Heres the scripture 1 week = 7 yrs Genesis 29:27-29
27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.
28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.
29 And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.
DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he ( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant (PEACE TREATY) with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
ISAIAH 33:8
8 The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant,(7 YR TREATY) he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man.(THE WORLD LEADER-WAR MONGER CALLS HIMSELF GOD)
ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.
10 REASONS AGAINST 2 STATES - ON TAMAR YONAH
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Radio/Player.aspx#0#4548#1
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Radio/News.aspx/4548
The Two State Solution = The Final Solution.
Waiting
until his second term, Barack Obama has finally decided to visit Israel
in his official presidential capacity, beginning on March 20th. Obama
will also be spending several hours in Ramallah to meet with Palestinian
leader Mahmoud Abbas. Freed by his re-election from domestic political
constraints, Obama can be expected to vigorously renew his call for
Israel to retreat back to the pre-June 1967 lines with minor land swaps
and to continue to refer to “East Jerusalem” as the capital of the new
Palestinian state. He hasn’t asked the Palestinians to give up their
insistence on the so-called “right of return,” which would send
potentially millions of Palestinian refugees back to live within the
land of pre-June 1967 Israel and effectively destroy its Jewish
identity. Don’t expect him to do so on this trip.Obama will be facing off with a politically weakened Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, who is struggling to put together a governing
coalition and may have to partner with centrists willing to make more
concessions to reach an agreement with the Palestinians for a two state
solution.For example, Prime Minister Netanyahu has entered into an alliance
with the Hatnua party and its chair Tzipi Livni, a strong proponent of a
negotiated two state solution who has reportedly been offered a leading
role in the negotiations. “We need to say ‘Yes’ from time to time too,”
Livni said back in 2010 when referring to Netanyahu’s refusal to extend
the settlement freeze as Obama had then demanded.There is also the centrist Yesh Atid party, led by former television
journalist Yair Lapid, which finished second, with 19 seats, and could
join a Netanyahu-led coalition if certain demands are met. Although he
ran largely on economic issues and on a platform countering the
influence of the ultra-orthodox in Israel’s political affairs, Lapid
also said that he will demand a resumption of negotiations between
Israel and the Palestinian Authority.However, Obama recognizes that Netanyahu will continue to be
pressured from the Israeli right as well, including from his orthodox
party allies and from Jewish Home leader Naftali Bennett, who is
adamantly opposed to giving up any West Bank land to the Palestinians.Thus, Obama will be seeking to leverage Israel’s dependence on the
United States for maintaining its qualitative military advantage in the
region and for assistance in neutralizing Iran’s potential nuclear
threat in order to tilt Netanyahu decisively towards the centrists’
position on negotiations with the Palestinians and a freeze on
settlements.According to an unconfirmed report by World Tribune, quoting unnamed
Israeli sources, Obama wants Prime Minister Netanyahu to present him
with a detailed Israeli plan for withdrawal from the West Bank so that a
Palestinian state can be established there as early as 2014.
“Obama has made it clear to Netanyahu that his visit is not about photo-ops, but the business of Iran and a Palestinian state,” a source was quoted as saying in the World Tribune report. “The implication is that if Israel won’t give him something he can work with, then he’ll act on his own.”Whether or not this report turns out to be true, a key argument Obama can be expected to make to Netanyahu is that Abbas represents Israel’s last chance at making peace with a “moderate” Palestinian leader. Failure to seize this opportunity now, so the argument goes, will further enhance Hamas’s reputation at the expense of Abbas and the Palestinian Authority, and will feed the fires of a third intifada already at risk of being sparked by the death of a Palestinian prisoner and the sickened condition of Palestinian hunger strikers in Israel’s custody. Abbas’s only chance of survival is to play the same kind of extortionist game that Hamas is so adept at playing, which is to bargain for more concessions from Israel in return for a promise to keep violence against Israelis from getting out of hand. Obama may well end up as the enabler of this strategy during his visit to Israel and the West Bank.Will Obama offer his own plan on reinforcing the faltering security apparatus of the Palestinian Authority during the period of resumed negotiations and suggest replacing it with some sort of international military presence as part of the final peace settlement? Obama has a blueprint to turn to if he is so inclined, co-authored by his new Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel. This 2009 report recommended the two state solution boundaries embraced by Obama, enforced by a “U.S.-led multinational force” which would be “under a UN mandate” and “feature American leadership of a NATO force supplemented by Jordanians, Egyptians and Israelis.” Jerusalem would have “a special security and administrative regime of its own.” A NATO researcher estimated that about 60,000 US/NATO troops and about 160 billion dollars over 10 years would be required to carry out this plan.President Obama has another card to play in pushing Netanyahu towards making the concessions required to bring the Palestinians back to the negotiating table. He can play on the emotionalism in Israel surrounding the life sentence of Jonathan Pollard, a former Navy intelligence officer who once had dual U.S. and Israeli citizenships and pled guilty to passing classified information to Israel. Pollard has been in prison since 1987. Under normal circumstances, he will be eligible for parole, and may be released, on November 21, 2015. Obama could use his clemency powers and cite humanitarian health reasons for considering an earlier release, if the price is right.“The time has long since come for Jonathan to go free,” Netanyahu said recently. “This issue will come up during President Obama’s visit. It has already been raised countless times by myself and others, and the time has come for him to go free.”Obama may listen to Netanyahu’s plea this time, believing that the promise of a prompt release of Pollard in exchange for a moratorium on settlements and the release of more Palestinian prisoners, including the hunger strikers, may be enough to jump start resumed negotiations with the Palestine Authority, forestall at least temporarily a third intifada and enhance Abbas’s legitimacy vis-à-vis his Hamas rivals.The Iranian nuclear threat is also certain to come up during the two leaders’ discussions, with Obama saying he needs more time to see whether the current negotiations with Iran and the sanctions will bear fruit and Netanyahu trying to convince Obama that time is rapidly running out to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear arms capability. Whether there is any new intelligence to be shared by the two leaders, or whether they will agree on a timetable for possible coordinated military action if all other measures fail, is anyone’s guess.
At least, after visiting other countries in the Middle East region while skipping Israel during his first term, President Obama is finally going to Israel. Expect him to pay his public respects to the victims of the Holocaust and repeat Vice President Joe Biden’s declaration to AIPAC on Monday of “our deep commitment to the security of the state of Israel.” It is what Obama will say to Netanyahu in private, and what he may threaten to do if Netanyahu does not heed Obama’s advice on concessions to the Palestinians, that remains very worrisome.
27 Fulfil her week, and we will give thee this also for the service which thou shalt serve with me yet seven other years.
28 And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.
29 And Laban gave to Rachel his daughter Bilhah his handmaid to be her maid.
DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he ( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant (PEACE TREATY) with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
1 THESSALONIANS 5:3
3 For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.
ISAIAH 33:8
8 The highways lie waste, the wayfaring man ceaseth: he hath broken the covenant,(7 YR TREATY) he hath despised the cities, he regardeth no man.(THE WORLD LEADER-WAR MONGER CALLS HIMSELF GOD)
ISAIAH 28:14-19 (THIS IS THE 7 YR TREATY COVENANT OF DANIEL 9:27)
14 Wherefore hear the word of the LORD, ye scornful men, that rule this people which is in Jerusalem.
15 Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
16 Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD, Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make haste.
17 Judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place.
18 And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
19 From the time that it goeth forth it shall take you: for morning by morning shall it pass over, by day and by night: and it shall be a vexation only to understand the report.
10 REASONS AGAINST 2 STATES - ON TAMAR YONAH
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Radio/Player.aspx#0#4548#1
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Radio/News.aspx/4548
The Two State Solution = The Final Solution.
Ezra Ridgley, author of the book, 'Judea & Samaria:
The Land of G-d', joins Tamar and explains several reasons why it would
not only be dangerous, but also sacrilegious, to give away land to form
yet another Arab state! Read His list below and pass it on!
Ten Reasons Against a Two State Solution
1) Security === 300 million Arabs- 9 miles wide. Rope around the neck!
2) Desecration of G-ds name.=== Torch bearers of Hashem.
3) Destruction of the Jewish identity.=== 3,500 years of
Brit Mila (circumcision) and 2,000 years of prayer turned into an act of
vanity, This is only theoretical, not actual. G-d is faithful!
4) Legally it is our land. === Mandate For Palestine, Levy Report
5) Historically it is our land===Since the days of Joshua
no independent people have lived in the land as an independent nation.
Only the Jewish people. Census by British Embassy in 1864 found that
Jerusalem was 80% Jewish. British began expulsion in 1935 then Jordan in
1948
6) Religiously speaking it is our land. === Received by a
covenant with G-d. ( G-d to Abraham…”To Your descendants will I give
this land” Also it was a great Hebrew nation dwelling in this land that
brought faith in G-d to the world. How can they now say it doesn't
belong to them.
7) Morally speaking===They have no right to it because they have tried to acquire it though the shedding of innocent blood.
8) Tikun Olam depends on it. === No restoration to the
world less Israel first is restored. There for the building up of Judea
and Samaria should be a project of the Jews of the whole world and it is
in the interest of the whole world to contribute to this undertaking.
“My House is a House of prayer for all nations” If they have a stake in
it they certainly can help.
9) Land for future generations of Jews. Where will we live. Arabs have over 99% of middle east lands.
10) A sin against those who perished in the holocaust. It
was Arab violence in pre-state years that caused the British to renege
on the legally bind obligation to give us this land. 2-3 million Jews
could have been saved. How could we give this land to the very people
who contributed to their death. It would be like trampling on the blood
of those Jews of blessed memory who perished in the holocaust. Who could
we give their land to those who contributed to their death.
Obama to Demand Israel Withdrawal from Judea & Samaria?
March 7, 2013 By Comments (7)
Waiting
until his second term, Barack Obama has finally decided to visit Israel
in his official presidential capacity, beginning on March 20th. Obama
will also be spending several hours in Ramallah to meet with Palestinian
leader Mahmoud Abbas. Freed by his re-election from domestic political
constraints, Obama can be expected to vigorously renew his call for
Israel to retreat back to the pre-June 1967 lines with minor land swaps
and to continue to refer to “East Jerusalem” as the capital of the new
Palestinian state. He hasn’t asked the Palestinians to give up their
insistence on the so-called “right of return,” which would send
potentially millions of Palestinian refugees back to live within the
land of pre-June 1967 Israel and effectively destroy its Jewish
identity. Don’t expect him to do so on this trip.Obama will be facing off with a politically weakened Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, who is struggling to put together a governing
coalition and may have to partner with centrists willing to make more
concessions to reach an agreement with the Palestinians for a two state
solution.For example, Prime Minister Netanyahu has entered into an alliance
with the Hatnua party and its chair Tzipi Livni, a strong proponent of a
negotiated two state solution who has reportedly been offered a leading
role in the negotiations. “We need to say ‘Yes’ from time to time too,”
Livni said back in 2010 when referring to Netanyahu’s refusal to extend
the settlement freeze as Obama had then demanded.There is also the centrist Yesh Atid party, led by former television
journalist Yair Lapid, which finished second, with 19 seats, and could
join a Netanyahu-led coalition if certain demands are met. Although he
ran largely on economic issues and on a platform countering the
influence of the ultra-orthodox in Israel’s political affairs, Lapid
also said that he will demand a resumption of negotiations between
Israel and the Palestinian Authority.However, Obama recognizes that Netanyahu will continue to be
pressured from the Israeli right as well, including from his orthodox
party allies and from Jewish Home leader Naftali Bennett, who is
adamantly opposed to giving up any West Bank land to the Palestinians.Thus, Obama will be seeking to leverage Israel’s dependence on the
United States for maintaining its qualitative military advantage in the
region and for assistance in neutralizing Iran’s potential nuclear
threat in order to tilt Netanyahu decisively towards the centrists’
position on negotiations with the Palestinians and a freeze on
settlements.According to an unconfirmed report by World Tribune, quoting unnamed
Israeli sources, Obama wants Prime Minister Netanyahu to present him
with a detailed Israeli plan for withdrawal from the West Bank so that a
Palestinian state can be established there as early as 2014.
“Obama has made it clear to Netanyahu that his visit is not about photo-ops, but the business of Iran and a Palestinian state,” a source was quoted as saying in the World Tribune report. “The implication is that if Israel won’t give him something he can work with, then he’ll act on his own.”Whether or not this report turns out to be true, a key argument Obama can be expected to make to Netanyahu is that Abbas represents Israel’s last chance at making peace with a “moderate” Palestinian leader. Failure to seize this opportunity now, so the argument goes, will further enhance Hamas’s reputation at the expense of Abbas and the Palestinian Authority, and will feed the fires of a third intifada already at risk of being sparked by the death of a Palestinian prisoner and the sickened condition of Palestinian hunger strikers in Israel’s custody. Abbas’s only chance of survival is to play the same kind of extortionist game that Hamas is so adept at playing, which is to bargain for more concessions from Israel in return for a promise to keep violence against Israelis from getting out of hand. Obama may well end up as the enabler of this strategy during his visit to Israel and the West Bank.Will Obama offer his own plan on reinforcing the faltering security apparatus of the Palestinian Authority during the period of resumed negotiations and suggest replacing it with some sort of international military presence as part of the final peace settlement? Obama has a blueprint to turn to if he is so inclined, co-authored by his new Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel. This 2009 report recommended the two state solution boundaries embraced by Obama, enforced by a “U.S.-led multinational force” which would be “under a UN mandate” and “feature American leadership of a NATO force supplemented by Jordanians, Egyptians and Israelis.” Jerusalem would have “a special security and administrative regime of its own.” A NATO researcher estimated that about 60,000 US/NATO troops and about 160 billion dollars over 10 years would be required to carry out this plan.President Obama has another card to play in pushing Netanyahu towards making the concessions required to bring the Palestinians back to the negotiating table. He can play on the emotionalism in Israel surrounding the life sentence of Jonathan Pollard, a former Navy intelligence officer who once had dual U.S. and Israeli citizenships and pled guilty to passing classified information to Israel. Pollard has been in prison since 1987. Under normal circumstances, he will be eligible for parole, and may be released, on November 21, 2015. Obama could use his clemency powers and cite humanitarian health reasons for considering an earlier release, if the price is right.“The time has long since come for Jonathan to go free,” Netanyahu said recently. “This issue will come up during President Obama’s visit. It has already been raised countless times by myself and others, and the time has come for him to go free.”Obama may listen to Netanyahu’s plea this time, believing that the promise of a prompt release of Pollard in exchange for a moratorium on settlements and the release of more Palestinian prisoners, including the hunger strikers, may be enough to jump start resumed negotiations with the Palestine Authority, forestall at least temporarily a third intifada and enhance Abbas’s legitimacy vis-à-vis his Hamas rivals.The Iranian nuclear threat is also certain to come up during the two leaders’ discussions, with Obama saying he needs more time to see whether the current negotiations with Iran and the sanctions will bear fruit and Netanyahu trying to convince Obama that time is rapidly running out to prevent Iran from achieving nuclear arms capability. Whether there is any new intelligence to be shared by the two leaders, or whether they will agree on a timetable for possible coordinated military action if all other measures fail, is anyone’s guess.
At least, after visiting other countries in the Middle East region while skipping Israel during his first term, President Obama is finally going to Israel. Expect him to pay his public respects to the victims of the Holocaust and repeat Vice President Joe Biden’s declaration to AIPAC on Monday of “our deep commitment to the security of the state of Israel.” It is what Obama will say to Netanyahu in private, and what he may threaten to do if Netanyahu does not heed Obama’s advice on concessions to the Palestinians, that remains very worrisome.
