GODS HAND-1/2 OF A PERCENT OF EARTHS POPULATION ISRAELIS WIN 25% NOBEL AWARDS

DANIEL 7:23-25
23 Thus he said, The fourth beast (EU,REVIVED ROME) shall be the fourth kingdom upon earth,(7TH WORLD EMPIRE) which shall be diverse from all kingdoms, and shall devour the whole earth, and shall tread it down, and break it in pieces.(TRADING BLOCKS-10 WORLD REGIONS/TRADE BLOCS)
24 And the ten horns out of this kingdom are ten kings(10 NATIONS-10 WORLD DIVISION WORLD GOVERNMENT) that shall arise: and another shall rise after them; and he shall be diverse from the first, and he shall subdue three kings.(TAKE OVER 3 WORLD REGIONS)

DANIEL 9:26-27
26 And after threescore and two weeks(62X7=434 YEARS+7X7=49 YEARS=TOTAL OF 69 WEEKS OR 483 YRS) shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary;(ROMAN LEADERS DESTROYED THE 2ND TEMPLE) and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.(THERE HAS TO BE 70 WEEKS OR 490 YRS TO FUFILL THE VISION AND PROPHECY OF DAN 9:24).(THE NEXT VERSE IS THAT 7 YR WEEK OR (70TH FINAL WEEK).
27 And he ( THE ROMAN,EU PRESIDENT) shall confirm the covenant (PEACE TREATY) with many for one week:(1X7=7 YEARS) and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease,(3 1/2 yrs in TEMPLE ANIMAL SACRIFICES STOPPED) and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

REVELATION 13:11-12,16
11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth;(FALSE VATICAN POPE) and he had two horns like a lamb,(JESUS IS THE LAMB OF GOD) and he spake as a dragon.(HES SATANICALLY INSPIRED,HES A CHRISTIAN DEFECTOR FROM THE FAITH)
12 And he (FALSE RELIGIOUS LEADER) exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him,(WORLD DICTATOR) and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast,
16 And he(FALSE POPE) causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:(CHIP IMPLANT) (THE EUROPEAN PRESIDENT AND THE FALSE RELIGIOUS LEADER WORK HAND IN GLOVE IN CLOSENESS)

REVELATION 17:1-5,9
1 And there came one of the seven angels which had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication,(VATICAN IN POLITICS) and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
4 And the woman (FALSE CHURCH) was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour,(VATICAN COLOURS)(ANOTHER REASON WE KNOW THE FALSE POPE COMES FROM THE VATICAN) and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth.(THE VATICAN IS BUILT ON 7 HILLS OR MOUNTAINS)

YOU CAN LOOK FOR THE VATICAN TO GET INVOLVED IN THE PEACE PROCESS.BY THE BIBLE THE FALSE RELIGIOUS LEADER AND THE EUROPEAN UNION PRESIDENT WILL BE WORKING CLOSELY TOGETHER IN THE ISRAELI AFFAIRS.AND BETWEEN THEM THEY GUARENTEE ISRAELS SECURITY FOR A 7 YEAR PEACE TREATY. 

Pope Francis: I’ll come to Israel

In meeting with Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein, leader of world’s Catholics promises to visit, doesn’t say when

By Haviv Rettig Gur and Lazar Berman October 9, 2013, 3:11 pm 0-The Times of Israel

Pope Francis told Knesset Speaker Yuli Edelstein (Likud) he would visit Israel, but did not specify a date.

Edelstein was on an official visit to Italy and the Vatican Wednesday.He met Pope Francis Wednesday afternoon, and invited him to Israel and to a visit to the Knesset.Francis replied emphatically, “I’ll come! I’ll come!”Edelstein also asked the pope to help combat anti-Semitism.“There is still anti-Semitism in the world,” Edelstein said. “I ask you to use your influence to combat it.”Pope Francis had indicated in July he would visit Israel in 2014 to mark the 50th anniversary of Pope Paul VI’s visit to Jerusalem in 1964, which took place before the Vatican recognized the State of Israel.“The government of Israel granted me a unique opportunity to come to Jerusalem,” Francis said at the time.The Argentinian-born pontiff made the comments on his papal aircraft flying back to the Vatican from Brazil after his first trip abroad since his election in March. He told the assembled reporters that Israel invited him to visit to mark the anniversary, and if he did make the trip, he would visit the Palestinian Authority as well.The future visit would mark Francis’s second to the Holy Land. He visited in 1973, arriving just as the Yom Kippur War broke out. As The Times of Israel revealed in April, Jorge Mario Bergoglio (as he was then) spent six days confined to his Jerusalem hotel, studying the Letters of Saint Paul to the Corinthians.President Shimon Peres first invited Francis to Israel immediately after his election, calling on him to visit as a spiritual, not a political, leader.“The sooner you visit the better, as in these days a new opportunity is being created for peace and your arrival could contribute significantly to increasing the trust and belief in peace,” Peres said.Francis would try to find time to come to Israel “in the near future,” the President’s Office said in July.Both of the pontiff’s immediate predecessors visited Israel — Benedict XVI in 2009 and John Paul II in 2000.

Make Barghouti your deputy, Fatah leaders urge Abbas

PA chief is pressed to appoint convicted murderer as vice president in bid to expedite his release from Israeli jail

By Avi Issacharoff October 9, 2013, 12:39 pm 3-The Times of Israel

Several senior Fatah party officials urged Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to appoint former Fatah strongman Marwan Barghouti — who is serving five life sentences for murder in an Israeli prison — as his vice president, The Times of Israel has learned. Such a move would aim to expedite Barghouti’s release and line him up to be Abbas’s eventual successor.The issue of succession — Abbas is 78 years old — was raised at the end of September during a meeting in Ramallah of Fatah’s Revolutionary Council and the party’s Central Committee, the two most influential bodies in the hierarchy of Fatah, Abbas’s dominant faction of the PLO.At the meeting, committee member Tawfiq Tirawi, an adviser to Abbas, took the floor to propose that Abbas appoint a vice president, and recommended Fatah Tanzim leader Barghouti (who was once a political rival of Tirawi’s) as the man for the job. Tirawi argued that Barghouti’s appointment would pave the way for his release from Israeli incarceration.Several other senior Fatah members expressed support for Tirawi’s motion, and also demanded to know why the Palestinian Authority’s negotiating team had not demanded Barghouti’s release as a precondition for the latest round of talks with Israel, which commenced in late July.According to individuals who were present, Abbas responded, laughing, “You can ask, but why are you interrogating me?”

Tawfiq Tirawi (screen capture: ScreenNews/YouTube)

Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat, the sources said, responded to Tirawi’s motion. Erekat said he agreed that Barghouti’s appointment as vice president would indeed help the PA exert international pressure on Israel for his release.Abbas agreed in principle to the appointment of a deputy, if and when the Central Committee agrees upon and elects a candidate. As things stand, however, it is not thought that any candidate could gain the support of even half of the committee’s 23 members.Barghouti is highly popular among the Palestinian public, but does not enjoy broad support from the Fatah leadership, which fears his influence and popularity. Another leader whose name has featured in headlines recently, Jibril Rajoub, is considered relatively popular compared to other Fatah elites, but also does not command the support of the Central Committee members.Discussion of a vice president underlines the growing concern within Fatah about a successor to Abbas. The PA president has suffered from health problems in the past, and has threatened more than once to resign — though that option, for now at least, is not on the table.According to Palestinian law, if the president of the Palestinian Authority is unable to continue serving, he is temporarily replaced by the Speaker of the Palestinian Legislative Council– the PA’s parliament. At present, through, most inconveniently for Fatah, the PLC speaker is a Hamas politician, Aziz Dweik.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas during the 68th session of the General Assembly at United Nations headquarters on Thursday, Sept. 26, 2013. (photo credit: AP/Seth Wenig)

Some in Fatah argue that since Dweik’s appointment was not formally renewed a year after he took office, it is no longer valid. (Hamas, for its part, argues that since Abbas’s term as PA president formally expired in January 2009, his presidency is no longer valid.) Fatah is emphatically not interested in reconvening the PLC, where Hamas holds a majority, and has no desire to raise the issue of a succession to Abbas in a forum where it is outnumbered.Abbas holds three major titles at the moment: president of the Palestinian Authority, chairman of the PLO, and chairman of Fatah. It is possible that Fatah’s Central Committee, a sort of intermediary group between Fatah’s executive committee and the PLO’s Palestinian National Council (PNC), could select a figure who could step in as a temporary replacement for Abbas if for some reason an interim leader is required. This same body is also empowered to choose a new PLO chairman if and when necessary. As for the Fatah chairman’s role, should a new chairman be needed, the most likely scenario would see the appointment of Mohammad “Abu Maher” Ghneim, currently the general-secretary of the Central Committee as a temporary chairman until Fatah’s wider forum, the Seventh Committee, were to convene. 

NOTICE THE MORE PRESSURE OBAMA PUTS ON ISRAEL.THE WORSE THE AMERICAN SHUTDOWN GETS.WHEN WILL AMERICA AND THE WORLD EVER LEARN TO QUIT GOING AGAINST ISRAEL.AND START HAVING ISRAELS BEST INTERESTS AT HEART.THE MORE PRESSURE AGAINST ISRAEL.THE WORSE THE WORLD CONDITIONS WILL GET FOR HURTING ISRAEL-GODS WORDS NOT MINE.I JUST SAY WHAT GOD SAYS THREW HIS WORD-THE BIBLE.

Netanyahu ‘rejects Palestinian, American call’ for early prisoner release

Prime minister also fends off right-wing pressure to cancel the phased series of releases amid spate of West Bank violence

By Times of Israel staff October 9, 2013, 8:30 am 6-The Times of Israel

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected a Palestinian and American request to move up the expected release of Palestinian terrorists serving extended sentences in Israeli prisons, according to Haaretz.Israel agreed in July to a four-stage release of 104 prisoners serving sentences for acts of terror committed before the signing of the Oslo Accords in 1993. The agreement was intended as a sign of good faith ahead of the renewed American-brokered peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians.The first group of prisoners was released in August, just after talks between the two sides restarted.The second group of some 25 prisoners was slated to be released on October 29, but the Palestinian Authority asked Israel to release the prisoners in time for the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha next week.Netanyahu has faced pressure from hawkish ministers to delay or cancel the prisoner releases in the wake of a series of violent incidents in the West Bank in recent weeks, including the killing of two IDF soldiers and the attack that wounded a nine-year-old girl in the settlement of Psagot last Saturday.Netanyahu has resisted the pressure from the right and plans to release the prisoners on schedule, the prime minister’s representative in the peace talks, attorney Yitzhak Molcho, assured Palestinian and American officials in recent days.

Missing from Abbas meeting with MKs: Israeli flag, Palestinian journalists

PA president talks peace and condemns violence, dodges Netanyahu’s call to recognize Jewish Israel, does not reciprocate Knesset’s recent display of Palestinian flag

By David Horovitz October 8, 2013, 12:18 pm 11-The Times of Israel

RAMALLAH — At the start of Monday’s visit to Palestinian Authority headquarters by 11 Labor MKs and one from Hatnua, PA President Mahmoud Abbas shook hands warmly and posed for picture after picture with the Israeli delegation’s leader, Labor MK Hilik Bar. Behind them in the large meeting room was a huge photograph of Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, the golden Dome of the Rock sparkling. A dozen Israeli camera crews and still photographers, congregated at the far end of the meeting room beneath a large Palestinian flag, recorded the scene for posterity. Along the side wall, out of shot, was another big Palestinian flag, with the late Yasser Arafat’s beaming features at one end of it, and Abbas’s smiling face at the other.At the conclusion of the second, private part of the visit, from which journalists were supposed to have been excluded — after the MKs had introduced themselves to Abbas, two or three had asked pointed questions, and Abbas had ducked these while exuding bonhomie — the president posed for more pictures, many more. He posed with the entire visiting political delegation, with individual MKs, and with the representatives of two pro-peace Israeli groups who had joined the MKs. Labor’s ex-social activist Itzik Shmuli returned from the bathroom; Abbas got the rest of the group together and posed with Shmuli too. Stav Shaffir, the second social activist-turned-Labor MK, back a bit later from the loo, made it into yet a few more shots before the PA chief took his leave.Conspicuously absent from all these photographs, indeed absent from the entire room during the entire visit, was the Israeli flag. Not so much as a little one on the table. It made for quite a contrast to the scene on July 31, when members of Bar’s Knesset Caucus to Resolve the Arab-Israeli Conflict, hosting PA politicians in the Israeli parliament at a meeting attended by 33 MKs from parties representing 77 of the 120 MKs, held their talks with the Palestinian flag alongside Israel’s behind them — a much-headlined Knesset precedent.Also largely absent from Monday’s meeting were Palestinian journalists. Labor invited a busload of Israeli reporters to document the initial, public section of the meeting, and several of Abbas’s advisers were present too. But while an aide to Abbas said that Palestinian journalists were present, and a solitary one was espied, they proved hard to find.During the encounter, Abbas took pains to assert that, although there were “opponents of peace” on the Palestinian side too, he was sure that most of his people support a two-state solution. Evidently, however, he didn’t want to take the risk of inviting a sizable contingent of his own media to document, for his two-state-supporting people, this meeting with the dovish representatives of that other state. And if his people saw the photographs, he didn’t want that other state’s national flag causing him any trouble.Still, coverage in Tuesday’s PA newspapers was prominent — front page stories in Al-Ayyam and Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah, both featuring pictures of Abbas with Bar, both based on a press release issued by the PA news agency WAFA. And the public and private halves of the visit were conducted in a notably warm and friendly atmosphere.With the journalists in the room, Abbas said Israel and the Palestinians had been “very close” to an agreement when Ehud Olmert was prime minister, and lamented the lost opportunity, “for us and for you,” when that effort collapsed – because of Olmert’s resignation, he said. (Olmert has argued that Abbas missed the opportunity by failing to respond to the dramatic peace offer he made in 2008, shortly before he stepped down.) But the current talks were “very serious” too, Abbas said, and the nine-month time frame was “sufficient” to reach a permanent accord. (This assertion made the Al-Ayyam headline.) He hailed Israeli-Palestinian security cooperation, spoke of the need to quash incitement from both sides, and condemned “all attacks” that spill blood, with a specific reference to Saturday night’s incident in Psagot, the killing of an Israeli soldier in Hebron, and the deaths of four Palestinians at Qalandiya. “We don’t want blood,” he said. “We want peace.”He also protested the IDF’s “unnecessary” incursions into PA-controlled territory, castigated Israeli religious extremists “who come to disturb the peace” at Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, and reserved particular bitterness for settler attacks on Palestinians, their property, their trees, their churches and their mosques. (Al-Hayat Al-Jadidah headlined with his plea that the government put a stop to such attacks.)Like Abbas, Bar spoke of the imperative for a two-state solution, said he was pleased to hear the negotiations were moving “in a good direction,” and praised Abbas for leading “nonviolent resistance. He said the delegation had come to Ramallah to underline their backing for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Justice Minister Tzipi Livni in the effort to reach a peace accord. “It’s not always obvious,” said Bar, “but in the Knesset there is a very clear majority, 70 MKs, to support a two-state solution.”After the journalists had been asked to leave, the meeting continued in much the same tone, with added cigarettes. There was a moment of good humor when David Tzur (Hatnua), the only MK present from the coalition, couldn’t get his microphone to work. “It’s because you’re in the coalition,” joked Abbas adviser Yasser Abed Rabbo.There was a short speech from each MK — most of them first-time Knesset members, several visiting the PA’s Muqata HQ for the first time. (Shas was to have sent an MK, but the visit coincided with the death of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef.) And there were a few pointed questions.Apropos Netanyahu’s Sunday night speech at Bar-Ilan University, in which the prime minister said the failure to attain a peace accord stemmed from the Palestinian refusal to recognize “the nation-state of the Jewish people,” Labor’s Micky Rosenthal asked Abbas, “Do you have any objection to saying ‘Jewish Israel’?” His party colleague, Moshe Mizrahi, followed up, rather more passionately. “What difference does it make to you?… Why not say you recognize Israel as a Jewish state?”Abbas would not be drawn.He spoke a little about Fatah-Hamas reconciliation, saying that the Islamists would have to accept “all our positions” on the negotiations, including a two-state solution and nonviolent resistance. If they did that, “we’ll immediately hold elections.”He referred to a demonstration against the talks with Israel, right here in Ramallah on Sunday, but said, “We took our decision and we will not stop the negotiations.”He said there was “nothing preventing” him from meeting with Netanyahu, even in the near future, but that this summit would come when the Americans deemed it appropriate.But he ignored the “Jewish Israel” questions, referring the MKs instead to a book the PA put out a couple of years ago setting forth its positions, and repeating, “Let’s leave the specific issues to the negotiations.” A leaflet distributed to the MKs, “The Palestinian Position on Some Political Issues,” did include a section on the Israeli demand for Palestinian recognition of a Jewish state. It read as follows: “1. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) recognized the state of Israel in 1993 (mutual letters of recognition). 2. Prime Minister Netanyahu introduced this demand only two years ago, in order to obstruct the peace process. 3. Israel did not demand from Jordan and Egypt to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, when it signed peace treaties with them. 4. When the advisors of US President Harry Truman asked him in 1948 to recognize Israel as a Jewish state he crossed out ‘Jewish state’ and wrote instead ‘the state of Israel.’ 5. If the Israelis wish to change the name of Israel, they should do so at the United Nations.”Then came those farewell photographs, and the MKs emerged to relay to the reporters most of what had been said. They professed themselves encouraged, judged that Abbas had sounded quite optimistic, and found it unsurprising that he hadn’t responded to Netanyahu’s “Jewish Israel” comments. A few of Abbas’s advisers emerged too, and one of them, Mohammed Madani, did dispute the prime minister’s contention that blame for the lack of an accord lay with the Palestinians. “We’re not the problem. We can get Hamas on board,” he said. “It’s Israel that has to decide if it wants it.”None of the MKs mentioned the lack of an Israeli flag, which was a little surprising. At a meeting dedicated to reconciliation, and after all the headlines surrounding the high symbolism of the Palestinian flag at the Knesset two months ago, you’d have thought someone might have noticed.

The nature of peacemaking according to Netanyahu

The PM’s persistent demand that Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state is no mere rejectionist tic — it has deep roots in his grasp of the conflict

By Haviv Rettig Gur October 7, 2013, 5:54 am 41-The Times of Israel

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu delivered an aggressive, seemingly petulant speech Sunday night at Bar-Ilan University. Between Holocaust references and criticism of Palestinian leaders past and present, he demanded that the Palestinian Authority recognize not only the unassailable fact of Israel’s existence, but the historic right of the Jews to have their own sovereign state in this land.As one critic suggested derisively, he demanded that the Palestinians become Zionists before peace can be achieved.Only then will the current round of peace talks be “significant” and have “a real chance at success,” Netanyahu explained.It is tempting to side with the prevailing view of the global punditocracy that suggests Netanyahu is digging his heels in against the advance of the peace talks, creating artificial stumbling blocks to avoid the painful compromises that he will likely have to deliver for peace.But that view is wrong. Whether Netanyahu, deep in his heart, wants a peace deal with the Palestinians is a question beyond the ken of any commentator – and is perhaps unknown to Netanyahu himself.But his demand for Palestinian recognition of the Jewishness of Israel is no cheap tactic. It is the key to understanding his theory of the conflict, his view as to why the Oslo process 20 years ago failed, and his distrust of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in the new round of talks.When Israeli hawks complain about PA incitement, doves are fond of replying, “You make peace with enemies.”But Netanyahu has a different view, not about PA incitement, but about the nature of peacemaking.

When a Western leader once sought to make peace with his enemy, he found himself undermined politically and transformed into a laughingstock of history. That leader was Neville Chamberlain – and the enemy was Adolf Hitler. When another leader sought to unite a fractured society riven by racial discord, his efforts transformed him into a revered figure and his peacemaking efforts continue to heal and unify long after his death. That leader was Martin Luther King, and his enemy was the white racism that had tormented American blacks through centuries of slavery and inequality.The difference between Chamberlain’s failure and King’s success lay, in part, in their constituents’ view of the enemy. Soon after Munich, Britons came to view Hitler as implacably evil, and Chamberlain’s peacemaking efforts as accommodation with that unspeakable evil. (That this view of Hitler was correct is beside the point; the issue here is psychological. )

On the other hand, King did not call on American blacks to make peace with Ku Klux Klan murderers or the racist governors of southern states. He called on them to make peace with the just aspects of white America, its promise of freedom, no matter how long denied, its belief in its moral mission, no matter how hypocritical American moralizing may have seemed to suffering blacks. There is good in our enemy, King told his followers, and a peace can be struck with that good.The point here goes to the psychology of leadership: If the enemy is viewed as implacably evil, peacemaking necessarily becomes politically ruinous. It is only when the enemy is seen as possessing some justice on their side that a leader’s efforts to accommodate that enemy become legitimate and politically palatable.This difference in the perception of the enemy has arguably played an oversized role in recent Israeli history. During the 1990s, those Israelis who believed the Oslo peace process was addressing the Palestinians’ just demand for self-determination often saw the late prime minister Yitzhak Rabin as a national hero, “a warrior for peace.” Those who saw the Palestinians as an implacable, illegitimate enemy viewed Rabin as either a dangerous fool or a traitor.

Netanyahu’s demand for recognition has its roots in this Israeli experience. The Palestinians cannot bring themselves to end the conflict, Netanyahu believes, because they cannot bring themselves to compromise with an enemy they view as completely evil.They have not yet shifted from perceiving their enemy as absolutely evil to perceiving him as possessing some justice on his side, however limited. Israel remains a categorical foe, and see Israelis as interlopers robbing another people of their national home. Even Palestinian moderates share this basic view of Israel: it is an evil, but an evil too well entrenched to remove. Israel does not have even a modicum of justice on its side, only brute force, they believe.Thus, any Palestinian leader who seeks peace with Israel falls into the “Chamberlain trap,” finding himself undermined by the perception among his own people that he is accommodating evil rather than pursuing justice.

This analysis has become a key plank of Netanyahu’s policy toward the Palestinians, and has led to some of his most misunderstood speeches and demands. It is the reason he never fails to discuss the millennia-old Jewish attachment to the land of Israel in his speeches before a United Nations General Assembly that could care less.The Palestinians don’t need to become Zionists, Netanyahu believes, but they need to perceive that Jewish demands, too, are rooted in justice. Only then will their domestic constituencies and political systems be capable of engaging in peacemaking.It is a mistake to view Netanyahu’s Bar-Ilan 2 speech as indicating he is withdrawing, even in tone, from the peace talks. In fact, the renewed urgency of his demand for recognition — which he believes to be critical to peacemaking — might suggest that the talks are, at long last, getting serious.

ISRAEL SATAN COMES AGAINST

1 CHRONICLES 21:1
1 And Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel.

ISRAELS TROUBLE

JEREMIAH 30:7
7 Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even the time of Jacob’s trouble;(ISRAEL) but he shall be saved out of it.

DANIEL 12:1,4
1 And at that time shall Michael(ISRAELS WAR ANGEL) stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people:(ISRAEL) and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation(May 14,48) even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.
4 But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro,(WORLD TRAVEL,IMMIGRATION) and knowledge shall be increased.(COMPUTERS,CHIP IMPLANTS ETC)

Hagel promises Israel to be 'clear-eyed' on Iran

2 hours ago-OCT 9,13-Yahoonews

Washington (AFP) - US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has promised Israel the United States will be "clear-eyed" and committed to ensuring that Iran does not develop nuclear weapons as Washington pursues engagement.Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon, whose government has pressed for a hard line, visited Washington a week before Iran meets six nations to ease international concerns on its nuclear program that have triggered a US-led campaign of sanctions."Secretary Hagel noted that while the United States intends to test the prospect for a diplomatic solution with Iran we remain clear-eyed about the challenges ahead," Pentagon spokesman George Little said.The United States "will not waver from our firm policy to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons," he said.Iran's newly elected President Hassan Rouhani, a self-styled moderate, sought to ease longstanding tensions with the West during a week-long visit to the United States, culminating in an unprecedented telephone call with US President Barack Obama on September 27.
Iran's US-educated foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, has said he hopes to reach a settlement over Tehran's nuclear program within a year and will present a package during October 15-16 talks in Geneva with the United States and five other powers -- Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.Iran says that its uranium enrichment work is for peaceful purposes. But Western powers and Israel, which is believed to have a clandestine nuclear program, charge that the Islamic republic is seeking an atomic bomb.Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has urged no let-up in pressure on Iran and not ruled out a military strike.
Hagel, a former Republican senator and Vietnam veteran turned opponent of the Iraq war, has tried to reassure Israel after facing stiff opposition to his nomination following his remark that a "Jewish lobby" was intimidating lawmakers in Washington.

GENESIS 12:3
3  And I will bless them that bless thee,(ISRAEL) and curse (DESTROY) him that curseth thee:(DESTROY THEM AGAINST ISRAEL) and in thee (ISRAEL) shall all families of the earth be blessed.

THOUGH ISRAEL ONLY MAKES UP 000.005 OF A PERCENTAGE OF EARTHS POPULATION. 25% OF THE NOBEL PRIZES AND WORLD AWARDS GO TO ISRAEL.THIS SHOULD TELL YOU HOW GOD BLESSES HIS ISRAELIS AS WELL AS ISRAELIS BEING THE LEADER OF THE WORLD AND BLESSING THE WORLDS PEOPLE.SO WHY IS ISRAEL HATED SO MUCH AROUND THE WORLD IS MY VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION.

3 Jewish professors — two of them Israeli — share 2013 Nobel Prize in chemistry

Kibbutz-born Arieh Warshel fought in ’67 and ’73 wars; Pretoria-born Michael Levitt taught at the Weizmann Institute for most of the 1980s, took Israeli citizenship; Martin Karplus fled as a child to the US from Nazi-occupied Austria. Prestigious prize awarded ‘for the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems’

By Gavriel Fiske October 9, 2013, 12:53 pm Updated: October 9, 2013, 2:29 pm 6-The Times of Israel

Israeli professor Arieh Warshel on Wednesday won the Nobel Prize for Chemistry, along with fellow Jewish professors Michael Levitt (who also holds Israeli citizenship) and Martin Karplus.Warshel, 72, is a distinguished professor of chemistry and biochemistry at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, where he has been since the 1970s.Fellow winner Michael Levitt, a South Africa-born professor, taught at the Weizmann Institute in Rehovot for most of the 1980s. Vienna-born Martin Karplus fled the Nazi occupation of Austria as a child in 1938.Of the 23 chemistry Nobels awarded in the past decade, 11 of the winners were Jewish and six of them were Israelis.The trio won the award “for the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems,” the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced.Warshel, contacted by the Swedish Academy of Sciences live by phone at 3 a.m. Los Angeles time, shortly after the award was announced, said he had been watching the ceremony live on the Internet, and added cheerily that he felt “extremely well.”He said his research is motivated largely by his own curiosity. The work for which he and his colleagues were awarded the Nobel is for developing “a method that allowed us to understand how proteins actually work,” he said, and he explained that it was like seeing a watch, wondering what was going on inside, and finding out.“We developed how a computer can take the structure of a protein, and can understand how it does exactly what it does — for example digesting food,” Warshel said. “You want to understand how it is happening, and then you can use it to design drugs, or in my case, to satisfy your curiosity,” the professor added.

Arieh Warshel (photo credit: CC BY Wikipedia)

Later Wednesday, Warshel said “I feel Israeli,” even though he has spent almost the past 40 years in the US and also has US citizenship. He told Army Radio he visits Israel often, and that his children speak Hebrew.

Benny Warshel, his brother, told Israel Radio that Arieh brought great honor to the State of Israel. “He fought in this country’s wars, in the Six Day War and the Yom Kippur War, and he defends Israel in academic circles,” said Benny. “He’s very connected to this country,” he added.Warshel was born in 1940 in Kibbutz Sde Nahum, in the Beit She’an Valley. He served in the IDF (reaching the rank of captain), then attended Haifa’s Technion, where he got a BSc degree in Chemistry in 1966. He earned MSc and PhD degrees in Chemical Physics (in 1967 and 1969), at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot. He then did postdoctoral work at Harvard University, returned to the Weizmann Institute in the early 1970s and also worked for the Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, England. He joined the faculty of the Department of Chemistry at USC in 1976.

Michael Levitt (photo credit: CC BY Wikipedia)

Levitt, who was born in Pretoria in 1947, received his BSc from King’s College, London and his PhD in computational biology from the University of Cambridge. He was a Royal Society Exchange Fellow at the Weizmann Institute from 1967-1968, and later returned as a professor of chemical physics from 1980-1987.

The third winner, Martin Karplus, was born in Vienna in 1930, and, along with his family, fled to the United States in 1938 to escape the Nazi occupation of Austria. He attended Harvard University and received his PhD from the California Institute of Technology.His brother Robert Karpus, who died in 1990, was also a theoretical physicist and was a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

Martin Karplus (photo credit: courtesy Harvard University)

The Karpus family was “an intellectual and successful secular Jewish family” who were “prominent citizens” of Vienna, where there is a street named after them, according to “A Love of Discovery,” a biography of Robert Karpus published in 2002.In its reasoning, the academy noted that in the past, chemists “used to create models of molecules using plastic balls and sticks. Today, the modelling is carried out in computers. In the 1970s, Martin Karplus, Michael Levitt and Arieh Warshel laid the foundation for the powerful programs that are used to understand and predict chemical processes.”The academy continued, in a statement: “Computer models mirroring real life have become crucial for most advances made in chemistry today. Chemical reactions occur at lightning speed. In a fraction of a millisecond, electrons jump from one atomic nucleus to the other. Classical chemistry has a hard time keeping up; it is virtually impossible to experimentally map every little step in a chemical process. Aided by the methods now awarded with the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, scientists let computers unveil chemical processes, such as a catalyst’s purification of exhaust fumes or the photosynthesis in green leaves.”It said the work of Karplus, Levitt and Warshel “is groundbreaking in that they managed to make Newton’s classical physics work side-by-side with the fundamentally different quantum physics. Previously, chemists had to choose to use either or. The strength of classical physics was that calculations were simple and could be used to model really large molecules. Its weakness, it offered no way to simulate chemical reactions. For that purpose, chemists instead had to use quantum physics. But such calculations required enormous computing power and could therefore only be carried out for small molecules.”This year’s Nobel Laureates in chemistry, the academy said, “took the best from both worlds and devised methods that use both classical and quantum physics. For instance, in simulations of how a drug couples to its target protein in the body, the computer performs quantum theoretical calculations on those atoms in the target protein that interact with the drug. The rest of the large protein is simulated using less demanding classical physics. Today the computer is just as important a tool for chemists as the test tube. Simulations are so realistic that they predict the outcome of traditional experiments.”Vienna-born Karplus is based at the Université de Strasbourg, France, and Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Levitt, who holds UK and Israeli citizenship, works from Stanford University, California. Warshel, who holds US and Israeli citizenship, is a distinguished professor, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.The prize amount, SEK 8 million — some $1.25 million — is to be shared equally between the laureates.