justice in our part of the world.
Op-Ed: Sept at UN: 3 Israeli Experts: Is Israel Prepared? Published: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 11:56 PM
3rd in a series: Arutz Sheva brings you the opinions of three respected and involved Israelis, translated from the popular Be’Sheva Hebrew weekly newspaper, on how Israel should deal with the Abbas demand for statehood in September.
Danny Dayan, head of Council of Judea and Samaria:A Golden Opportunity Missed:Israel has done some good political preparation for September (the PM made successful trips to several European countries, for example) as well as security planning (the IDF is rehearsing various scenarios), but the most crucial steps have not been taken: steps that would frighten the Arabs into giving up their plan.And most telling of all: Israel has not been wise enough to turn the crisis into an opportunity, although it has the ability to do so.Deterrent-wise, Israel has done nothing, except for saying a few hollow words that no one took seriously. Israel has an abundance of political leverage, as well as economic, defense, and settlement options that could stop the Arabs in their tracks.Not only has none of them been used, the opposite is true: the policy in the defense establishment is that this is the time to strengthen the PA financially so that it will keep on coordinating security with us.This is not the way to build a wall, said a sportscaster once, coining a new phrase, as Israel’s soccer team absorbed a rival team’s goal. This is not the way to prevent a unilateral Arab offensive against Israel, we have to tell our government, hoping it will come to its senses and act differently.The biggest shame of all is not turning this into a golden opportunity. The unilateral Arab step in the UN voids all former agreements with Israel.It has to be responded to with a strong, obvious unilateral move of our own: asserting Israeli sovereignty in Judea and Samaria, if not on its entirety, then on all the Jewish settlements and the open areas between them—what is known as Area C.The Arabs forced Israel into a political war. In this war, just as in military wars, Israel must win and not accept a tie, nor a respectable loss (i.e. a few dozen countries who abstain or vote nay in the UN, our Foreign Ministry’s current aspiration).Only asserting Israeli sovereignty on large portions of our homeland would achieve a victory. This is, therefore, a crisis that has been badly handled, a great opportunity that has been missed.
Dr. David Bukai, Department for the Study of the Middle East, Haifa University
Expose the Palestinian Bluff:There is no difference between the goals of Hamas, Al Qaeda and the PLO, the only differences are in methods and tactics. Abu Mazen is an anti-Semite, Holocaust denier, as extremist as Arafat was.All the moderates surrounding him are the same, clearly announcing that they do not recognize Israel as a Jewish state; that Israel must let the 7 (yes, 7) million refugees return to their homes; mainly because they do not believe in two states for two peoples, but rather in one large Palestinian state alongside a small dual-nationality, multi-cultural one that will quickly become part of the Palestinian state, as will Jordan.
Israel erred egregiously in strategic preparation. Since Abu Mazen does not talk about a Palestinian state with 1967 borders as a final goal, but only as a step on the road to erasing the Jewish state, Israel should have exposed that.Instead of expending so much effort in thwarting the idea of declaring a state, Israel should have exposed the extremist Palestinian goals, suggested that the world have the Palestinians sign that once they have a state with the 1967 borders, they will abandon all other goals for eliminating Israel: no more right of return to within Israel, cessation of terror and all forms of violence, cessation of incitement to anti-Semitic hatred.Abu Mazen and his friends could never accept these conditions ands the international arena would realize that this is not a desire for self-determination with which we are dealing, but a desire to destroy the state of Israel.All the Palestinian groups are not prepared to, are not able to and do not want to agree to a country with 1967 borders. Arafat could not force this on them, and Abu Mazen, just as extreme but weaker, certainly cannot and also doesn’t wish to.
Many people, in Israel as well, do not know his extremist personality and that the brilliant idea of declaring a state in September is just a means to continue his plan of annihilation. Exposing his bluff and proving what he is like are the biggest challenge for Israel, but Israel is failing to meet it. The never ending need to thwart terror keeps Israel from being able to deal with the real challenge: the Palestinian aspiration to destroy israel through delegitimizing and dehumanizing. her internationally. The recognition of a Palestinian state is simply a means to advance the goal of eliminating Israel.
Gen. Amram Mitzna (Res.), former MK and contender for leadership of Israel’s Labor Party
The PA Has No Interest in Escalation:
Gen. Amram Mitzna (Res.), former MK and contender for leadership of Israel’s Labor Party.The IDF and the police force must be prepared for the possibility of riots, perhaps attempts to block roads and even march in the direction of some of the communities in Judea and Samaria (Yesha) and threaten them. The IDF must instruct the residents of Yesha on how to carry on with their lives within their communities and with respect to travel on the roads during this period.My feeling is that the PA has no interest in having an uncontrollable situation on its hands, just as they had no interest in having one on Naqba and Naqsa days. They understand that the IDF and the Jewish residents will not let such disturbances pass them by. Nevertheless, there is still a danger that the whole thing will get out of control, especially in the light of the ability nowadays to fire people up through social networks.In the military sphere: I am not familiar with the details, but I take it for granted that the IDF is suitably organized and that it has learned the lessons of previous events, that it is in contact with the PA and fairly well coordinated with them.In the international arena: the government could have prevented the process in the General Assembly, but today it is a bit late to do anything, although that does not mean there is no need to continue to persuade countries not to support the PA initiative. I regret to say that the handwriting is already on the wall and the General Assembly will support the PA move by a large majority.This is not an existential threat to Israel, at least not in the short term. However, it is another step towards delegitimization and the weakening of our international relations. I have no doubt that the skewed minds of the world will find us new challenges to meet, such as far out legal claims, sending ambassadors to the Palestinians and the like.
WORLD GOVERNMENT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnq5cQMiAB8&feature=related
http://britanniaradio.blogspot.com/2009/07/we-are-already-under-global-government.html#links
DICK MORRIS-This truly creates a global economic system. From now on, don’t look to Washington for the rule making, look to Brussels.
LORD MONCKTON ON WORLD GOVERNMENT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHyMYEzRyf8&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUUcb36a_4I&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA0xEM1KwG4&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7o1S4m5mCw&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieC7HYC5cto&feature=player_embedded
EPHESIANS 6:10-13
10 Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.
11 Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil.
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities,(DEMONIC ANGELS IN HIGH PLACES) against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.(SPIRTIUAL DEMONIC PERSONS)
13 Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.
LUKE 4:5-7(BECAUSE SATAN OFFERS WORLD POWER, WORLD ORDERERS HAVE ACCEPTED SATANS GIFT)
5 And the devil, taking him (JESUS) up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.
6 And the devil said unto him, All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it.
7 If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.
DANIEL 7:23-25
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth, which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.
25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.
DANIEL 12:4,1
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.
1 And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
REVELATION 13:1-3,7,8,12,16-18
1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy.
2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.
3 And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.
7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations.
8 And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.
12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.
16 And he causeth all,(WORLD SOCIALISM) both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
REVELATION 17:3,7,9-10,12,18
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
7 And the angel said unto me, Wherefore didst thou marvel? I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.
10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth.
We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.James Paul Warburg appearing before the Senate on 7th February 1950
Like a famous WWII Belgian General,Paul Henry Spock said in 1957:We need no commission, we have already too many. What we need is a man who is great enough to be able to keep all the people in subjection to himself and to lift us out of the economic bog into which we threaten to sink. Send us such a man. Be he a god or a devil, we will accept him.And today, sadly, the world is indeed ready for such a man.
http://www.infowars.com/plan-for-european-economic-government-was-brainchild-of-nazis/
Plan For European Economic Government Was Brainchild Of Nazis-Economic Terrorists Seek United States of Europe Paul Joseph Watson Infowars.com Wednesday, September 7, 2011
European globalists are committing another act of economic terrorism by exploiting the euro debt crisis in a bid to create a United States of Europe, with European Council president Herman van Rompuy announcing he is ready to spearhead the group, a move that frighteningly parallels plans by top Nazis, may of whom went on to found the EU, and their mission to build a continent-wide economic government.EU leaders are fearmongering over the consequences of member states abandoning the single currency, warning that a euro collapse would lead to martial law and even civil war.
Their solution is to hand themselves even more power to create a common economic policy that all member states would be forced to follow at the expense of their national sovereignty, a de facto financial government for the whole of Europe.
European Council president Herman van Rompuy said yesterday that he was ready to run for a second term as European Union president, to lead a United States of Europe, reports the Irish Independent.Mr Van Rompuy has announced he is willing to take on the unfinished eurozone debt crisis with new powers setting an economic government in Brussels.Simultaneously, British Prime Minister David Cameron last night said that Britain must let eurozone countries move towards a United States of Europe with a common economic policy, reports the Daily Mail.The Prime Minister admitted he was not sure whether Germany and other countries had the political will to prevent a break-up of the single currency, but insisted they must be allowed to try – even if that meant closer integration.The move to exploit the debt crisis in order to completely eviscerate the economic sovereignty of every EU member by forming a central economic planning committee, a United States of Europe, to which all countries are beholden, is not merely an act of economic terrorism, it’s a chilling throwback to identical proposals that were the brainchild of top Nazis.Plans to create a federal European economic government in the name of mandating fiscal responsibility and avoiding a repeat of the turmoil in Greece chillingly mirror blueprints concocted in the 1940’s as a means of preserving fascist power at the end of world war two by men who were responsible for founding the EU in the first place.
As we have exhaustively documented, the European Common Market, the precursor to the European Union, was a brainchild of top Nazis in the 1940’s who wanted to preserve fascist power in the event of defeat in world war two.US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128, also known as The Red House Report, details how top Nazis secretly met at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944 and, knowing Germany was on the brink of military defeat, conspired to create a Fourth Reich – a pan-European economic empire based around a European common market, precisely what the new Economic government proposal backed by the likes of Cameron and van Rompuy calls for.Wealthy Nazi industrialists like Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, as well as front companies like BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, set about the task of building a new pan-European business empire. According to historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave laborers, For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler….The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.
The foundations for the EU and ultimately the Euro single currency were laid by the secretive Bilderberg Group in the mid-1950’s. Bilderberg’s own leaked documents prove that the agenda to create a European common market and a single currency were formulated by Bilderberg in 1955. One of the group’s principle founders was H. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, a former Nazi SS officer.But the ideological framework for the European Union goes back even further, to the 1940’s when top Nazi economists and academics outlined the plan for a single European economic community, an agenda that was duly followed after the end of the second world war.In his 1940 book The European Community, Nazi Economics Minister and war criminal Walther Funk wrote about the need to create a Central European Union and European Economic Area and for fixed exchange rates, stating No nation in Europe can achieve on its own the highest level of economic freedom which is compatible with all social requirements…The formation of very large economic areas follows a natural law of development….interstate agreements in Europe will control [economic forces generally]…There must be a readiness to subordinate one’s own interests in certain cases to those of [the EC].How different is Funk’s call for governments to subordinate their economic interests to those of Europe compared with Jose Manuel Barroso’s insistence that EU member states should be forced to institute structural reforms under pain of financial sanctions? The similarity is frightening.Funk’s co-authors echoed his sentiments. Nazi academic Heinrich Hunke wrote, Classic national economy..is dead…community of fate which is the European economy…fate and extent of European co-operation depends on a new unity economic plan.A new unity economic plan,this is precisely what Cameron and Van Rompuy are proposing – centralized financial control over the economies of Europe ruled by Brussels.Fellow Nazi Gustav Koenig observed, We have a real European Community task before us…I am convinced that this Community effort will last beyond the end of the war.
In 1940, Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels ordered the creation of the large-scale economic unification of Europe,believing that in fifty years’ time [people would] no longer think in terms of countries.Just 53 years later, the European Union in its current form was established.So you have one of Hitler’s most loyal Nazi allies calling for Economic unification of Europe, and now former German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer is demanding the establishment of a financial oversight body with the teeth to assert control over the finances of member states.
Even on the face of it, the fact that the EU, which began as a free trade area, is now seeking to have its unelected members directly control national economies, is completely dictatorial, authoritarian, and represents the anti-thesis of any notion of democracy or representation of the people of Europe. Add the fact that the exact same agenda was pursued by one of the most notoriously criminal and barbaric regimes in history and surely alarm bells should be ringing? Other top Nazis who called for the creation of a pan-European federal economic superstate include Ribbentrop, Quisling and Seyss-Inquart, who spoke of The new Europe of solidarity and co-operation among all its people… will find…rapidly increasing prosperity once national economic boundaries are removed.Most of the individuals who hold the reigns of power in the European Union are not Nazis, indeed, they probably believe themselves to be fair-minded liberals working for the greater good. However, the European Union by its very nature is totalitarian, because it seeks to remove power from national governments accountable to their electorate and centralize it into the hands of supra-national entities that are accountable to nobody but themselves. It also seeks to remove the right of free speech for anyone in a position of influence who criticizes this agenda.The fact that the EU was a brainchild of top Nazi economists and industrialists, formulated as a means of preserving dictatorial power and then implemented by former Nazi working under the auspices of the Bilderberg Group in 1955, proves that the entire European Union system is poisoned with a legacy and a raison d’être of totalitarianism.The additional knowledge that the European Union is now pursuing identical economic policies to those voiced by top Nazis, several of whom went on to found the EU in its embryonic stages, is a chilling reminder of how fundamentally anti-democratic and fascist the EU is becoming as it swallows up more power from member states and appoints itself as the supreme dictator of an entire continent.The European Union will fight tooth and nail to protect the single currency from collapsing because, as top Bilderberger and Harvard professor Kenneth Rogoff made clear in a recent Financial Times piece, the future plan for a globalized currency system is wholly dependent on the survival of the Euro, which would almost certainly be destroyed if the Greeks or any other member state were to default and ditch the single currency.The euro experiment has also brought us to a crossroads in the whole international monetary system,wrote Rogoff. Will our grandchildren inherit a world with a huge number of national currencies, or a very small number of multi-country currencies?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue5qY8nyN9s&feature=player_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEQ1TCqJ7tQ&feature=related
Markets will drive a two-speed Europe, says Barroso
Today SEPT 7,11 @ 00:59 By Honor Mahony
European commission president Jose Manuel Barroso has said he believes the eurozone will integrate further with market demands now trumping past ideological debates.My assessment is that the European Union will go further into integration, namely around the eurozone, he told an audience on Tuesday (6 September) during a visit to Australia.He said that in the past debates about the future of Europe were political or even ideological with federalists on the one side and intergovernmentalists on the other.But now with markets calling for mechanisms for quickly dealing with the eurozone debt crisis, the fundamentals of the debate have been altered.Now, the markets are demanding more integration at least for the euro area. And this is new, said Barroso.The discussion is how far can we go now, do we need a new treaty to go further, what can we do to reinforce the governance of the eurozone, he said, becoming the latest in a series of high level EU officials to raise the spectre of yet another revision of the EU treaties.Barroso, former prime minister of Portugal one of the three bailed-out eurozone countries, also touched on one of the most significant questions thrown up by crisis – how to balance the demands of the market with the slower and messier democratic process.
Now [eurosceptics] understand that one of the issues that the markets are looking at is the capacity of the euro area to have quick answers because the markets are very fast and democratic procedures are always slower than the markets. And we have to understand this.This issue is at the core of a debate in paymaster Germany where parliamentarians are currently discussing what strings to attach in return for their agreement to make the eurozone bailout fund more flexible.German finance minister Wolfgang Schaueble has already indicated he is opposed to greatly increased parliamentary control, fearing it will make the fund too cumbersome, and therefore weak in eyes of the markets.The country’s constitutional court is also expected to highlight the importance of parliamentary democratic process on Wednesday when it gives its verdict on the legality of Germany’s involvement in saving the eurozone, including partaking in the first bailout of Greece last year.
Spectre of fresh EU treaty returns to haunt incomplete Europe 06.09.11 @ 17:31 By Leigh Phillips
It took nearly a decade of squabbling amongst EU states, a series of referendum disasters and a last-minute game of high-stakes brinksmanship from a stubborn Czech president, but the bloc finally managed to radically refashion the way it worked with the passage of the Lisbon Treaty in 2010.Treaty changes, a European finance minister and even a United States of Europe are on the table (ec.europa.eu)So exhausted were they by the struggle by the time the soap opera ended, European leaders then swore it would be very long indeed, perhaps a generation, before the EU treaties would be opened again.But now, in the last few days, as Europe’s economy and the single currency stand on the precipice, these same leaders have begun to eat their words.On Tuesday, German finance minister Wolfgang Schaeuble called for the second time in a week for changes to the treaties.Strengthening the eurozone's architecture ... may need profound treaty changes, he wrote in an opinion piece for the Financial Times.On Thursday, Schaeuble presented a plan to draft a new EU treaty to leading figures in his own party, the centre-right Christian Democratic Union, and its sister party, Bavaria’s Christian Social Union.According to populist daily Bild, the finance minister made the argument for a major shift in fiscal policy-making powers to Brussels, a move that would almost certainly necessitate a fresh opening of the treaties holding the bloc together.This must be done, he said,even though we know how difficult a treaty change will be.The outgoing head of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, for his part on Monday told participants at a Paris conference that the bloc required a European federal government with a federal finance minister.His successor, Italian central bank chief Mario Draghi added that strengthening the European bail-out fund must be completed,But it is not enough. Let's not forget that the crisis starts from the incompleteness of European construction.Targetting the multiplicity of fiscal policy approaches across the eurozone, he declared:We are discovering that we cannot live with this incompleteness any more.
Gerhard Schroeder, the former German chancellor on Sunday said Countries will have to give up some of their national sovereignty.His vision involves fiscal powers being given to the commission or a European finance minister under the control of the European Parliament as the ultimate authority.The commission will have to be turned into a government that is controlled, in parliamentary terms, by the European Parliament. That translates into a United States of Europe.A newly established think-tank, the Council on the Future of Europe, whose members include Schroeder, Tony Blair, former commission president Jacques Delors, former Spanish prime minister Felipe Gonzalez and economists Nouriel Roubini and Joseph Stiglitz on Monday issued a manifesto that called not just full fiscal union, but for parallel political union.It will be necessary to further lay out a vision of a federation that goes beyond a fiscal and economic mandate to include a common security, energy, climate, immigration and foreign policy as well as develop a common narrative about the future of the union and its place in the world,the document read.Nation states will need to share certain dimensions of sovereignty to a central European entity that would have the capacity to source revenue at the federal level in order to provide European-wide public goods.On Tuesday, responding to the calls for a fresh treaty, the European Commission said that deeper economic integration can happen under the existing treaties, but left the door open for a more radical restructuring of the bloc, should member states feel it is necessary.We have taken note of the comments from a number of European leaders. They have been calling for changes to be made to the treaties to reinforce economic governance,said commission spokesman Olivier Bailly.The current treaties already allow for an awful lot of possibilities to deepen economic integration. We have to make coordination better between European economies ... within the framework of the current treaties.If there were a need for a new legal basis for further economic governance, further integration, then that would be up to the member states to decide to make further changes to the treaty, he continued. But it’s hypothetical for us at the time being.It’s up to them to open the treaty again.
Speaking to EUobserver, Jannis Emmanouilidis, a senior policy analyst with the European Policy Centre, a Brussels-based EU specialist think-tank, said that moves in the direction of fiscal union and a new treaty are inevitable.It seems there is a growing consensus for treaty change, not just in the last few days or weeks, but this has been widening since the start of the crisis months ago, he said.There is increasing awareness of just how dangerous a situation Europe is in - the potential break-up of the euro and the costs that would go along with that. They see the need to get ahead of the curve. To do that they have to go substantially further toward fiscal union.The question is whether this can be done under the current treaty situation, and to be able to answer that, we need a lot more details about what is being proposed,he continued.As to how realistic, achievable all this is, we all know what happened with the Lisbon Treaty, and the problems of domestic resistance have not gone away.
Merkel outlines steps to stability union
Today SEPT 7,11 @ 17:40 By Honor Mahony
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has called for a stability union in which all member states behave in a fiscally responsible manner and miscreants can be brought before the EU’s highest court.Making a direct reference to the founding fathers of the EU, who had to rebuild a destroyed Germany, Merkel told her parliament on Wednesday (7 September) that our task is to show the way to reach a stability union.This would involve a possible EU treaty change to enforce budget control in euro states.If we say we want more Europe, then a treaty change cannot be a taboo,said the chancellor noting that under the current Lisbon Treaty, there is no mechanism obliging countries to adhere to rules underpinning the euro.The chancellor called it one of the EU’s paradoxes that countries can hauled before the European Court of Justice for breaching most EU laws but not when the euro rules are broken.Merkel also dismissed the much-touted idea of eurobonds – the mutualisation of eurozone debt – saying it would lead to a debt union.We have to tell people clearly that we cannot rid ourselves of today's problems - the excessive debts that have grown over decades - just like that, cue eurobonds and debt structuring, and then everything is ok again. No, this will be a long and difficult path, but one that is important for the future.The chancellor said the central question that has to be dealt with is the fact that although all 17 eurozone countries are completely bound to one another, each has control over their national budget.A solution to this thorny issue would lead to a more favourable climate for considering eurobonds, the chancellor indicated.
Solidarity alone is no good
She also dismissed solidarity as a stand-alone concept. We need solidarity and personal responsibility,she said.It is not those who immediately give in and help others who are right but rather those whose actions lead to a stability union.
Brushing all problems under the carpet and talking about solidarity will not lead us to a stability union.Her speech comes just weeks ahead of a Bundestag vote on extending the powers of the eurozone fund, so that it can buy bonds, something strongly criticised by some in her own party.She reminded deputies that the discussions are not taking place in a vacuum and a rejection would have consequences.
Netherlands: Indebted states must be made wards of the commission or leave euro Today SEPT 7,11 @ 17:37 By Leigh Phillips
The Dutch government has proposed that highly indebted states be put into guardianship, with spending decisions seized from the elected government and placed under the direct control of a European commissioner.Mark Rutte has radical ideas for the eurozone (NewsPhoto!)If a state is unwilling to surrender its sovereignty in this way, then it would be forced to exit the euro.Member states not willing to make themselves a ward, may choose to make use of the option to leave the eurozone, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said in a letter to the national parliament co-signed by the finance, economy and foreign ministers.To continue to be part of the monetary union, states should fully respect agreements.Under the proposals, seen by EUobserver, a special European commissioner would be appointed to oversee the budgets of euro-area countries.If a country repeatedly overspends in breach of EU stability pact rules, this commission overseer would be able to intervene directly in the running of the country, in a similar way to how a court intervenes in the running of a bankrupt firm put into receivership, according to officials familiar with the intention of the Dutch government.The commissioner would be given a ladder of intervention under which the level of control of the state would be steadily ratcheted up and applied this ward of the EU executive.
The first rung of the ladder would involve an outside auditor making adjustments to spending to bring down the level of the deficit.If this level of intervention is insufficient, binding measures would be imposed, or the commissioner could order a country to cut spending or raise taxes.The last rung of the ladder would see a country placed under guardianship. The auditor would then draft the budget of a country before sending it to the national parliament for approval.Such states, described in the paper as notorious sinners, would also lose their voting rights in the EU and the delivery of European structural funds would be dependent on compliance with the orders of the commissioner.The guardianship would be accompanied by intensive monitoring and verification of progress at a more detailed level under prior review by the commissioner.The Hague recogises the extreme nature of the proposals, but argues that such measures are necessary if the eurozone is to survive.
For the eurozone and the internal market in their present form to have a future as a stable currency union that underpins our prosperity, there needs to be a radical break with the persistent habit of soft touch approach to agreements.One Dutch official said of the paper: It is not like it would be a takeover of sovereignty, but things do need to get much tougher for countries.Asked whether voters would still consider themselves in a democracy under such extreme conditions, the official said: In that case, they need to take their own responsibility. If you want to be in the club, you have to play by the rules.The paper adds that for the proposal to be implemented, agreement with especially but not exclusively eurozone countries.
German court: Parliament must not be sidelined in future bail-outs Today SEPT 7,11 @ 12:13 By Leigh Phillips
Germany's highest court on Wednesday approved the country's participation in the Greek bailout and eurozone rescue fund, throwing out suits attempting to bring a halt to the country’s participation in the first, €110 billion bail-out of Greece and the eurozone’s €750 billion rescue fund.The court threw out the suits, but said that parliament needs greater oversight (Al Fed)But the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe also said that the German parliament must have more say when it comes to agreeing further bailout packages.There can be no automatic payments, said court president Andreas Vosskuhle.[The ruling] should not be mistakenly interpreted as a constitutional blank cheque authorising further rescue measures,he said.Parliamentary decisions about taxing and spending are a central element of democratic self government under the constitution, he added in his ruling.As representatives of the people, the elected members of parliament thus also need to remain in control over elementary budgetary decisions.The ruling was in line with most expectations. Few legal experts believed that the court would side with the team of eurosceptics, led by economist Joachim Starbatty, on the substance of their suit that European bail-outs have been unconstitutional.Most did however predict that the court would insist that similar future decisions would require the authorisation of the Bundestag, a move that is likely to throw sand in the wheels of Europe’s attempts to react to market pressures rapidly without having to wait for the slow wheels of parliamentary processes to turn.German chancellor Angela Merkel welcomed the ruling saying it confirmed her government's European policies.The Federal Constitutional Court said personal responsibility and solidarity, naturally with the absolute approval of the parliament, is the way,she said.
The European Commission said it had taken note with satisfaction of the court's ruling adding that the decision had an important bearing on the capacity of the eurozone to surmount the debt crisis.Responding to the ruling, Jannis Emmanouilidis, an EU institutional expert with the European Policy Centre think-tank, said: The Karlsruhe verdict does allow the EU to move on, especially since it is coupled with an increasing commitment in Berlin to a long-term solution of the crisis.The Court's decision will allow the rescue programmes to go ahead and provide the grounds for implementing the already- adopted instruments and measures aiming to enhance economic governance,he continued.But the most significant development in recent weeks and months is the growing realisation that all this will not be enough: either the euro zone moves towards a fully-functioning Economic and Monetary Union or one crisis will follow the other until maintaining the common currency becomes untenable.
